GaHyun SIM Senior Associate Attorney | Daeryun Law LLC Expert・Lawyer Recommendation

GaHyun SIMRepublic of Korea

Senior Associate Attorney

Attorney Specializing in School Violence/Criminal Law

T. 070-7510-1755

GaHyun SIMRepublic of Korea

Senior Associate Attorney

Attorney Specializing in School Violence/Criminal Law

T. 070-7510-1755

"Through professional and thorough review of the case, I will assist so that clients can obtain the results they want"

He possesses abundant know-how in various lawsuits requiring professional review, such as drunk driving, traffic accidents, sex crimes, damages, and voice phishing. In particular, having been involved in numerous school violence and juvenile crime cases, he has accumulated abundant practical experience and expertise. Even in sex crimes and special injury cases involving middle and high school students, he draws out relatively light dispositions such as juvenile protection dispositions No. 1 and No. 2, doing his utmost to protect the human rights of minor clients.

Related Practice Areas

Experience

(Former) Public Defender, Gwangju District Court
(Former) Non-stop public defender for arrest cases at Gwangju District Court
(Former) Beopseung Law Firm
(Current) Daeryun Law Firm (Limited)

Key Activities

Member of the Human Rights and Legal Aid Committee of the Gwangju Local Bar Association
Gwangju Local Bar Association Migrant Legal Support Lawyers Member
Interviews and newspaper contributions related to school violence, stalking crimes, etc.

Key Achievements

In the case of a voice phishing collector found guilty in the first trial, the defendant was acquitted in the second trial by denying the defendant's intention and overturning the first trial.
In a case of forced molestation, the case was acquitted due to denial of intent even though contact with the victim's buttocks was acknowledged.
In a case of violation of the Stalking Punishment Act, a case in which acquittal was claimed by making a legal interpretation despite the fact that there were no lower court precedents or papers, etc.
Even though it was impossible to judge the possibility of avoidance in the case of a fatal accident by a teacher, the basis for the claim of innocence in the defense opinion was recorded in the judgment as is, and the case was acquitted.
In a loan fraud case, the case was acquitted even though it was acknowledged that the loan was returned.
In a case of violation of the Information and Communications Network Act (defamation), the facts stated in the indictment were acknowledged, but the case was acquitted through legal arguments.
In a case where he was indicted for violating the Stalking Punishment Act due to several acts of stalking, he was partially acquitted (partially acquitted, ultimately fined) by claiming that some of the acts did not constitute stalking.
A case in which a middle school student was charged with using a camera to secretly film a victim defecating in the women's restroom, and was acquitted (not guilty stated in the decision) after contesting the charges in a juvenile trial.
Case of forcible molestation of a minor under the age of 13 and violation of the Child Welfare Act, in which the charges were contested in a juvenile trial and the case was acquitted.
A case of attempted special theft in which a 6th grade elementary school student conspired with another student to steal a motorcycle using a knife. A case in which only the client student was exempted.