Go to integrated search
contact us

Copyright SJKP LLP Law Firm all rights reserved

法律资讯

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Compliance Guide for Us Businesses

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act compliance requires US businesses to enforce strict anti-bribery policies and internal accounting controls. Federal agencies audit international operations and impose severe civil and criminal penalties for non-compliance. Corporate entities in New York and across the United States must implement thorough due diligence to manage regulatory risks.

阅读更多

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: Compliance Guide for US Businesses

Energy Law: Comprehensive Legal Guidance for the Energy Sector

Energy law governs power generation, transmission, and environmental compliance across state lines. In New York, energy market actors face overlapping regulatory requirements from FERC and the PSC. SJKP’s attorneys evaluate compliance rules and jurisdictional boundaries to defend energy entities against statutory violations and operational claims.

阅读更多

Energy Law: Comprehensive Legal Guidance for the Energy Sector

Aerospace and Defense Government Services: Key Risks, Deadlines, and Next Steps

3 Bottom-Line Points on Aerospace and Defense Government Services from Counsel: Compliance audits triggered by contract amendments, suspension, debarment exposureCounsel working in aerospace and defense government services must navigate a regulatory environment where contract performance, security clearance status, and compliance certifications directly determine business viability. This article addresses the core legal risks that in-house counsel and business decision-makers face when managing government contracts in this sector, with emphasis on early intervention points where legal strategy can prevent costly disputes or loss of contracting eligibility.Risk CategoryPractical ImpactTimelineContract Performance DisputesTermination for convenience or default; recovery exposureNotice within 10–15 days typicalSecurity Clearance IssuesLoss of facility clearance; inability to perform classified workInvestigation ongoing; revocation within 60–90 days possibleSuspension and DebarmentExclusion from federal contracting; affiliate liabilityProposed action; 30 days to respondCompliance CertificationsContract termination; False Claims Act exposureAnnual or contract-specific recertification

阅读更多

Aerospace and Defense Government Services: Key Risks, Deadlines, and Next Steps

Faa Regulations Aerospace: from Type Certification to Ad Compliance

Part 23 and Part 25 are not two versions of the same rulebook.Since the 2017 rewrite, Part 23 no longer prescribes how an aircraft must be built. It states the outcome and leaves the applicant to propose a means of compliance for FAA acceptance — which shifts the certification burden from meeting a specification to justifying an approach. Part 25 remains prescriptive. Which applies is fixed by the aircraft's weight, seating, and propulsion; it is not a choice. The choice is TC or STC. A new type certificate means establishing a certification basis from the ground up. A supplemental type certificate modifies a design already certificated, and it is faster — until the modification is substantial enough that the FAA treats it as a new type. Where that line falls is a judgment made early and expensive to revisit. Certification basis fixes your exposure. Which amendment level applies determines what you must show, and it is set at application rather than at approval. Programs that slip across rulemaking cycles find the ground has moved. After approval, the obligations continue. A production certificate carries quality system requirements that are audited, not assumed. Airworthiness directives are mandatory and carry compliance deadlines; an aircraft out of compliance is not airworthy, whatever its certificate says. And for manufacturers who export, EASA and other authorities validate rather than simply accept — a parallel process that runs on its own terms.

阅读更多

FAA Regulations Aerospace: From Type Certification to AD Compliance

Key Legal Considerations for Advertising and Marketing Promotions

3 Priority Considerations in Advertising and Marketing Promotions Matters: FTC substantiation requirements, state consumer protection compliance, and sweepstakes and contest regulation.Advertising and marketing promotions operate within a complex regulatory framework that extends across federal, state, and local jurisdictions. For in-house counsel, marketing managers, and business decision-makers, understanding where legal exposure concentrates is essential to avoiding costly enforcement actions and reputational damage. The landscape has shifted significantly in recent years, with regulators increasingly scrutinizing influencer partnerships, environmental claims, and social media disclosures. This article examines the core legal risks that counsel should evaluate before campaigns launch.

阅读更多

Key Legal Considerations for Advertising and Marketing Promotions

Advertising Laws: Are You Missing Key Risks?

3 Bottom-Line Points on Advertising from Counsel: Substantiation requirements, competitor claims, regulatory exposure.Advertising compliance is far more complex than most business owners realize. Whether your company is launching a new campaign, making product claims, or competing in a regulated industry, the legal framework governing advertising involves overlapping federal and state rules that create real exposure. The stakes range from corrective advertising orders to substantial civil penalties and, in some cases, criminal liability. Understanding the core compliance areas now prevents costly mistakes later.

阅读更多

Advertising Laws: Are You Missing Key Risks?
预约咨询
Online
Phone