Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Intellectual Property

Software Patent

An engineer has built something clever, and the question in the room is whether it can be patented or is 'just software.' The answer usually depends on how the invention is described as much as on what it does.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Software Patent: what usually happens

Eligibility is the first hurdle

Software is not barred from patent protection in the US, but claims that amount to an abstract idea carried out on a generic computer are routinely rejected or invalidated under the eligibility framework the Supreme Court has set. Claims tend to fare better when they describe a specific technical improvement, such as a change in how a computer, a network, or a data structure actually works, rather than a business result achieved with ordinary computing. Examiners and courts apply that framework unevenly, and USPTO guidance has shifted over time, including for inventions that involve machine learning. Clearing eligibility is not the end of it: the invention also has to be new and not obvious over earlier work.

Disclosure and inventorship

Timing can matter as much as content. The US gives inventors a limited grace period after their own public disclosure, but many other countries give little or none, so a product launch, a conference talk, or an open-source release before filing can close doors abroad. Named inventors have to be people, and where AI tools contributed to the work, the question of what counts as a human inventive contribution draws close attention. Bring descriptions of the architecture, any drafts or diagrams, the dates of any demos or releases, and a list of everyone who contributed to the core idea.

Choosing the right protection

Not every valuable piece of software should be patented. A patent requires publishing how the invention works, and an algorithm that runs on your own servers and cannot be observed from outside may be better kept as a trade secret, while the code itself is covered by copyright. Some companies file on what competitors can see or reverse engineer and keep the rest confidential. Enforcement is worth thinking about early too, since infringement of a server-side method can be hard to detect or prove. Early discussion of a software invention usually focuses on what is new in the system, what a competitor could detect, and where a filing would justify its cost.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about software patent and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.