Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Fraud & White Collar

Identity Theft Defense

Someone else's name, card number, or account appears in the charges, and the government says you used it. Perhaps you share a home or a device with others, or the person whose information was used had once agreed to let you use it.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Identity Theft Defense: what usually happens

Who used the information

Many identity theft defense strategies begin with attribution. Accounts can be opened from a shared computer, a phone used by several family members, or a Wi-Fi network that others connect to, and an IP address or a delivery address does not always identify the person who acted. Packages addressed to a home may have been ordered by someone else who lives or stays there. Surveillance footage, device data, and handwriting can cut either way and need careful review. Sometimes the defendant's own identity was used too, and the trail leads to a third party who exploited both.

Consent, intent, and how the charges are stacked

Permission from the person whose information was used can change the picture, though it does not always defeat a charge, and people sometimes later deny consent they gave. Messages, shared accounts, and the history between the two people can matter a great deal. Identity theft charges also require proof of the purpose behind the use, which is often contested. In New York, identity theft is charged in degrees, often alongside possession of stolen property, forgery, or larceny. Federal prosecutors may add an aggravated identity theft count on top of fraud charges, and the Supreme Court has in recent years narrowed when that charge applies. How the counts are combined affects both the risk at trial and any negotiated resolution.

Building the record and next steps

Bring anything that shows who had access to the devices and accounts involved, any communications with the person whose information was used, and your own financial records for the relevant period. Do not reach out to that person to discuss the case, especially if an order of protection is in place. If you are not a U.S. citizen, these charges can carry immigration consequences that need separate attention before any plea. At the first meeting we go through the complaint or indictment and the evidence described in it, identify which facts are disputed, and consider whether early motions or a request for specific records should come first.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about identity theft defense and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.