Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocationsGo to integrated search
Go to integrated search
Cross-Border

International Joint Venture

A partner abroad offers market access, licenses, or local relationships, and you bring capital or technology. Before the documents are drafted, an international joint venture depends on knowing who that partner really is.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

International Joint Venture: what usually happens

Checking the partner

Diligence on a joint venture partner should cover its ownership, including any government shareholders, its financial condition, litigation history, and reputation in its market. Sanctions screening and an anti-corruption review are especially important where the partner deals with government agencies or will be the venture's link to officials. Ask how the partner handled earlier ventures and why they ended. Some countries cap foreign ownership in certain sectors, which can decide whether you are able to hold a majority stake at all. Speaking with former partners or local advisers, where possible, can fill gaps that documents leave. What you learn here often changes what you ask for in the agreement.

Protecting what you contribute

When technology or a brand goes into an international joint venture, decide whether it will be licensed or assigned, and what happens to it if the venture ends. Register patents and trademarks in the venture's country before sharing details, where that is possible. Limit access to sensitive know-how to what the venture actually needs, and confirm whether export control rules restrict sharing it at all. Capital contributions should come with clear terms on future funding, because disputes often begin when one partner cannot or will not put in more money. Confidentiality terms should bind the venture's staff as well as the partner itself.

Running and ending the venture

After launch, the practical issues are information rights, dealings between the venture and either partner, and what happens when the board cannot agree. We help set up reporting, approval processes, and a schedule for reviewing whether the venture is meeting its goals. When a venture ends, the exit provisions, the treatment of shared intellectual property, and any non-compete obligations decide how cleanly the partners separate. In a first meeting we review the proposed partner, the deal terms on the table, and the countries involved, and we point out which protections should be negotiated before anything is signed.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about international joint venture and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.