Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Intellectual Property

Patent Arbitration

Your license says disputes go to arbitration, and the other side now claims you owe royalties on a product you believe falls outside the patent. Patent arbitration is allowed under federal law, but it works differently from a court case in ways that affect strategy.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Patent Arbitration: what usually happens

When a patent dispute goes to arbitration

Arbitration depends on agreement. It usually arises from a clause in a license, a joint development deal, or a settlement, although parties can also agree to arbitrate after a dispute begins. Federal law expressly permits arbitration of patent validity and infringement questions, so those issues are not off limits. Many cross-border licensing disputes go to institutions such as the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center or the ICC, partly because one award can resolve claims that would otherwise be spread across several national courts. Whether a particular claim falls inside the clause is often the first point of argument.

How it differs from litigation

The parties usually choose arbitrators, which allows a panel with technical or licensing background. Proceedings are generally private, discovery tends to be narrower than in federal court, and the schedule can be set to suit the case. The trade-off is limited review: courts overturn arbitration awards on narrow grounds, so a mistaken ruling on claim scope may stand. An award also binds only the parties, so a finding that a patent is invalid does not cancel it as against others. Awards concerning patents carry a notice requirement to the USPTO, which should be built into the closing steps.

Preparing for the first stage

Bring the agreement containing the arbitration clause, the patents involved, the royalty reports or sales records in dispute, and the correspondence that led to the disagreement. We look at the institution and rules named, the seat of arbitration, and whether the clause covers validity or only contract performance. Panel selection deserves attention early, since it shapes everything afterward. Interim relief, such as an order to preserve the status quo, may be available from the tribunal or from a court depending on the rules. A first conversation sets out whether arbitration is mandatory, what it can decide, and what the opening filing should contain. If the other side has already filed in court despite the clause, a motion to compel arbitration is usually the first filing to consider.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about patent arbitration and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.