Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Corporate & Bankruptcy

Single Asset Real Estate Bankruptcy

The building is the business. Rents from one property pay the mortgage, and the lender has started foreclosure after a default or a maturity the owner could not refinance.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Single Asset Real Estate Bankruptcy: what usually happens

How the label changes the case

The Bankruptcy Code treats single asset real estate differently from other businesses. The label generally applies to a debtor whose business is essentially owning and operating one income-producing property or project. Whether a property fits is sometimes contested, for example where the owner runs a hotel or provides services well beyond leasing space. The practical consequence is a faster track for the secured lender: unless the debtor, within a short window, either files a plan with a realistic chance of confirmation or starts making monthly interest-level payments to the lender, the lender can ask the court to lift the automatic stay. Owners whose main business is single asset real estate also generally cannot use Subchapter V.

What the case has to show early

Because the clock is short, a single asset real estate bankruptcy needs a credible plan almost from the start. Expect the lender to argue about the property's value, the rents it will produce, and whether a plan can be confirmed over its objection, and many of these cases come down to an appraisal fight. The rents are usually the lender's cash collateral, so using them to pay operating costs requires either the lender's consent or court approval. Gather the rent roll, leases, operating statements, loan documents, any forbearance correspondence, and a current appraisal or broker opinion. Refinancing or sale commitments, even preliminary ones, tend to carry more weight than projections.

Whether filing actually helps

A filing can buy time to refinance, sell, or restructure the loan, but it rarely buys much time without a plan behind it. Courts look skeptically at filings made on the eve of a foreclosure sale with no visible path forward, and repeated filings can lead to orders that limit the stay in later cases. Guarantors, often the owners themselves, are generally not protected by the property entity's case. In a first meeting we look at the gap between the debt and the property's realistic value, the lender's posture, and whether a sale or refinancing can close inside the window the case would allow.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about single asset real estate bankruptcy and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.