Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Medical

Life Sciences Transactions

A pharmaceutical company wants to acquire your biotech, a strategic partner proposes a co-development deal, or investors are lining up a financing round, and their diligence list runs to hundreds of items.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Life Sciences Transactions: what usually happens

What diligence focuses on

Life sciences transactions are valued on assets that are hard to see: patents and know-how, clinical data, regulatory standing, and manufacturing relationships. Buyers and investors want to confirm that the company actually owns or controls its key intellectual property, which means reviewing assignments from founders, employees, and academic collaborators. Correspondence with the FDA, inspection history, and clinical trial records are checked for anything that could delay approval. Contracts with research and manufacturing vendors are reviewed for change-of-control terms and supply risk. Problems found late in diligence tend to cost more in negotiating leverage than problems disclosed early.

How deal terms share the risk

Because development outcomes are uncertain, a large share of the price is often paid through milestone payments or contingent value rights that depend on future regulatory or sales events. The wording of those milestones, and any duty the buyer has to pursue them, is a frequent source of later disputes. Representations about regulatory compliance, data integrity, and IP ownership are heavily negotiated, along with how long they survive and how losses are recovered. Larger deals may require antitrust filings, and investment by foreign buyers in certain biotechnology companies can draw review from CFIUS. Collaboration agreements also need governance terms, such as joint committees and decision rights for when the partners disagree.

Getting ready before a term sheet

Companies that organize their records before a deal usually move through it faster and with fewer surprises. A data room with IP assignments, key contracts, regulatory submissions, and board materials is a reasonable starting point. We review the proposed structure, the counterpart's diligence requests, and areas where your records may be incomplete. We also discuss the terms that matter most to your stakeholders, whether that is upfront cash, retained rights, or continued involvement in development. From there we plan the work so that legal review keeps pace with the business negotiation.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about life sciences transactions and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.