Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate & Bankruptcy

Fraudulent Transfer

A letter from a bankruptcy trustee says a payment you received well before the filing from a company or a relative must be returned. The demand can feel arbitrary, but it follows a recognizable framework with its own defenses.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Fraudulent Transfer: what usually happens

Why a trustee looks backward

In bankruptcy, a trustee can pursue a fraudulent transfer to recover value for creditors. The claim may be based on actual intent to hinder creditors or on a transfer for less than reasonably equivalent value while the debtor was insolvent or became insolvent as a result. The look-back reaches further than many people expect, and a trustee can also borrow state law that may reach further still. Transfers to insiders, family members, and affiliated companies draw particular attention. A separate type of claim, for preferential payments to creditors, follows different rules and is often raised in the same letter.

Documents that support a defense

Recipients who gave value in good faith may have a defense, so evidence of what you provided in exchange matters. Gather invoices, contracts, delivery records, payroll records, or loan documents showing the exchange. Records showing what you knew about the debtor's finances at the time may also be relevant. Keep the trustee's letter and any complaint, since response deadlines can be short. Avoid contacting the debtor to coordinate a story, as that can create problems of its own. Where the transfer was a gift, such as money from a parent or an owner's payment to a family member, the value question is usually harder, and an early, candid review helps.

How these matters usually resolve

Many fraudulent transfer claims settle after the parties exchange information, especially where the trustee's evidence of insolvency or value is uncertain. Others proceed as lawsuits within the bankruptcy case, called adversary proceedings, with discovery and motions. We review the trustee's theory, the timing, and the value exchanged, then estimate the cost of defending compared with settling. Ignoring a complaint once one is filed can lead to a default judgment for the full amount demanded. If you are a creditor or trustee pursuing the claim, the same analysis applies in reverse. The first conversation focuses on what you received, what you gave, and what the trustee can likely prove.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about fraudulent transfer and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.