Press Coverage

④"No more 'sour rice cake sentences'" Seoul Administrative Court's simple language ruling 'eye-catching' "It will also help improve judicial credibility" "Even if it did not violate the law, I have a request and request from the plaintiff student.", "It would be difficult to tell a very young adolescent student to control his emotions like an adult, right? The judges in this case also had such times, and the same goes for other adults." This January, the Seoul Administrative Court The 11th Administrative Division (Chief Judge Kang Woo-chan) ruled in favor of the plaintiff in a lawsuit to cancel dispositions such as service hours, and unlike general cases, 'the contents of the judgment and instructions summarized in simple language for the juvenile plaintiff' were specified in a boxed form in the judgment. At the time, Chief Judge Kang said, "The person involved in the case is the plaintiff student himself. In order to become a mature adult who can take responsibility for his own life, he must fully know and understand what is happening to him and what the results were, and learn something from it," and did not spare words of advice and encouragement for the plaintiff who will read the verdict beyond the simple sentence. The 11th Administrative Division, led by Chief Judge Kang, was also the first to attempt the 'Easy Read Judgment' for the hearing impaired. According to Asia Today's coverage on the 7th, the search for a court that will take the lead in writing judgments easily, like the '11th Administrative Division', has begun at the court level. The National Court Administration posted a notice on the court's internal Courtnet last month and is recruiting judges to participate in the implementation of appropriate judgments by the 24th. This is good news that has come out since the start of this magazine's 'Let's Write Judgment Easily' project series. In the future, the National Court Administration will △ single cases in civil and domestic affairs and their appellate cases (including civil small claims cases) △ cases with relatively low appeal rates and reversal rates (loans, third party objections/claim objections, sale proceeds, transfer proceeds, distribution objections) △ cases with a large number of cases and relatively stereotyped cases. We are working on optimizing the writing of concise and easy-to-understand judgments only for cases (delivery and demolition of buildings, cancellation of fraudulent acts, compensation for automobile accident damages, and rental deposits). An example of the previously discussed 'adjustment of civil and domestic affairs judgments' is also attached to this notice. △Writing in a modified or enumerated form instead of a complete sentence △Omitting the basic facts and listing only the issue and judgment about it △Replacing basic and acknowledged facts that are not in major dispute with a separate page △Replacing the claims of the parties with a title △If there are many items claimed, organizing them in a table and simply writing them down. Based on this, it seems that even more creative methods will be discussed. An official from the National Court Administration said, "If you write in sentences for completeness, “There are a lot of conjunctions such as ‘but’, ‘however’, and ‘and’, and we plan to optimize them by listing them in the form of a report,” he explained. “Since there are only subjects and predicates, it will be easier to write and readable for readers.” In the legal community, it is pointed out that the optimization of judgments that the court is attempting to do should not only aim to reduce the burden of judges’ work, but should also take into account the aspect of improving judicial access for the general public. Even though there are objective and neutral terms that are familiar to the general public, there is a need to avoid using difficult Chinese terms and establish a comprehensive standard and system for this. Attorney Yujin Moon (representative attorney of a trial law firm), who was a judge, said, "When I was a judge, I said in court that 'the trial has been renewed' while conducting a trial, but explained 'It means that the trial has been reviewed again because the judge has changed.'" Also, in the ruling, he said, “I think it is easier for the general public to use the simpler expression ‘rights were taken away’ rather than ‘rights were taken away’,” he said. “In the end, the court needs to create standards that can change the difficult terms currently being used into familiar and easy-to-understand terms.” Therefore, it is emphasized that outdated legal terms should be revised legislatively and that judges should make an effort to keep sentences as short as possible in their rulings. Na-ri Park, a former judge and chief general counsel at Daeryun Law Firm, said, "It is also called a 'Silutteok sentence', and it would be good to avoid the structure of paragraphs that overlap several sentences (in severe cases, exceeding one page) in the manner of 'If you put point, point, point, point together, it is judged that ~'." Park continued. The lawyer said, "I think the attempt to write a short and easy-to-understand judgment is very positive," and added, "If the court makes an effort to write a judgment that takes the people's position into consideration, I think it will help improve the people's judicial trust in the court."  [View full article] - “Short and concise”… Signs of change within the judiciary

On April 25, the Constitutional Court ruled that the reserved portion system, including Article 1112 of the Civil Act, was partially unconstitutional and inconsistent with the Constitution in a review and constitutional appeal. “Brothers and sisters’ inheritance is unconstitutional.” The Constitutional Court ruled that the current civil law, which stipulates that brothers and sisters inherit a certain percentage of the inheritance regardless of the deceased’s will, is unconstitutional. As a result, the effect of Article 1112, Paragraph 4 of the Civil Act, which states that 'brothers and sisters of the deceased are entitled to a reserved share of one-third of the statutory inheritance', was immediately lost at the time of the decision to be unconstitutional. The Constitutional Court made this decision, pointing out that "it is difficult to find a valid reason for granting a reserved share, even though brothers and sisters are hardly recognized for their contribution to the formation of the inherited property or their expectations of the inherited property." Previously, the right to claim a reserved portion was an inheritance right that brothers and sisters could also claim, but this means that in the future, brothers and sisters will not be able to file a lawsuit claiming the return of a reserved portion based on the reserved portion. "The reserved portion for spouses and lineal ascendants and descendants is inconsistent with the Constitution." The Constitutional Court ruled that the part stipulating the statutory inheritance for spouses and lineal ascendants and descendants was also unconstitutional because it did not specify the reasons for loss of reserved portion. Recognizing the reserved portion of an heir who has engaged in immoral acts, such as abandoning his or her parents for a long period of time or mentally and physically abusing them, is said to be contrary to the legal sentiments and common sense of the general public. Therefore, Article 1112 Nos. 1 to 3 of the Civil Act, which does not separately provide for the reasons for loss of reserved portion, creates an unfair and unreasonable situation in which a contributing heir must return the donated property in response to a non-contributory heir's request for return of the reserved portion. Article 1118 of the Civil Act was unanimously judged to be inconsistent with the Constitution as it was a legislative act that did not provide for Article 1008-2 to apply mutatis mutandis to reserved portions. The purpose is that the reserve may be lost depending on specific circumstances, such as adultery or neglect of a child by a parent. Constitutional inconsistency is a decision that temporarily remains in effect until the National Assembly revises the law due to concerns about confusion caused by a legal vacuum. Regarding the above two provisions, they called for legislative improvement, saying that they will remain in effect only until revised by the legislator (National Assembly) with a deadline of December 31, 2025. Forced inheritance distribution system, first decision of the Constitutional Court in 47 years. An official of the Constitutional Court said, "This is the first decision to comprehensively rule on the legitimacy of the reserve system and the constitutionality of specific provisions." “We continued to recognize the legitimacy of the Constitution in that it is necessary, but it is significant in declaring some provisions unconstitutional and urging legislative improvement,” he explained. The current Civil Code sets the share (statutory inheritance) that children, spouses, parents, brothers, and sisters can inherit. The reserved portion system is the minimum inheritance amount set by law and was introduced in 1977 to prevent specific heirs from monopolizing inherited property. Simply put, even if the deceased inherited all of the property through a will only to a specific heir, the remaining surviving family members who did not receive the inheritance can file a lawsuit based on the reserve system and receive the inherited property. There have been continued criticisms that this reserve system excessively infringes on individual property rights and lags behind social changes. In addition, controversy over the reserve system arose further as singer Goo Hara's biological mother, who had not been in contact with her since her death in 2019, claimed her inheritance rights, and the so-called 'Goo Hara Act', which limits the right to request reserves, was proposed in the National Assembly, but was abolished at the end of the 20th National Assembly session. The Constitutional Court made a decision that had been pending for 47 years regarding the reserved portion system, which has repeatedly raised questions about its unconstitutionality. Park Yong-du, an inheritance lawyer, said, "We must intensively study inheritance-related issues that have become more complex after the Constitutional Court's decision and thoroughly prepare for the complexity of the proof relationship, such as the degree of unconstitutional behavior and contribution to the reserved portion, in inheritance disputes related to the reserved portion that are continuously increasing in the future." “In the case of a lawsuit, the outcome of the lawsuit may vary depending on the lawyer’s capabilities, so more professional lawyers are likely to be preferred,” he predicted. Help = Lawyer Yongdu Park, Daeryun Inheritance and Gasa Group, Law Firm (Limited). [View full article] - The reserve system is ruled unconstitutional for the first time in 47 years... The outlook for future oil refund claim lawsuits is:

◀ Anchor ▶ The conflict between the government and the Medical Association has been going on for more than two months, and the policy to increase the number of medical school students by 2,000 students, which was used as an excuse, is facing a critical juncture in the court. In relation to the application to suspend the increase in medical school capacity raised by the medical community, this is because the court said that it would receive evidence on the increase from the government and consider it. It also requested that the increase not be confirmed until the middle of this month. Which issue will be the key variable? Reporter Jeon Dong-hyuk pointed it out. ◀ Report ▶ Last month, the application for 'suspension of medical school expansion' filed by medical school professors, residents, and medical students was 'dismissed' without even receiving a decision from the trial court. Since the direct stakeholder in the expansion is the university president, it was deemed that professors, residents, etc. had no right to raise an objection. However, the appeals court of the Seoul High Court ruled that the president who benefits from the expansion is legally entitled to it. It was pointed out that there was no reason to enter into a dispute. Therefore, the court indicated that it would judge not only the eligibility of the applicants but also the legality of the decision to increase the number of personnel. It requested the government to detail the basis for the '2,000-person increase', from on-site inspection results and meeting minutes to future support plans and required budget. [Nari Park/Attorney] "You can think of it as 'we will look at all the submitted materials and make a decision within a few weeks from then.' I think there is a high possibility that a decision will be made. "Given the nature of the case that examines the legality of administrative dispositions, the key issue seems to be whether the expansion of medical schools is essentially in the 'public interest'. [Seong Bong-geun/Professor at Seokyeong University (majoring in administrative law)] "The most important thing is whether it is likely to have a significant impact on public welfare. Is it a private matter that cannot protect the various interests of doctors, or is it something that serves the public interest?" Lim Hyun-taek, president of the Korean Medical Association, welcomed the court, saying it put a brake on the government's unilateral policy. [Lim Hyun-taek/President of the Korean Medical Association] "The government itself admitted that the number of 2,000 students was not even grounded in allowing national medical schools to voluntarily adjust their quota..." The final count of the increase in admissions for next year at 31 medical schools was found to be 1,469. The University Education Council said this month that the court decision was made. He announced that he will not announce plans for next year's college admissions process until the middle of the year. This is Jeon Dong-hyuk from MBC News.  [View full article] - Court trying to look into the essence… “The issue is whether the 2,000-person increase meets the ‘public interest’” (Shortcut)

The Promotion Committee refused to return the installment payment even though the project was aborted. The Local Housing Association Promotion Committee (hereinafter referred to as the Promotion Committee), which induced members to join the union by deceiving them by saying that they would return the full amount of down payment depending on the progress of the project, returned the full amount to the members. According to the legal community on the 29th, the Eastern Branch of the Busan District Court recently ruled in favor of all the plaintiffs in a lawsuit filed by union members against a Promotion Committee in the Busan region. “Pay the plaintiffs their respective contributions and administrative service fees, plus money calculated at an annual rate of 12% until the date of repayment. The defendant shall bear the costs of the lawsuit,” the order said. The union members filed a lawsuit, claiming that the Promotion Committee had induced members to join the union through the ‘Safety Guarantee System’ and made them pay tens of millions of won, but did not return the installments. The Safety Guarantee System proposed by the Promotion Committee at the time of recruitment was to protect the union in case the establishment and business of the union were to fail. This means that those who wish to join can receive a full refund, including the deposit paid. The union members who joined at the time also received a letter of confirmation of the contents. However, it was revealed that the promotion committee did not even apply for approval to establish a union to the competent government office. In particular, as the progress of the project was delayed and the outlook became unclear, the promotion committee held an extraordinary general meeting and dissolved the union, citing conflict among members and project delays due to an increase in project costs, and gave up all rights related to the project. Nevertheless, the promotion committee did not want to return the amount paid, and as a result, some union members were suffering from hardships. Accordingly, the union members filed a lawsuit against the local housing association to hold the promotion committee responsible for the return of contributions due to the failure of the project. The legal representative for the union members argued that the contributions paid by the union members should be returned in accordance with the guarantee of security for the union members and the agreement on dissolution and settlement of the union. An official from Daeryun Law Firm (Limited), who acted as legal representative for the union members, said, “If there had been no agreement to guarantee return, the plaintiffs would not have signed the subscription agreement in this case.” “After emphasizing the existence of intentional deception, the promotion committee returned the contribution as unfair profits,” he explained. He added, “Deceiving the victims with ridiculous exaggerated advertisements is a clear crime of fraud,” and added, “If you want to withdraw your subscription after depositing the membership fee or withdraw your membership against the promotion committee or the union, you must actively prove intentional deception in court, but the reality is that it is not easy to prove.”  [View full article] - Busan local housing association whose project failed... Court: Full installment payment must be returned to union members (link)

The key is whether or not the actual action was taken, and whether or not the contract was leaked will also likely be an issue. As the conflict between the agency Hive and its subsidiary Adore CEO Min Hee-jin led to a police complaint, attention is focused on whether Hive's allegations of CEO Min's breach of duty will be proven. The legal community believes that it is not easy to acknowledge Representative Min's charges of breach of trust in terms of the content and target of the breach of trust based solely on the circumstances that have been disclosed to date. However, both sides can file additional charges, so there is room for the investigation to expand to other charges. According to the opinions of lawyers and legal scholars on the 28th, in order for CEO Min to be charged with breach of trust in business, the key question is whether there was an ‘actual act’ and, if so, whether this act caused damage to ‘Adore’, where Min Hee-jin is serving as CEO, not Hive, the largest shareholder. Breach of trust in business is not punished in the preliminary or conspiracy stages. ‘Initiation or commencement of implementation’ is necessary. Attorney Park Hoon said in a phone call with the Hankyoreh on this day, “In order to establish a charge of breach of trust in business, there must be evidence that CEO Min initiated specific actions, such as ‘writing a contract to take in New Genes,’ rather than saying, ‘I will take New Genes.’” He added, “It is also difficult to punish the issue of seizing management rights just for what was said in a messenger.” A charge of breach of trust in business is committed when the management causes damage to the company. This does not apply when damage is caused to shareholders. Therefore, in this case, even if there was ‘initiation or commencement of execution’, the victim of CEO Min’s breach of trust in business is only ‘Corporation Adore’ and cannot be ‘largest shareholder Hive’, which holds 80% of Adore’s shares. The most famous precedent in this regard is the Supreme Court ruling in the case of the issuance of Everland convertible bonds at a low price in connection with the succession of management rights to Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Jae-yong in 2009. At the time, the Supreme Court acquitted former Samsung Group Chairman Lee Kun-hee and others on charges of breach of trust under the logic that even if convertible bonds were issued at a low price, this was only a ‘loss to shareholders’ and not a ‘damage to the company.’ However, if CEO Min’s ‘leak of the contract’, which Hive is taking issue with, is true and this ultimately caused damage to Adore, the possibility of various criminal punishments, including breach of duty, is open. On the 26th, Hive side refuted CEO Min's press conference held the day before and claimed, "We conducted (the audit) after confirming that documents classified as management secrets were leaked." Attorney Taejeong Yang (Gwangya Law Firm) said, "If (Hive's) story that Vice President Adore leaked Hive's internal financial data and artist contract data and planned a strategy is correct, then it is a trade secret under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act. “It can be seen as a leak that has damaged the stock price or image of the company Adore (rather than the shareholder hive),” he said. Attorney Jeong Jin-kwon (Soul Law Firm) said, “If you showed personnel data to a third party, such as a shaman, you could be accused of violating the Personal Information Protection Act.” There are many predictions that the dispute between Hive and CEO Min will escalate into a civil lawsuit in the future. Attorney Jeong Jin-kwon said, “In a situation where Hive, the majority shareholder, has requested to convene a general shareholders’ meeting to dismiss Representative Min, Representative Min may file a lawsuit confirming the invalidity of the general shareholders’ resolution or a provisional injunction to confirm director status in order to maintain his position.” Attorney Ji Min-hee (Daeryun Law Firm) said, “There is a possibility that (Hive) may file a claim for damages due to infringement of trade secrets, etc.” Regarding the accusation from Hive's CEO Min, an official at the Yongsan Police Station stated, "We will review the complaint and then look into the charges."  [View full article] - Can ‘business breach of trust’ be applied to Min Hee-jin? (Shortcut)

Daeryun Law Firm "Achieving severe punishment for perpetrators and priority protection for victims" As the amendment to the Act on Prevention and Countermeasures of School Violence (School Violence Prevention Act) came into effect on March 1, victims who were in unfair situations were relieved. According to the coverage of <The Fact> on the 25th, recently, A, a student at a high school in Busan, continued to be bullied for no reason by his classmate B. On the day of the incident, B indiscriminately assaulted his face and other areas. Person A, who was being attacked, was referred to the School Violence Response Review Committee on the grounds that Person B raised his hands in defense despite being unilaterally assaulted. Person A, who was unfairly accused of being a perpetrator of school violence in this incident, complained of not only physical damage requiring more than three weeks of treatment, but also mental damage so severe that he was unable to attend school. Accordingly, Person A's legal representative proved that it was an act of defense against violence and that Person B had not been harmed. In the end, Person B was the victim. He was sent to the prosecution on charges of injury after being banned from contacting, intimidating, or retaliating against others and being given a class change. Mr. A was cleared of the false accusation and received protection measures for victims of school violence. An official of Mr. A's legal representative, Daeryun Law Firm (Lihan), said, "Thanks to accompanying the school violence committee and emphasizing the unfairness of the victim, we were able to receive treatment and care for treatment." He said, "It was possible to provide priority protection to victims." According to the revised law, if a perpetrator of school violence is suspended from attendance (No. 6), changed class (No. 7), or transferred school (No. 3), the school records will be preserved for 4 years, up from the existing 2 years. In the case of dispositions 6 and 7, the proviso that allowed deletion through deliberation just before graduation was maintained. However, even if a record of school violence is deleted after deliberation right before graduation, the standards for deletion are strictly defined, including that there must be a sincere apology from the perpetrator. An official from Daeryun explained, "Even if a perpetrator who has received a severe punishment for school violence commits a third or fourth attempt after graduating from high school, the perpetrator must apply for college admission with the student record on which the punishment for school violence is recorded. This means that it can affect not only college admissions but also employment." He added, "As the trend of strict punishment for school violence spreads, the future is bright." He added, “The practice of granting impunity to perpetrators of school violence in the name of punishment has disappeared.”  [View full article] - With the implementation of the revised school violence prevention law, victims who are accused of being perpetrators are freed from the injustice they feel (Go here)

17After finishing his career as a judge in 2018, he became a lawyer this year."Meeting with those who need help with the rest of their legal life"To a juvenile offender '10call disposition' The scene is still talked about today"not a bad memory, If you get a chance to look back on yourself"  "mother wake up OOO Would you like to stand next to me?? (To my mother) 'Sorry for worrying you. This will never happen again'say", "I will dispose of it. 10I'm disposing of it. 7You can appeal to the court within 12 days."2013year 8aired on monday KBS 1TV documentary 'children in crisis-boy, go to court' a scene in. At the time, Judge Park Na-ri of the Suwon District Court Juvenile Department, who seemed to be lenient on juvenile delinquents, imposed the strongest punishment under the Juvenile Act. 10Years later, it is still talked about. thanks 'pumpkin judge'He was nicknamed 17I left the courthouse where I worked for years., This year, I started my second life as a lawyer.. 25Day 'my61law day'To mark the occasion, we met Na-ri Park, chief general counsel at Daeryun Law Firm..Attorney Park has been a judge for half of his legal career., The remaining half said they started their careers as lawyers to help their clients.. Attorney Park "It was rewarding, but I wanted to spend the rest of my legal career helping and meeting people in need."He said.Attorney Park became a hot topic. '10call disposition' He said he was somewhat cautious about commenting on the incident.. Attorney Park "'cider'There was also a reaction that said 'Have you ever thought about what your child's life would be like?'There was also a comment saying. I was worried too"as "I don't know what happened after that., I hope that memory from that time will not be a bad memory in your life, but a good opportunity to reflect on yourself."said.mudfish "When I started working as a lawyer, I received a call saying that I had previously been tried as a juvenile. SNScame through"as "That friend 'Since the trial, I have calmed down and have grown into a healthy member of society and am living a good life.. thank you'and said. I thought it was fortunate, I hope the friends who appeared on the show are doing well too."added. Attorney Park recalled that the case in which he served as the first independent criminal judge and sentenced the first not guilty during his time as a judge was also memorable.. he is "It was a case of theft. I left something in the bathroom and when I went back, it was gone., It was a case in which the accused was accused of taking the items out due to time constraints.. the only evidence CCTVI checked carefully, but, He was acquitted because it was judged that there was insufficient proof of guilt., The prosecution did not appeal and the acquittal was confirmed."as "I still remember the scene where the defendant was very grateful."He said.A hot potato in the judiciary recently. 'trial delay'About "It's very frustrating, but there's no solution."He expressed his opinion. Attorney Park "In criminal cases without detention, only the first date is scheduled. 1I heard it will take more than a year. After the incident 4Sometimes it takes more than a year to be sentenced., too slow. However, it is not a matter that can be resolved by an individual judge, as resolution requires an overall plan."He said.finally 'What kind of lawyer do you want to be?'About he "You may want a lawyer who can go to court and clearly convey what he wants to say., favorable 'result'I think it is the lawyer's job to lead the way."as "Even if the client makes a specific request, if it is not in the client's interest, you also need charisma to firmly persuade the client.. I want to become a lawyer that clients can trust and follow."He emphasized. The following is a Q&A with Attorney Park..-After serving as a judge for a long time, I started my career as a lawyer.2I started my life. Was there a special occasion?."one 17I worked as a judge for about a year.. 27Start at age now 40I'm in my mid-teens, one 60If I were to live as a lawyer for the rest of my life, I felt like I was halfway through it.. There were rewards along the way, I thought it would be fun to spend the rest of my legal career using my experience so far to face and directly help people in need..-Do you feel the difference between the work of a judge and a lawyer?."The judge can predict the schedule for a month. You can predict and adjust which days you will work and which days you will write the judgment.. Lawyers are unpredictable.. Counseling can be arranged suddenly., The trial schedule has no choice but to follow what the court determines.. Adaptable to the court and client 'second'There is this part. But it's fun. No one comes to the judge first., Often feels uncomfortable around people. There are people who need me as a lawyer.. When someone asks for help, I have the heart to respond, so I think that's a good fit.."-While serving as a juvenile judge, he was a juvenile delinquent. '10call disposition'The footage from the documentary that took down is still being talked about.. What do you think is the reason?."Actually, I don't usually do things like that during trials.. There was also filming for a broadcast at the time., The child's mother came out. I thought that if I left the court, the child would not have a chance to interact with his mother or reflect on himself.. However, because that cannot change the already decided conclusion, the sentence was passed., I think that's what impressed people.."-at that time 10Is there any reaction you remember regarding the disposition of the call??"become a lawyer SNSWhen I started, I received a lot of recognition comments.. one side 'Have you ever thought about what your child's life will be like after that??'There was also someone who left a comment saying. I was worried too. I don't know what happened to that friend afterwards, but, I hope that this will not be a bad memory in his life, but a good opportunity to reflect on himself.. Besides that friend, recently SNSthrough 'In the past, I was tried as a juvenile by a judge several times.'had been contacted. 'I am grateful that after the trial, I came to my senses and am now growing up as a healthy member of society and living a good life.'He said. I felt so fortunate, I hope the friend who appeared on the show is doing well too.."-Aside from the juvenile trial, please tell us about any other trials that were worthwhile or memorable.."When I first took over as the sole detective, I remember my first acquittal case.. It was a case of theft. I left something in the bathroom and when I went back, it was gone., entrance CCTVUpon checking, it was a case in which the defendant was indicted on the charge that he may have taken the item due to time constraints.. the only evidence CCTVI checked carefully, but, He was acquitted because it was judged that there was insufficient proof of guilt.. The prosecution did not appeal and the acquittal was confirmed.. I still remember the scene where the defendant was very grateful during the sentencing.. I remember it because I felt like I was able to resolve a real injustice.."-Recently, the judiciary 'trial delay' The issue is being discussed as a major topic.."In criminal cases, appellate trials are held when the defendant is without detention. 1I heard that the first due date has not been scheduled for years.. Arrest cases have a detention period, so they are scheduled first, so they keep getting pushed back.. In this case, after the start of the first trial, 4There are many cases where more than a year passes. There are times when the crime was committed and there is too much delay in the implementation of justice.. Even in civil cases 1There are many cases where it takes about a year.. It's very frustrating, but I don't think there's any clear solution.. It is not something that can be accomplished through the efforts of individual judges, but something that must be planned as a whole.."-As Daeryun’s chief general counsel, 'General litigation/Arbitration Center Director'took charge of. What kind of work is it?."The role is to guide junior lawyers to develop their expertise by allocating general civil cases and arbitration cases that do not fall into specific categories such as real estate or corporations, taking into account the aptitude or ability of the lawyers involved.. It was also responsible for reaching an appropriate agreement between companies and parties before proceeding with litigation.. It’s new to be in charge of something I couldn’t do as a judge.."-'some lawyer'If you have a goal of remaining as?"Ultimately, clients want someone who will fight for their interests.. at last 'winning lawsuit'is to say. Of course, you may want a lawyer who can clearly convey what you want to say in court, but, better than that 'result'I think it is the lawyer's job to lead the way.. Even if the client makes a specific request, if it is not beneficial to the client, 'firmly' I think you also need charisma to persuade.. I want to become a lawyer that clients can trust and follow.."  [View full article] - [law day interview] Na-ri Park, Attorney “Sometimes clients also ‘firmly’ I will persuade you” (Go to)

Daeryun, Headquarters relocated to Park One Tower, including regional areas and nationwide 38Owns 10 offices200Law firm with more than 100 lawyers resident in each office, plans to enter New York, USA next year(finite) overdue 15On Sunday, an opening ceremony for the headquarters relocation was held at Park One Tower in Yeouido, Seoul, announcing the start of the Yeouido era.. At the opening ceremony on this day, not only Daeryun insiders such as Kim Kuk-il, Jeong Chan-woo, Go Byeong-jun, and Park Dong-il, but also the recent22Korea Association for the Rehabilitation of the Disabled, including attorney Bo-yoon Choi, who was elected as a proportional representative for the People's Future in the National Assembly election.·㈜Thomson Reuters Korea, Korea Force Securities㈜·LGExternal stakeholders, including chemicals, attended.. Achieving continuous growth as a customer-friendly law firm At the opening ceremony, CEO Chan-Woo Jeong said, “‘Customer-centric, professionalism, and trust’Daeryun's symbolic color represents Daeryun's commitment to doing its best to provide the best legal services to customers.”as “Park One Tower, which stands out with its red lighting even at night, is even more meaningful as it is in line with the red color, the symbolic color of Daeryun.”It was said. Daeryun is currently nationwide 38We have 100 offices., 200More than 100 lawyers reside in each office.. We have achieved continuous growth as a customer-friendly law firm by breaking down existing law offices and opening several branches not only in front of the courthouse but also in regional areas.. This head office relocation was also decided to provide prompt legal services focused on corporate customers in Yeouido, where large corporations and the financial sector are concentrated.. Daeryun said that preparations have been completed to provide the best legal services.. We operate our own evidence investigation, digital forensics, and security groups and have built a system to enable professional and strategic response by securing evidence.. Serious disaster responseTF, Election responseTF We provide prompt legal support by forming a team appropriate for the situation.. CEO Jeong “Experts such as lawyers, patent attorneys, and accountants active in various fields such as corporate law, criminal affairs, rehabilitation and bankruptcy, defense and military, medical, civil affairs, and domestic affairs collaborate to provide the best legal services.”as “In particular, many companies and medical corporations have recently MOUis concluding. By relocating the headquarters to Yeouido, faster contact became possible., We expect to provide legal advice in a timely manner.”said. Daeryun’s domestic expansion was a challenge to resolve legal blind spots.. We have created a legal culture in which local governments can receive the same legal services as the head office.. With this as a foundation, Daeryun rose to the ranks of large law firms.. Based on its solid position in Korea, it plans to expand into overseas markets, including Japan and the United States, starting next year.. The plan is to increase the competitiveness of domestic law firms by taking advantage of advanced overseas legal services.. CEO Kook-il Kim “Daeryun is a detective, corporate legal affairs, national defense military, medical dispute, We are actively helping various groups, including construction and real estate, to develop expertise.”as “We are opening an office closest to our customers so that they can find Daeryun no matter where they are.. Taking advantage of these strengths, Japan next year will, We plan to enter New York, USA next year.. We expect that this will allow us to provide more professional legal services.”explained. CEO Park Dong-il commented on the selection of Japan and the United States as target countries for overseas expansion by improving competitiveness through advanced overseas legal services. “Generally, Southeast Asia is chosen to generate profits, but, Daeryun plans to advance into places with advanced laws rather than profits.”as “Daeryun already has enough capabilities to present it to the world.. We will increase competitiveness by adopting advanced overseas legal service systems.”explained. The opening ceremony ended with a closing speech by CEO Park Dong-il.. Representative Park “The reason the company has been able to grow is because we have worked hard to realize the value of protecting the rights and interests of our customers.”He said “Daeryun's ultimate goal is to ensure that customers are impressed by Daeryun's skills and sincerity.”He emphasized that. Representative Park finally said “Daeryun’s goal is Korea 1This is the law firm above.”as “We will continue to strive to provide the best legal services with professional lawyers who pursue the same goal.. Please watch Daeryun’s challenges and achievements.”He said. [View full article] JoongAng Ilbo - Opening the full-fledged era of Yeouido with the best customer-centered legal services (Go to)Edaily - Daeryun Law Firm, Headquarters relocated to Yeouido…“Focus on corporate law” (Go to)Money Today - law firm(finite) Daeryun, Headquarters expansion and relocation…"Focus on corporate law and prepare for overseas expansion" (Go to)Financial News - Daeryun nested in Yeouido "Focus on corporate law…Preparing to enter the US and Japan" (Go to)Asian Economy - law firm(finite) Daeryun, Headquarters relocation opening ceremony completed…"The first step toward becoming a global law firm" (Go to)KBCnews - Daeryun Law Firm, Headquarters expansion and relocation to Park One, Yeouido (Go to)Etoday - The opening of the Yeouido era ‘Daeryun Law Firm’…‘finance+corporate law’ Two-track reinforcement [law firm人+law firmIN] (Go to)Loishu - law firm(finite) Daeryun, Headquarters relocation opening ceremony completed…“A leap forward as a global law firm” (Go to)KNNnews - Daeryun Law Firm, Headquarters relocated to Yeouido, Seoul (Go to)legal newspaper - Daeryun Law Firm, 'Yeouido'Headquarters moved to… “Corporate-oriented legal services” (Go to)

Daeryun Law Firm (Liuhan), which specializes in serious criminal cases such as serial murders, organized violence crimes, and drug smuggling, announced on the 22nd that it has recently recruited attorney Lee Gwang-woo, a former chief prosecutor, to strengthen its criminal group. Attorney Lee Gwang-woo was appointed as a prosecutor at the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office and worked as a prosecutor at the Gimcheon Branch of the Daegu District Prosecutors' Office and the Seoul Northern District Prosecutors' Office before working at the Seoul Eastern District Prosecutors' Office and the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors' Office. He served as deputy chief prosecutor. Lastly, he served as the chief prosecutor of the Daejeon District Prosecutors' Office and joined Daeryun Law Firm as a lawyer in charge of criminal cases. During his time as a prosecutor, this lawyer handled many violent crime cases, including the death and disappearance of a pastor couple, the drug smuggling case of a third-generation chaebol, the illegal leakage of private school teacher recruitment test papers, the prosecutor's office pesticide terror and arson case, and the formation of an illegal organized crime group. In particular, drug crimes and serial murder cases. Attorney Lee said, “Complex criminal cases require analyzing cases from various angles. The experience of handling numerous violent crime cases will help Daeryun achieve results in the future,” adding, “Currently, Daeryun is subdividing its criminal group and taking proactive responses from the investigation stage. Working with its experts at all stages of criminal cases. “We will prepare a strategy,” said CEO Kook-il Kim. “As society develops, criminal cases are also evolving. As the role of criminal lawyers is important in the court, we are looking forward to the performance of this lawyer who specializes in criminal cases.” He added, “At Daeryun, we have strengthened the criminal group and launched a new investigation response team. We hope to pass on this lawyer’s know-how to the Daeryun Criminal Group.” He added, “We will be able to provide a higher level of legal services to our customers as we continue to recruit lawyers who are former chief judges, prosecutors, and police investigators, while at the same time mobilizing various measures such as evidence investigation, digital forensics, collaboration with security groups, and operation of mock investigation rooms and courts.” Meanwhile, Daeryun recently relocated its headquarters to Yeouido and successfully concluded its opening ceremony. We have increased our expertise by expanding and reorganizing specialized groups in various fields, including corporate law, criminal affairs, and civil affairs, and based on this, we are providing high-quality legal services to our customers.  [View full article] Sports Seoul - Former Chief Prosecutor Lee Gwang-woo joins Daeryun Law Firm... Expectations for a lawyer specializing in criminal cases (Click here) Korea Economic Daily - Daeryun Law Firm continues to recruit specialized lawyers... “Strengthening legal advisory expertise” (Go to the link) Lo Issue - Daeryun recruits lawyer Lee Gwang-woo, a former chief prosecutor (Go to the link)

Labor law specialist registered with the Korean Bar Association... Bang In-tae, who has consistently provided corporate legal and labor-related advice to large law firms such as Insa Barun and Pacific, which specialize in human resources and labor, said, "We are not specific to one field... we can provide legal advice covering all fields." Dae-ryun, "We will do our best to recruit experts to respond to the demand for corporate legal advice." Daeryun Corporate Law Group recently recruited senior attorney Bang In-tae, a corporate and labor law specialist, and It was announced on the 22nd that it will strengthen its expertise. Attorney Bang is a labor law lawyer registered with the Korean Bar Association and specializes in corporate legal advice in the human resources and labor areas. Previously, he specialized in corporate legal affairs and labor-related advice at large law firms such as Barun Law Firm and Pacific Law Firm. He is also considered to have practical experience in the field, including serving as an in-house lawyer at Hyundai Rotem and S-1 Co., Ltd., and conducting numerous wage and severance pay lawsuits and general shareholders' meeting advice. In particular, Attorney Bang not only handles criminal cases such as the Fair Trade Act, Occupational Safety and Health Act, Labor Standards Act, Subcontracting Act, and Dispatch Act. He is known to be skilled in advising on overseas investment and joint venture establishment. Attorney Bang expressed his ambition, saying, “I have always achieved the satisfaction of corporate clients with my professional knowledge of corporate legal advice, including review of legal risks and establishment of internal systems,” and “I will show that it is possible to provide legal advice encompassing all areas of a company without being specific to one field.” Daeryun recruited lawyer Bang, who has extensive experience in criminal cases such as industrial accidents and serious accidents. In line with the expanded application of the Severe Accident Punishment Act, we expect to be able to respond quickly to legal advice for small and medium-sized businesses. Daeryun said, “With the addition of Attorney Bang, a labor law expert optimized for responding to financial and labor-related risks, we are expected to be able to respond quickly to the latest legal issues.” He added, “As we expand and reorganize our corporate legal group, many corporate clients are looking for us, and we will do our best to recruit experts to respond to this demand for corporate legal advice.” Meanwhile, Daeryun Law Firm The corporate legal group is continuing to expand and reorganize and is signing a number of corporate legal advisory MOUs.  [Corporate News] Korea Economic Daily - Daeryun Law Firm continues to recruit professional lawyers... “Strengthening legal advisory expertise” (Shortcut) Law News - Daeryun Law Firm recruits lawyer Bang In-tae, an expert in corporate and labor law (Shortcut) Daily - Daeryun Law Firm recruits lawyer Bang In-tae, specialized in corporate and labor law (Shortcut)