Press Coverage

Daeryun Law Firm (CEO Jae-guk Shim) announced that it won the loan dispute held at the 1st Civil Affairs Division of Jinju Branch, Changwon District Court on the 18th of last month. According to Daeryun Law Firm, the defendant at the time formed a natural relationship with Mr. B, the parent of his child's classmate, through volunteer work, and borrowed money from Mr. B for living expenses and did not repay it. Mr. A then further persuaded him to take out a loan from five financial institutions, including capital and savings banks, and Mr. B, who accepted this, suffered property damage worth approximately KRW 200 million. Civil lawyer Daeryun Seoul Office (Seocho-gu), who represented the plaintiff at the time, said, “If the debtor disposes of its assets and enters rehabilitation or bankruptcy proceedings, it becomes more difficult to receive money,” and “It is important to receive repayment of the debt and delay damages through a prompt lawsuit.” He said, “The case at the time was about a lawsuit requesting the return of a loan, and if you get a winning ruling and obtain the right to execute, you can select a financial institution and seize the other party’s account, etc., and if there is a balance, you can apply the amount to the claim through a collection order.” He added, “It would be helpful to deal with it with a legal assistant because there are ways to recover it.” An industry expert said, “In general, creditors who suffer from not receiving their money back often hand over the money without any special procedures out of hope, but in order to minimize economic, time, and psychological damage in the event of a legal dispute in the future, creditors must take care of their rights.” He added, “Writing out an IOU, recording, or leaving a text message is also a way to provide evidence rather than a cash transaction. “It is advisable to use surplus account transfers or check transactions that leave records,” he advised. Reporter Lim So-ra mail00@asiae.co.krView original article - https://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD∣=sec&sid1=101&oid=277&aid=0004600931

A man who introduced himself as a single woman on an application and met him sued for damages and alimony and won. According to the legal community, on the 19th, the Changwon District Court ruled that in a lawsuit filed by a man for damages against a married woman, B, he should pay 60 million won in damages according to the plaintiff's cause of claim. B introduced her husband as her brother-in-law and her children as nephews to A, and continued to date by lying about the fact that she was a married woman for nearly a year. In addition, he borrowed money from Mr. A about 100 times for reasons such as living expenses and repaying his father's debt, and when Mr. A asked him to repay the money, he blocked his calls and messages and did not repay it. Person A, who found this strange, went to Mr. B's house and found out that all of his employment information and family relations were false information. Afterwards, Mr. A filed a lawsuit against Mr. B demanding payment of damages and alimony. Accordingly, the court ruled that the woman should pay 60 million won in damages, considering that she had caused damages through illegal acts. According to a civil attorney from Daeryun Law Firm, who served as the litigation representative at the time, “We decided to proceed with a lawsuit to claim damages as a married man lied to himself that he was single and repeatedly caused financial damages,” and “We decided to file a lawsuit for damages, including embezzling cash due to fraudulent acts.” “We are in the process of filing a complaint for fraud with a criminal lawyer for matters related to unpaid money.” A criminal lawyer from Daeryun Law Firm said, “Recently, there have been frequent cases of people hiding their identity through applications and engaging in fraud for the purpose of money, so caution is needed. If you may be harmed in a similar situation, you should collect data that can be used as evidence, such as conversation content, call content, and transfer history, and seek legal assistance to resolve the matter.” Added. Reporter Lim So-ra mail00@asiae.co.krView original article - https://m.news.naver.com/read.nhn?mode=LSD&sid1=101&oid=277&aid=0004596371

Last October, a man was sentenced to a fine for sending sexually humiliating and humiliating text messages to a female neighbor and throwing an object at her, injuring her. The Western Branch of the Busan District Court sentenced Mr. A (74), who was summarily indicted on charges of injury, insult, and violation of the Special Act on the Punishment of Sexual Violence Crimes, to complete a 40-hour sexual violence treatment program and to pay a fine of 5 million won. At the time, Mr. A caused sexual shame and disgust in the victim three times. A text message containing the content was sent, and the victim broke into the victim's house and threw a plastic milk box, causing injury to the victim. The victim filed a civil claim for damages, and the court confirmed damages of 5.5 million won. According to Daeryun Law Firm (Representative Attorney Shim Jae-guk), the plaintiff's representative at the time, "The defendant frequently sent sexual harassment text messages, and the plaintiff complained of pain due to home invasions, injuries, and work interference." He continued, "We proved the plaintiff's mental damage by securing evidentiary materials such as call records, text messages, 112 report processing records, medical certificates, injury medical certificates, and fact confirmation documents." Sexual crimes do not cause trauma to victims, but can leave serious psychological damage, so if you are suffering from sexual harassment text messages, you should find a solution with the help of a professional lawyer with extensive relevant experience rather than enduring it,” he advised. Online News Team Reporter onnews@dt.co.krView original article - https://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD∣=sec&sid1=101&oid=029&aid=0002576414

[Seoul Economy] Mr. A (72), who was put on trial for violating the Licensed Real Estate Act last September, was found not guilty in the appeals court. At the time, the first trial found him guilty and sentenced him to a fine, but the 1st Criminal Division of the Changwon District Court decided that there was no proof of the crime, so it overturned the first trial judgment and declared him not guilty. According to the current Enforcement Rules of the Licensed Real Estate Brokerage Act (Article 20), the real estate agent receives remuneration for brokering sales from the brokerage client. It is stipulated that remuneration exceeding 9/1000 must not be received from either party. Mr. A, who was accused of receiving a sales brokerage fee exceeding the legal remuneration while concluding a real estate transaction worth 31 million won, denied the charge and claimed innocence, but was not accepted and was sentenced to pay a fine of 4 million won and 80% of the legal costs in February. Accordingly, a second trial was held following Mr. A's appeal, and the appellate court ruled Mr. A raised his hand. At the time, a criminal lawyer from Daeryun Law Firm, who represented Mr. A for his appeal, said, “We dug into the fact that the accuser’s statement about how and from whom the defendant received the money was being inconsistently reversed, and prepared evidence and defense.” He added, “According to Article 307, Paragraph 2 of the Criminal Procedure Act, admission of a crime must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, so we responded to the case with the goal of innocence.” He explained, “It was decisive that we were able to find irrefutable evidence, such as the fact that the money that the defendant deposited into his account on the day of the incident was repayment from a debtor in the past, and that the place, time, and amount where the plaintiffs claimed to have paid the brokerage fee were completely different.” Meanwhile, Mr. A is suing the first plaintiff for false accusation and perjury. According to Daeryun Law Firm (Representative Attorney Shim Jae-guk), the plaintiff's representative, "The accuser was able to be cleared of the charges in the second trial, but complained of mental and financial pain, including an inability to concentrate on her main job for a significant period of time during the trial." He added, "Based on the plaintiff's will to seek severe punishment for the defendants, we will hold the defendants accountable for their false accusations and perjury." / Reporter Kim Dong-ho dongho@sedaily.com View original article - https://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD∣=sec&sid1=101&oid=011&aid=0003666123

On October 17, the 1st Criminal Division of the Jinju Branch of the Changwon District Court found Mr. A (50), a local newspaper reporter, not guilty on charges of attempted extortion and extortion. The prosecutor charged defendant A with attempted extortion and extortion, saying that while he was working as a reporter for a local newspaper, he published articles criticizing local businesses and blackmailed them into ordering advertisements and received money in the name of advertising fees. The prosecutor's court Regarding the attempted extortion case, the witness present reportedly stated, "I have never heard from the victim that the defendant threatened or blackmailed him." Witnesses who were victims of blackmail also testified to the effect that there was no threat, saying, "There was no threat, and there was no mention of publishing a critical article." In his defense, criminal lawyer Shim Jae-guk (Daeryun Law Firm), who was appointed as the defendant's attorney at the time, said, "For a threat to constitute a blackmail charge to be recognized, there must be notice of harm that could limit a person's freedom of decision-making or frighten the person to the extent of interfering with the freedom of execution of decision." He argued, "It should not be acknowledged that the act of reporting on the illegal activities of a company run by a blackmail victim and requesting that it place an advertisement constitutes an act of extortion." In addition, regarding the defendant's charges, he cited the Supreme Court's ruling that the mere fact of reporting critical articles and editorials and requesting advertisements cannot be considered as threatening the other party as a means of blackmail. Also, regarding the charge of attempted extortion, "The defendant, a reporter for a local newspaper, receiving advertising orders is also part of his job," and said, "It is a part of the defendant's job to receive advertisements as a journalist for a local newspaper." It was argued that "reporting and writing about the irrational aspects of the county office is the right thing to do in the profession of the defendant, a newspaper reporter. Accordingly, the court declared the indictment not guilty under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act because there was no proof of a crime. Online News Team Reporter onnews@dt.co.kr View original article - https://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD∣=sec&sid1=101&oid=029&aid=0002574043

Recently, as the baby boom generation enters an aging society, the number of ‘twilight divorces’ and ‘twilight remarriages’ is rapidly increasing. Accordingly, as inheritance status changes through divorce and remarriage, issues related to inheritance are also becoming a new factor of conflict. In particular, in the case of remarriage at twilight, there are many cases where remarriage occurs with children, but this situation can also arise when both parties to the remarriage have children or when a new child is born between the remarriage parties. This is the case of Daeryun Law Firm. #The client's father remarried without informing the client, who was living abroad, and passed away after gifting his property to his spouse. However, the spouse intentionally attempted to inherit the property on his own without informing the client of this. The client, who found out about this fact late, ended up becoming embroiled in a property dispute. Accordingly, in order to determine the size of the gifted property, Daeryun calculated the basic property for the reserved portion by checking the gift tax report details, financial transaction details, and confirming the cause of real estate registration. In addition, as a result of convincing the court based on the evidence obtained after an objective and sufficient review, he won the lawsuit requesting the return of the reserved portion. A family affairs lawyer from Daeryun Law Firm, who handled the lawsuit at the time, advised that he prepare thoroughly with the help of a family lawyer, saying, “Securing the reserved portion is a difficult process for an individual to prepare alone, including identifying the basic assets of the decedent.” In particular, he advised, “The statute of limitations for the right to claim the return of a reserve is 1 year from the date of learning of the commencement of inheritance and gift, and is very short, less than 10 years from the date of commencement of inheritance, so it is most important to find a solution as soon as possible.” He continued, “As inheritance problems arising from divorce at twilight have recently increased, Daeryun Law Firm has established an inheritance team led by a family lawyer and a divorce team led by a divorce lawyer. He added, “We are building a collaborative system to prevent and respond to inheritance problems arising from divorce at dusk.” Daeryun Law Firm is currently providing professional legal assistance on complex inheritance disputes based on the practical experience it has accumulated through litigation in branches across the country, including Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Incheon, Gwangju, Daejeon, Ulsan, Suwon, Changwon, Cheongju, Jeonju, Uijeongbu, Chuncheon, Jinju, and Jeju. Daily Reporter Kim Yun-seong (kimys@dailian.co.kr) View original article - https://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD∣=sec&sid1=103&oid=119&aid=0002368588#

Recently, ‘cyber defamation’ has become a hot topic along with the unfortunate news of celebrities due to malicious comments online. Cyber ​​defamation is not just about celebrities. If you look at the ‘number of cyber defamation and insult cases’ released by the National Police Agency in October, you can see that it has increased significantly from 8,880 cases in 2014 to 15,926 cases last year. The Republic of Korea is suffering from cyber defamation and insults that occur online. Offline is no exception. There are cases where photos taken without one's knowledge are given names such as ‘00 Chung’, ‘00 Male’, or ‘00 Female’ online, causing embarrassment. In such cases, personal information such as age, occupation, and upbringing is leaked through so-called ‘doxxing,’ which creates secondary damage such as making daily life difficult. This is the case described by Busan criminal lawyer at Daeryun Law Firm. #There was an incident in which the defendant, who was dissatisfied with the class of client A, who was an instructor, expressed his dissatisfaction through a comment on social media. Mr. A tried to clear up the misunderstanding, but the defendant ignored this and even sent defamatory messages to Mr. A's personal social media acquaintances, ridiculing client A. Mr. A suffered from insomnia and depression due to stress due to this incident, and as rumors spread rapidly, lectures were canceled regardless of the facts, resulting in secondary damages. At the time, the criminal lawyer in charge weighed the case and submitted a complaint to the court for 'defamation of character and obstruction of business by reporting false facts'. As a result of responding based on the facts of the damage, including collecting evidence with effectiveness and opposing force, the court awarded 5 million won to the defendant. He explained that he was sentenced to a fine of one won. In the case of cyber defamation or insults, the speed of spread is fast and an unspecified number of people encounter it, so the damage is great and recovery is difficult. Accordingly, experts emphasized, "Waiting quietly for the situation to pass will only worsen the situation. It is important to respond quickly and reliably at an early stage to reduce damage." He also advised, “If you unintentionally become a perpetrator due to a momentary mistake, get help from a criminal lawyer with extensive case experience.” Meanwhile, Daeryun Law Firm, which is considered a large law firm in Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Incheon, Gwangju, Daejeon, Ulsan, Suwon, Changwon, Cheongju, Jeonju, Uijeongbu, Chuncheon, Jinju, and Jeju, opened its Seoul office on the 25th. In particular, legal consultations are provided by specialized lawyers in each field, such as criminal lawyers, civil lawyers, domestic affairs lawyers, and divorce lawyers. Detailed information can be found on the official website. E-Newspaper Internet Reporter Hyeong In-woo (inwoo@etnews.com) View original article - https://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD∣=sec&sid1=103&oid=030&aid=0002854444#

[Seoul Economy] Criminal cases can be faced with unfavorable situations without the assistance of a lawyer at the beginning of the case, so experts believe that it is important to respond early through accurate legal analysis with the help of a criminal lawyer whenever possible. According to Daeryun Law Firm, a large law firm, it advises that in the case of criminal cases, it is important to find contradictions in sharply conflicting claims through analysis of professional statements by criminal lawyers. This is a case in which Daeryun was in charge of defending the defendant. There is a defendant and a victim who are living together ahead of marriage. An argument broke out when the drunk victim saw a toothbrush in the bathroom and suspected the defendant of an affair. As a result, the victim died while receiving treatment for subdural hemorrhage, and the defendant was indicted on charges of manslaughter, but was acquitted. The lawyer in charge at the time solved the case based on the principle of evidential trial as stipulated in the Criminal Procedure Act. Particular attention was paid to the pattern of the wound. In response to the prosecution's opinion that the defendant injured the victim and caused her death, they emphasized the defendant's statement that the victim fell on the living room floor. In addition, it was claimed that the victim was drunk and that the floor was slippery due to the soju bottle thrown at the defendant and the food on the table that was overturned. Additionally, the victim's body, which suffered from alcoholic liver disease, was prone to bruises even from minor external forces. It was based on the autopsy report showing that there were no injuries on the victim's body parts such as the head and neck except for the back of the head, and the fact that there were no signs of an attempt to defend against assault. In addition, after the victim fell and the suspect called 119, he checked again whether 119 was dispatched and took rescue measures, the testimony of the first paramedic who responded that there were no signs of a struggle, the fact that the bloodstains found at the scene of the damage were the defendant's, and the fact that the victim was The trial was led by the fact that they spoke on the phone for two minutes immediately afterward. Accordingly, the court declared the defendant not guilty, saying, "In a criminal trial, the admission of a crime must be based on strict evidence with the probative power to create confidence beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence submitted by the prosecutor alone is not enough to admit the indictment, and there is no other evidence to admit it." “In general, in situations where an explanation is needed due to unfair charges, it is important to appoint a criminal lawyer from the early stage to proceed with the case,” he said. “Above all, we must carefully analyze the case, collect evidence, and create a logical structure to refute the indictment to lead the trial.” Meanwhile, Daeryun Law Firm, which is scheduled to open a new Seoul office on the 25th, currently has criminal lawyers, civil lawyers, divorce lawyers, We have a lawyer specializing in domestic affairs./Reporter Kim Dong-ho dongho@sedaily.com View original article - https://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD∣=sec&sid1=101&oid=011&aid=0003654314

As voice phishing crimes become more sophisticated, the types of damage are becoming more diverse. In addition to victims who have suffered financial damage by impersonating government agencies such as prosecutors, police, and the Financial Supervisory Service or by threatening to kidnap family members, the number of people who are being punished by voice phishing through exposure of bank account or personal transaction information is increasing. The above voice phishing intermediate delivery and withdrawal methods take advantage of the recent economic recession by finding account numbers and depositing large amounts of unidentified money using emergency loans as bait, and then requesting remittance due to a deposit error or △ citing employment. The methods are also becoming more diverse, such as requesting an account number, check card, and password to withdraw the money deposited by the victim; calling with a caller ID limit to send cash and requesting proxy purchase of Bitcoin; requesting that the proceeds deposited by the customer be remitted to a borrowed-name account for tax reduction. In addition, malicious code is planted through text messages and applications through smartphones, and when the victim calls the financial institution to confirm, they are connected to the call center of a voice phishing organization. Therefore, they can undoubtedly be involved in crime. The punishment for this is not light. Even if there was no criminal intent, it is difficult to avoid liability if a victim is incurred through an act such as renting a bank account. Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act can result in imprisonment of up to 3 years or a fine of up to 20 million won, and fraud, which involves obtaining property benefits through deceptive acts, is punishable by up to 10 years in prison or a fine of up to 20 million won. In the case of aiding and abetting fraud, the punishment varies depending on the degree of participation in the fraud. According to Daeryun Law Firm, in order to avoid being deceived by a fraud method and becoming an unwitting accomplice in a voice phishing crime, it is advised to contact a criminal lawyer immediately after learning of the damage and respond clearly from the beginning. Even if they claim to be unfair, the actual voice phishing gang member also claims, “I didn’t know because I was fooled by a high-paying part-time job advertisement,” so it is not easy to prove innocence without legal help. Dae-ryun is a similar case. He was tricked into lending four of his check cards by asking for his check card and password because he needed account information to get a part-time job. He said that he helped a client involved in the case with a voice phishing intermediate method and ended up with a small fine. Law firm. Shim Jae-guk, a criminal lawyer at Daeryun, said, "If you suddenly become involved in the crime through voice phishing, you may be punished for somewhat unfair reasons. Because statements made during the investigation stage can affect the trial, it is most important to find a criminal lawyer with experience in voice phishing cases and effectively prove that there was no intent." He added, "If you prepare a well-organized defense opinion and defense, you can reduce your sentence." Meanwhile, Daeryun Law Firm said. We operate law offices based in Seoul, Busan, Daegu, Incheon, Gwangju, Daejeon, Ulsan, Suwon, Changwon, Cheongju, Jeonju, Uijeongbu, Chuncheon, Jinju, and Jeju. We have many successful cases of voice phishing fraud acquittals, and we are receiving good reviews in the industry by forming a professional task force team composed of specialized lawyers, paralegals, and legal clerks in each field for all lawsuits, and providing customized responses. For more details and inquiries, please visit Daeryun Law Firm's official website and representative number. [Photo = Representative Attorney Shim Jae-guk of Daeryun Law Firm] (Reporter Yeo Dong-eun deyuh@mydaily.co.kr) View original article - https://news.naver.com/main/read.nhn?mode=LSD∣=sec&sid1=102&oid=117&aid=0003294636

■ talk : Attorney Jayoung Yoon■ progress : Reporter Ho-sang Lee▷Lee Ho-sang : It's Lawyer's Eye Time. I am connected to lawyer Jayoung Yoon again today.. Lawyer, Are you with me?·▶Jayoung Yoon : yes, hello. This is Jayoung Yoon.▷Lee Ho-sang : yes, Lawyer. How have you been?·▶Jayoung Yoon : yes, I'm doing well.▷Lee Ho-sang : The first incident to consider, After causing a car accident, he disappeared after only asking the victim how he was doing. 50big, You were sentenced to a fine.·▶Jayoung Yoon : yes. AMr. Past 5month 16work morning 11I was crossing the crosswalk on a road in Cheongwon-gu, Cheongju-si. 9fat BI hit a sheep with my car.. but AImmediately after the accident, Mr. BThey simply asked the sheep how they were doing and did not inform their guardians or the police.. It is also known that he left the scene of the incident without leaving any information such as his name or contact information that could identify him.. one side, BBecause of this accident, the sheep 2I suffered an injury that required weekly treatment.. Accordingly, the prosecution AViolation of the Act on Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes, etc., Fine for fleeing and causing injury 5A summary indictment was filed for one million won.. AHe claimed that he had taken all protective measures.. now ADuring the trial, when he saw the victim's condition, he said that the victim responded that he was fine and claimed that he had fulfilled his obligation to provide relief under the Road Traffic Act.. Accordingly, although the court was able to recognize that there was a high possibility of injury if one collided with a person, 9to three children "Are you okay?·"After emphasizing that he only bitten the victim, he did not provide any name or contact information of the defendant and left the scene without contacting the victim with a guardian, etc., which is in violation of the Road Traffic Act. 54It was pointed out that the obligation to take rescue measures stipulated in Article 2 was not fulfilled.. So, the court ruled that the penalty imposed by the summary order was too low and that the penalty was increased, saying that the victim was shocked in the children's protection zone and no protective measures were taken, and that the defendant had the young victim appear in court as a witness at the defendant's insistence. 7Sentenced to one million won.▷Lee Ho-sang : This means the court decided that the man ran away.. Without taking protective measures. I think any driver can encounter this type of situation.. And on the contrary, Lawyer. Please explain to me what actions a driver should take when an accident like this occurs so that we can prove that he did not run away..▶Jayoung Yoon : yes, When a traffic accident occurs, sometimes the victim has no injuries., There may be cases where people say they are fine but strongly discourage hospital treatment.. Even in this case, the precedent states that even though the victim was aware of the fact that he had suffered a casualty, he did not take protective measures and left the scene of the accident, resulting in a situation in which it was impossible to determine who caused the accident., I think it's a case of running away without taking action.. In particular, if the victim is a minor, the guardian must be contacted or confronted., If you cannot contact your guardian, You will need to contact the police and explain the situation.. Also, as in the above situation, believing that the victim is okay and not taking any action can constitute a crime of fleeing causing injury.. Now, as I mentioned earlier, in order to prevent this situation, it is necessary to obtain your personal information as well as the cooperation of the police..▷Lee Ho-sang : Then, lawyer, For example, if we caused this accident,, Giving a business card to the injured person, Is it okay to this extent?·▶Jayoung Yoon : yes, As mentioned in the previous precedent, if the person who caused the accident can be confirmed, it is difficult to consider it as a runaway, so it is a good idea to hand over a business card..▷Lee Ho-sang : ah, However, just in case, the most important thing is to contact your insurance company or report it to the police and let them know that such an incident has occurred.·▶Jayoung Yoon : yes. yes.▷Lee Ho-sang : Let's find out the next incident.. Driving drunk and crashing into a building 60big, I also remember that there was news like this.. 60A suspended sentence has been handed down.·▶Jayoung Yoon : yes AMr. 2month 4work morning 2Blood alcohol concentration, which is the level for license cancellation, on a road in Jeungpyeong-eup, City Hall 0.042%While driving, he rushed into a nearby convenience store.. At the convenience store entrance BWhile Mr. was trying to avoid it, he fell and fell. 2Caution There has been an injury. AHe was put on trial on charges of causing death by driving.. The court sentenced 2probation for 1 year 4Community service while sentenced to 1 year 120Time and law-abiding driving lecture 80I gave a command to supercharge my time.. The court AAlthough his blood alcohol content is relatively high, he is reflecting on his crime., It was ruled that the sentence was decided considering the fact that he was supporting his elderly mother alone..▷Lee Ho-sang : We have handled many drunk driving cases., What I feel every time is that in a drunk driving case, I end up committing a crime again., So, I think there are a lot of cases of repeat offenders.. Nevertheless, probation. In the case of more habitual criminals, isn't the sentence harsher? However, in this case, he was a habitual offender and even rushed into a convenience store, but he was given probation.. It seems like I've been treated with a lot of leniency..▶Jayoung Yoon : AMr. too 2008fined for drunk driving 100It is known that a summary order of 10,000 won was received.. A considerable amount of time has passed since the first time you were punished for drunk driving.. As stated in the ruling, the fact that he is reflecting on the crime appears to have been taken into consideration as a sentencing factor..▷Lee Ho-sang : okay. When the lawyer explained earlier, I looked at the court's decision and the defendant. So, you said that the fact that the drunk driver was supporting his elderly mother on his own was also taken into consideration.. There seem to be some cases where the level of punishment is lowered when the defendant is the only family member with financial ability..▶Jayoung Yoon : yes it is. When a defendant who is the only member of the family engaged in economic activities is arrested, whether the livelihood of the rest of the family may actually be threatened is sometimes referred to as sentencing data.. Economic activity is one of the many sentencing factors, but these circumstances do not necessarily mean a reduced sentence or a suspended sentence.. In the end, if the punishment is high depending on the severity of the crime, it seems that arrest cannot be avoided even if there are such reasons..▷Lee Ho-sang : If you are responsible for the livelihood of your family, you should never drink and drive.. Let's find out the last incident.. Company money over the years 13Hundreds of millions of won. That's amazing. 30teen women. There was a case where a heavy sentence was handed down..▶Jayoung Yoon : yes. I was in charge of fund management at a company located in Cheongju. AMr. Past 2013year 2from month 2020year 2until approx. 7years 99company money over time 13Sentenced to prison after being indicted on charges of embezzling hundreds of millions of won 6sentenced to years. AMr. Manipulated the transaction details in the name of paying the CEO an advance payment.. It is known that the company's funds were thus embezzled.. It is known that he even used his own daughter's savings account to hide his crime.. This money in the end AIt is known that he used it for personal purposes such as living expenses and stock investment.. The court AThe period of the crime against Mr.. The scale of the embezzlement is said to be large, and it appears that the victim's crime has also had an impact on the financial difficulties of the victim company.. He pointed out that there was no serious effort to recover from the damage and stated the reason for the sentencing on the grounds that the crime was very thorough and planned, so the crime was very serious..▷Lee Ho-sang : You said the crime was not very good.. It suddenly occurred to me, lawyer, what is the difference between general embezzlement and business-related embezzlement?·▶Jayoung Yoon : First of all, let me briefly talk about embezzlement. Embezzlement is a crime in which a person who keeps another person's property embezzles it or refuses to return it. 5imprisonment of up to one year. 1,500be subject to a fine of less than 10,000 won. To put it simply, if you rent a car and do not return it even when the rental period is over, it can be embezzlement.. In the above case, it can be considered business embezzlement.. Embezzlement at work will result in harsher punishment.. When a person who keeps another person's property for work commits an act like this, the crime of business embezzlement is committed.. Therefore, unlike general embezzlement 10imprisonment of up to one year. 3,000It is subject to a fine of not more than 10,000 won.. As in the above situation, the amount of embezzlement is 5If it is over 100 million won, a specific law applies and weapons or 5You can be punished by imprisonment for more than one year..▷Lee Ho-sang : liver big 30It's a teenage woman. 13You stole hundreds of millions of won.. All right. Attorney, thank you for your words today. 2See you again in a week.▶Jayoung Yoon : thank you.▷Lee Ho-sang : until now 'lawyer's eyes' You worked with lawyer Jayoung Yoon.. source : BBS NEWS(https://news.bbsi.co.kr)View original article - http://news.bbsi.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=3039622