
Transnational litigation refers to legal disputes that cross national borders, involving parties from different countries. A crucial first step in these cases is determining which court has the authority, or jurisdiction, to hear the case. Misjudging jurisdiction can lead to significant setbacks, including the dismissal of the lawsuit or rendering a favorable judgment unenforceable.
Leer más

A gift within the annual exclusion has no effect on the donor's lifetime exclusion. For 2026 that amount is $19,000 per recipient, or $38,000 where spouses elect to split gifts. Only the excess counts against the lifetime figure, which is $15 million per person in 2026, and it is the excess that triggers a Form 709, due April 15 of the following year. New York matters here for two reasons, and neither is a state gift tax — New York repealed that in 2000. The first is the three-year add-back under Tax Law § 954(a)(3): taxable gifts made by a New York resident within three years of death are added back into the New York gross estate, so a deathbed transfer does not remove the asset from the state computation. The second is the cliff. New York's basic exclusion is $7.35 million for 2026, and an estate exceeding 105 percent of that figure is taxed on its entire value rather than on the excess. An estate just over the line can owe substantially more than one just under it, which is what makes the timing and size of lifetime gifts worth working out in advance rather than after. One point runs the other way. Property transferred by gift carries the donor's basis, while property passing at death generally receives a basis step-up to the date-of-death value. For appreciated assets, gifting can shift an income tax cost to the recipient that would not have arisen had the asset been held.
Leer más

A grand jury subpoena duces tecum does not allow a corporate custodian to invoke the Fifth Amendment. Braswell v. United States (1988) held that the act-of-production privilege is unavailable to someone producing in a representative capacity, so the records go out and the dispute narrows to the custodian’s own testimony. Preservation obligations attach when the subpoena arrives, and destroying documents afterward is a separate offense under 18 U.S.C. § 1519 carrying twenty years. That exposure is often greater than the conduct under investigation. Privilege over an internal review depends on how counsel’s engagement was framed before the review began. An Upjohn warning given to each employee interviewed records that the privilege belongs to the company and may be waived without the employee’s consent, and a company that reports its findings to the government waives it as to those accounts.
Leer más

New York fixes prejudgment interest at nine percent per year, simple, under CPLR 5004, running from the date the cause of action accrued on a contract claim. In a dispute that takes years, that figure can approach the principal and is not discretionary. Consequential damages are the narrower question. Under New York law they are recoverable only where they were foreseeable and within the contemplation of the parties at contracting, and most commercial agreements contain an express waiver — so the clause usually matters more than the proof of loss. On enforcement, a New York judgment still has to be collected where the assets are. Where the counterparty’s assets sit abroad, an arbitration clause under the New York Convention is ordinarily more reliable than a judgment, and that choice is made in the contract rather than after the breach.
Leer más

Real estate litigation attorney guidance on lis pendens and injunctions when disputed California property faces an imminent sale. A buyer may be ready to close while ownership remains contested. Filing a lawsuit does not halt escrow by itself. The plaintiff must determine whether the pleaded claim qualifies for a recorded notice or whether immediate court relief is needed. That decision turns on the property right at issue, the closing date, and the available evidence.
Leer más

A constitutional case is a legal proceeding in which a party challenges the constitutionality of a statute, regulation, government action, or court order on grounds that it violates protections or prohibitions set forth in the U.S. Constitution or a state constitution. Constitutional claims require that a petitioner establish both standing (a concrete injury or threatened injury traceable to the challenged action) and a viable legal theory rooted in constitutional text or precedent. If procedural requirements are not met, courts may dismiss the case without reaching the merits, leaving the constitutional question unresolved and the petitioner without a remedy. This article examines the foundational elements of constitutional cases, the burdens petitioners face, the procedural postures available in federal and state courts, and key considerations for documenting and preserving constitutional arguments.
Leer más
