What general litigation tends to cover
The phrase describes disputes that do not sit neatly under one practice label. In practice that means disagreements with a vendor or a customer, money held by someone who will not release it, partners or co-owners who cannot agree on how to unwind something, claims between neighbors, a professional whose work caused a loss, and fights that began as a handshake arrangement. The label matters far less than the shape of the dispute: who the parties are, what was promised, what went wrong, and what you want to happen now. Many matters change category once the documents are read.
The questions that come first
Who is actually on the other side is the first one, because an individual, a company that has stopped operating, and an insured business are three very different situations. Then the paperwork: whether anything was signed, and if so whether it says where disputes have to go, since an arbitration clause or a venue provision can decide that before anyone files. Whether the other side can pay is a practical question people skip, and it deserves an early answer. A strong claim against someone with nothing to collect from is a different decision than a modest claim against a company with coverage. Deadlines also apply and they differ by state and by the type of claim.
What the first conversation decides
Usually it decides the next move rather than the whole strategy: whether a written demand is worth sending, whether a conversation between counsel is likely to go anywhere, or whether filing is the only thing that will get attention. We will also give you a candid sense of what the process would ask of you in time, documents, and cost, because that is often the deciding factor. If the matter belongs with someone who handles that area every day, we will say so rather than take it. Nothing has to be decided in the first meeting.