Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Administrative

Government Investigation Lawsuit

News of a government investigation rarely stays contained, and private lawsuits built on the same facts can follow quickly, sometimes before the investigation itself is resolved.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Government Investigation Lawsuit: what usually happens

The lawsuits that follow an investigation

Several kinds of private litigation tend to trail a government inquiry. Whistleblowers can file suits on the government's behalf under the False Claims Act, and those cases are filed under seal while the government decides whether to join. Public companies can face shareholder suits after disclosing an investigation, along with demands that the board look into its own conduct. Customers, competitors, and business partners may bring claims based on the same conduct the government is examining. Each case moves on its own schedule, and courts do not always pause one to wait for another. A whistleblower case can stay sealed for a long time, so a company may learn of it only after the government's inquiry is well advanced.

When one case can hurt another

Positions taken in one proceeding can be used in the others. Documents produced to the government may later be sought by private plaintiffs, and privilege can be lost if materials are shared too broadly. An individual who invokes the Fifth Amendment in a civil deposition is protected from self-incrimination, but in civil cases the other side can sometimes ask the factfinder to draw a negative inference from the silence. Admissions in a settlement with the government can become evidence in private litigation. For these reasons, the same facts usually call for a coordinated team with a single view of the whole picture.

Coordinating from the start

Early on, we map each proceeding that exists or is likely, including its deadlines, its parties, and the insurance that may respond. Directors and officers policies often cover defense costs in investigations and related suits, but notice requirements and exclusions vary. We consider whether a civil case should be stayed while the investigation continues and how discovery requests should be answered in the meantime. We also look at what disclosures a company has made or must make. For individuals, we check whether their interests differ from the company's and whether indemnification or advancement of legal fees is available.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about government investigation lawsuit and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.