Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Administrative

Regulatory Enforcement Action

The informal inquiry is over: an agency has served a notice of charges, filed a complaint, or sent a proposed consent order, and a deadline to answer is printed on the first page.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Regulatory Enforcement Action: what usually happens

Recognizing the stage you are in

A regulatory enforcement action usually follows an investigation, and the formal papers mark a change in posture. Depending on the agency, the case may proceed before an administrative law judge inside the agency or as a civil action in court, and some agencies can choose between those paths. The charging document sets out the alleged violations and the relief sought, which may include penalties, restitution, or orders limiting how you operate. An answer is often due within a short period, and failing to respond can lead to a default. Read the papers for every deadline, including any for requesting a hearing, because some are fixed by rule and cannot easily be extended.

Organizing the defense

Collect the investigative file you already have, including subpoenas, document productions, testimony transcripts, and correspondence, and confirm that the litigation hold started during the investigation is still in place. Identify which employees were involved and whether any of them need separate counsel, since their interests may not match the company's. Agencies sometimes share information with other regulators and with prosecutors, so the response should account for parallel exposure. Public companies should consider their disclosure obligations as the action becomes formal. Contact with complainants or former employees about the case should go through counsel.

Settlement or hearing

Many actions end with a negotiated order, and those orders often impose obligations that last longer and cost more than the penalty, such as monitoring, reporting, or changes to business practices. The wording of findings and admissions can matter for private litigation, for insurance coverage, and for licenses held elsewhere. Some agencies have changed their policies on whether settling parties may publicly deny the allegations, so those terms deserve fresh attention. In a first meeting we review the charging papers, the record from the investigation, and the deadlines, and we weigh contesting the charges against negotiating terms the business can actually operate under.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

04 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

05 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about regulatory enforcement action and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.