Go to integrated search

Others

Showing 19 - 24 of 1265 results.

Motion to Vacate Default Judgment and Restore a Dismissed Claim

Motion to vacate default judgment may help a plaintiff reopen a claim dismissed after a missed court appearance. A plaintiff generally must show a reasonable excuse for the default and a potentially meritorious claim. Lack of notice may require a different analysis. The grounds, supporting evidence, and filing dates determine how to seek restoration and challenge a denial.

Read more

Section 1782 Discovery Has Specific Requirements and Limits

Section 1782 discovery allows eligible applicants to seek U.S. .vidence for use in qualifying foreign legal proceedings. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1782, federal courts may authorize document production or testimony to assist proceedings abroad. Whether a request succeeds depends on the tribunal involved, the discovery target's connection to the judicial district, and the evidence sought. Even a qualifying application may face restrictions based on privilege, burden, or judicial discretion.

Read more

IRS Audit Notice: Response Deadlines and Legal Strategies

Receiving an IRS audit notice requires a prompt response, typically within 30 days, to prevent the agency from assessing default tax deficiencies. The initial phase dictates the examination's scope and establishes the foundation for your defense. Taxpayers must gather specific financial records, evaluate potential liabilities, and address information requests before the opening conference.

Read more

How an Appeals and Post-Conviction Relief Lawyer Can Help

An appeals and post-conviction relief lawyer reviews criminal judgments, identifies possible legal errors, and explains available remedies and costs. A conviction does not always end a criminal case. Defendants may still challenge trial errors, unlawful sentences, or constitutional violations. The next step depends on what went wrong, when it happened, and whether the issue belongs in a direct appeal or a post-conviction motion.

Read more

FTC Corteva Settlement and Antitrust Risks in Loyalty Programs

The proposed FTC Corteva settlement targets distributor incentives that restrict purchases of competing generic pesticides. The proposed restrictions concern purchasing conditions, lost rebates, and responses to competing purchases. Manufacturers and distributors can use those issues to review their own programs, but Corteva’s settlement terms do not establish a universal test for lawful discounts.

Read more

Exclusive Dealing Antitrust Risks in Loyalty and Distribution Programs

Exclusive dealing antitrust risks can arise when loyalty discounts or distribution terms restrict rivals’ access to the market.These arrangements are often lawful. Concern increases when purchase-share thresholds, lost rebates, or supply restrictions effectively close important sales channels to competitors. Under federal antitrust law, the analysis considers market power, the extent and duration of exclusion, and benefits that promote competition.

Read more

Online Consultation
Phone Consultation