Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate

Shareholder Dispute

Most shareholder disputes we see are not between strangers. They are between people who started something together and now disagree about money, control, or the way out.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Shareholder Dispute: what usually happens

How these disputes usually start

The trigger is often ordinary: distributions stop while one owner keeps drawing a salary, a minority owner is taken off the bank accounts and out of the meetings, one side wants to sell and the other does not, or requests for financial records go unanswered. In companies with two equal owners, the problem is sometimes that nothing can be decided at all. By the time someone calls, the business itself is usually feeling it, as vendors notice, employees take sides, and decisions get deferred. Acting while the company is still functioning leaves you more options than waiting does.

What the documents say first

Before anything else we read the operating agreement, shareholders agreement, or bylaws, because these often already answer the questions being argued about: how someone exits, how a price is set, who can call a meeting, and what records an owner is entitled to see. Gather the formation documents, any buy-sell arrangement, the minutes and consents that exist, recent financial statements, and the communications where the disagreement plays out. Note also what the owners actually did over the years, since long practice sometimes differs from the written document. Which state's law governs the entity usually follows from where it was formed.

The paths available

Some of these matters end in a negotiated buyout, where the disagreement is about price and terms rather than principle. Others need a court because one side will not share information or will not come to the table. Mediation is common, and confidentiality often matters to both sides more than it first appears. We will talk through what each path asks of you in time, cost, and disruption to the business. Whether you want to leave, to stay, or to be bought out is the answer that drives everything else, so it is worth deciding early.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

03 CASE RESULTS

Matters we have handled

Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about shareholder dispute and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.