Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Fraud & White Collar

Healthcare Fraud Investigation

Agents arrived at the practice with a warrant, a civil investigative demand landed on the administrator's desk, or Medicaid payments stopped without explanation. A healthcare fraud investigation can arrive in several forms, and each calls for a different first response.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Healthcare Fraud Investigation: what usually happens

The forms an investigation takes

Healthcare fraud investigations come from the HHS Office of Inspector General, the Justice Department, Medicare contractors, private insurers, and in New York, the Office of the Medicaid Inspector General and the Attorney General's Medicaid Fraud Control Unit. An audit letter or records request usually signals a billing review; a civil investigative demand points to a False Claims Act inquiry; a grand jury subpoena or search warrant points to a criminal one. Civil cases are often started by a whistleblower filing under seal, so an investigation can be underway long before the practice learns of it. Matters can also move from one track to another, which is why the first response should assume the stakes may grow.

If agents arrive at the practice

Ask for a copy of the warrant, call counsel, and let the agents carry out the search without interference. Staff can be told, accurately, that they may choose whether to speak with agents and may ask to have a lawyer present, but no one should discourage them from cooperating or suggest what to say. Keep track of what is taken, and ask how patient care records needed for ongoing treatment can be copied. Do not delete, alter, or add to any records afterward, including notes meant to complete a chart. Employees may need their own counsel, separate from the practice's.

Keeping the practice running

A payment suspension can threaten cash flow quickly, and there are processes for challenging or narrowing it that should be started early. If the review identifies overpayments, repayment obligations can arise on their own timeline, and holding a known overpayment can create separate liability. Licensing boards, exclusion from federal programs, and private payer contracts are related risks that need watching. A privileged internal review, done through counsel, helps the practice understand its exposure before responding in substance. A first consultation identifies which agency is driving the matter and plans the immediate response, including what staff should do when agents call.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about healthcare fraud investigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.