Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Criminal Defense

Joint Defense Agreement

When several people or companies are investigated or sued over the same events, their lawyers often want to compare notes. Doing that without losing privilege usually depends on a joint defense agreement and on how carefully it is used.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Joint Defense Agreement: what usually happens

What the agreement protects and what it does not

Sharing privileged information with an outsider ordinarily waives the privilege. A joint defense agreement, sometimes called a common interest arrangement, is the framework lawyers rely on to argue that communications among parties with a shared legal interest remain protected against everyone else. New York's highest court has read that protection narrowly under state law, generally tying it to pending or reasonably anticipated litigation, while some federal courts have taken a broader view. The shared interest has to be legal, not merely commercial. The agreement does not make one party's lawyer the lawyer for the others, and it does not stop a member from testifying about facts they personally know.

When one member starts cooperating

The most common point of stress is a member who decides to cooperate with prosecutors or settle separately. A carefully drafted agreement requires notice of withdrawal, addresses what happens to materials already exchanged, and usually includes a waiver so that counsel for the remaining members can cross-examine a former member who becomes a witness without facing disqualification. Even with those terms, cooperation can expose what was discussed, so many lawyers limit what they share and how. Agreements can be oral, but a written one reduces later arguments about whether an agreement existed and what it covered. These terms are often negotiated in a hurry, which is when mistakes get made.

Deciding whether to join

Joining is not automatic. Interests that look aligned at the outset can diverge, and an agreement may make it harder to change strategy later. Before advising a client to sign, we look at who the other parties are, how their exposure differs, what the government or opposing side already knows, and whether anything shared could later be turned against the client. For individuals, a separate question is whether a company paying legal fees is also part of the arrangement. We review the draft line by line and explain what each provision gives and what it takes away.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

04 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about joint defense agreement and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.