Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Administrative

Regulatory Compliance Litigation

Regulatory compliance litigation usually starts after an agency investigation has run its course, with a charging document, a proposed penalty, or a lawsuit the agency files in court.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Regulatory Compliance Litigation: what usually happens

In-house hearings and courtrooms

Some agencies bring cases before their own administrative law judges, while others file civil actions in federal or state court. The forum affects the rules of evidence, the availability of a jury, and how quickly the case moves. The Supreme Court has held that some penalty claims must be tried before a jury rather than decided in-house, and how far that reaches is still being worked out. After an administrative decision, review usually goes to a court that examines the record rather than hearing the case anew. In New York, review of many state agency determinations comes through an Article 78 proceeding, while federal agency decisions are reviewed in federal court.

The record you build early

Because courts reviewing agency decisions often look only at the administrative record, what goes into that record during the agency proceeding can decide what may be argued later. Objections raised for the first time on review are frequently treated as waived. Keep every submission, transcript, and exhibit from the investigation and hearing stages, along with correspondence about scheduling and discovery. Communications with the agency should run through counsel so the record stays consistent. If parallel matters exist, such as a private lawsuit, a second agency, or a criminal inquiry, positions taken in one can be used in another.

Deciding how far to take it

Settling with a regulator usually involves a consent order or agreement whose terms can affect the business long after the payment is made, including reporting duties and any admissions. We look at what each path costs, what precedent a settlement would set for future inspections, and whether the agency's position is legally vulnerable. Deadlines to seek review of a final decision are often short and strictly applied, so timing is part of the first conversation. We also consider whether the penalty or order can be stayed while review proceeds. The aim is a decision made with a clear view of both the legal arguments and the business consequences.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about regulatory compliance litigation and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.