Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Intellectual Property

IP Defense

A demand letter accuses your product of infringing someone's patent, or a competitor's lawyers claim your brand copies theirs, and the business needs a plan before the deadline in the letter.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

IP Defense: what usually happens

Sorting the claim

An IP defense starts with knowing exactly what is asserted, because each type of intellectual property follows its own rules. Patent claims turn on whether your product falls within specific claim language and whether the patent is valid. Trademark claims usually focus on likelihood of confusion and on who used the mark first. Copyright claims look at ownership and copying of protected expression, with fair use and licenses as common defenses. Trade secret claims ask whether the information was truly secret and how it was obtained. Some letters are carefully grounded; others are sent widely in hopes of quick licensing payments, and telling the two apart early saves money.

First moves after a letter or complaint

Resist both extremes: ignoring the letter and answering it the same day. Early statements about your product or what you knew can be used later. If a complaint has been served, the deadline to respond is short. Preserve product documents, design history, sourcing records, and communications about the accused product. Notify your insurers promptly; standard general liability policies typically exclude patent claims but may cover some trademark or copyright claims tied to advertising, and dedicated IP policies exist. Check supplier and customer contracts for indemnities, since the duty to defend may sit with someone else.

Options on the table

Strategy depends on the claim and your business goals. For patents, options include designing around the claims, challenging validity in court, and petitioning for review at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, though the USPTO has discretion over whether to institute a review. A declaratory judgment action may let you choose the forum when a threat is concrete enough. Many disputes end in a license or a coexistence agreement. We start by assessing the strength of the claim and the cost of each path, then build the approach around keeping your product on the market. Bring the letter or complaint and details about the accused product.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about IP defense and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.