Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Medical

Healthcare Litigation

A payer stops paying claims, a hospital moves to revoke a physician's privileges, or a former employee files a sealed whistleblower suit. Healthcare litigation takes many forms, and many of them involve no patient injury at all.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Healthcare Litigation: what usually happens

The disputes providers face

Practices and facilities often end up in disputes with insurers over denied or underpaid claims, network terms, or the recoupment of past payments. Physicians may challenge decisions about hospital privileges or employment, and a hospital's medical staff bylaws often set out internal hearing steps that come first. Government investigations can develop into False Claims Act litigation, sometimes begun by a whistleblower whose complaint is filed under seal while the government decides whether to join. Professional licensing matters usually start in an administrative hearing rather than in an ordinary court. Each of these forums has its own procedures and deadlines, some of them short.

Records and privilege

Healthcare cases depend heavily on documents: claims data, contracts, credentialing files, peer review records, and email. Some of these, especially peer review and quality assurance materials, may be protected from disclosure under New York law, but the protection is narrower than many assume and can be weakened by careless sharing. Once litigation is reasonably anticipated, relevant records should be preserved, including electronic data that would otherwise be deleted on a routine schedule. Patient information in the file still has to be handled under privacy rules during litigation. Setting up preservation and handling procedures early avoids disputes about them later.

Charting the course

In an initial meeting we identify the forum, the deadlines, and any internal or administrative steps that must be completed before a court will hear the matter. We look at the contracts and policies that govern the relationship, because they often decide where and how a dispute is resolved, including whether it goes to arbitration. When a government inquiry is running alongside, we consider how the litigation and the inquiry affect each other. We discuss the realistic paths, including negotiation, and what each would require of the organization and its people. Then we set priorities for the first stretch of the matter.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about healthcare litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.