Aboutwhy sjkplawyerspracticesInsightsCase StudyNewsLocations
Tax & Customs

Tax Arbitration

People often search for tax arbitration hoping for a quicker way out of a dispute with the IRS. The reality is narrower: arbitration appears in a few specific corners of tax practice, and most disputes with tax authorities follow other routes.

Reviewed

01 GUIDE

Tax Arbitration: what usually happens

Where arbitration actually shows up

In disputes with the IRS, the familiar path runs through examination, the Independent Office of Appeals, and the courts, and binding arbitration is not a standard part of that process. Appeals has offered mediation and other alternative dispute resolution options in limited situations, and whether one is available should be confirmed for the particular case. In cross-border matters, when two countries tax the same income, their competent authorities may try to resolve the conflict through a mutual agreement procedure. Some tax treaties provide for arbitration if the authorities cannot agree. Those proceedings are run by governments, and the taxpayer's role depends on the treaty and the procedure involved.

Private disputes about tax

Arbitration is far more common between private parties. Purchase agreements often contain tax indemnities, rules for allocating the purchase price, and provisions sending disagreements over closing adjustments to an independent accountant or arbitrator. Partnership and operating agreements may route disputes over tax distributions or allocations to arbitration as well. In those settings the arbitrator decides what the contract requires between the parties, and the decision does not bind the IRS or a state tax department. Keep the full agreement, the returns and workpapers at issue, and the correspondence showing how each side understood the provision.

Before you agree, or once a dispute begins

If you are negotiating a deal, we look at whether an arbitration or accountant-determination clause is clear about its scope and about what happens if a tax authority later takes a different view. If a dispute has already started, we review the clause, the deadlines it sets, and whether the issue falls within it at all. We also ask whether a parallel audit is underway, because positions taken in an arbitration can surface in a tax examination, and the reverse. That review tells us whether arbitration is the right forum or whether another route fits the problem better.

02 ATTORNEYS

Who you would be working with

Attorneys at our New York and Washington, D.C. offices handle matters like this one.

05 HOW WE WORK

Client-centered service across jurisdictions

Global Coordination & Expertise

We deliver coordinated and effective legal services to our clients, utilizing our extensive legal resources and experienced attorneys in our well-integrated global network. Through our Washington D.C. and New York offices, together with our alliance

Multilingual & Cross-Border Communication

Our attorneys are experienced in both domestic and international matters and, with fluency in various languages, provide clear and consistent communication at every stage of your legal process.

Client-Centered Approach

Client service lies at the heart of our operations. From the initial consultation, we prioritize understanding your situation, listening to your goals, and providing regular updates and strategies tailored to your individual case.

Multidisciplinary & Efficient Solutions

Our multidisciplinary approach and established processes enable us to address cross-border challenges with efficiency.

06 OFFICES

Where we meet clients

Consultations are available in person or remotely.

New York

285 Fulton Street, New York, NY 10007
(855) 529-7557

Washington, D.C.

Suite 985, 1717 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20006
(855) 529-7557

Los Angeles

1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 820, Los Angeles, CA 90067
(424) 561-7557

Attorney Advertising. This page is general information about tax arbitration and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Outcomes depend on the facts of each matter, and prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Laws differ by state and change over time.