Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Cross-Border

Global Litigation

A product problem, a failed deal, or a regulatory issue in one country has started producing claims in several others. Each court moves on its own schedule, and what you say in one can surface in the next.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Global Litigation: what usually happens

When one dispute becomes many

Global litigation tends to arise when the same facts matter to customers, partners, or regulators in more than one country. A company may be a defendant in a U.S. court, a claimant in a European one, and a respondent in an arbitration, all over related events. Each forum follows its own procedure, and outcomes in one can influence another, sometimes through formal rules on prior judgments and sometimes simply because the other side reads the record. Positions taken casually in a smaller matter can be quoted back in a larger one. That is why these matters usually need a single strategy even when local counsel run each case.

Documents, privilege, and data across borders

Discovery in American courts is broad compared with many other systems, and material produced here can sometimes find its way into proceedings elsewhere. Privilege rules also differ: some jurisdictions treat communications with in-house lawyers differently from those with outside counsel, and a document protected in one place may not be protected in another. Data protection laws, such as Europe's GDPR, can limit how personal data is collected and sent to the United States for a lawsuit, and some countries have blocking statutes that restrict cooperation with foreign discovery. A litigation hold has to reach people and systems in every relevant country, and carrying it out should account for local employment and privacy rules.

Setting the strategy early

In an initial review we map where claims are pending or threatened, which deadlines are running, and which forum is likely to set the tone for the others. We look at whether insurance covers some or all of the matters and whether notice to insurers has been given. We discuss how communications will be coordinated so that local teams do not take inconsistent positions. We also consider whether some disputes can be consolidated, paused, or resolved together. Choosing the order in which matters are pushed forward or settled is often as important as the merits of any single case.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about global litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.