Legal Intellectual
Daeryun specialist lawyers will answer your questions.
Q
Under fintech regulation, is it a problem to operate a simple payment service without a separate license or authorization?
Views4,905
I am developing a simple payment system in order to add a payment function to our own platform. I am reviewing a structure that processes the payment flow internally without using an external payment gateway company, and I am in a situation where I am not certain whether this method is subject to a separate license or authorization. Because some functions have already been implemented, I also need to confirm whether it could become a problem if it leads to operation. In this case, I would like to know what the criteria are for determining whether it is subject to fintech regulation.
fintech regulation
Answer to Related Inquiry
Author: 김국일
Depending on its structure, a simple payment service may constitute an electronic financial business, and if it is operated without a license or authorization, it may be subject to punishment for a violation of fintech regulation.
In particular, if it takes a form that intervenes in the flow of the user's funds, the possibility that the relevant statutes apply is high.
The Electronic Financial Transactions Act defines the case of receiving the user's funds to process payments, or issuing and managing a means of payment, as an electronic financial business.
In this case, it may constitute a payment gateway business (PG business) or a business of issuing and managing prepaid electronic payment means, and registration with the Financial Services Commission is required.
If the service is operated without going through this, as unregistered business, imprisonment for not more than 3 years or a fine of not more than 20 million won may be imposed.
In addition, if a violation of fintech regulation is recognized, administrative measures, such as an order to suspend the service and a suspension of business, may accompany criminal punishment, which may affect the business operation itself.
In particular, in cases where funds are held for a certain period during the payment process or the settlement structure is designed directly, there are many instances where whether the regulation applies becomes an issue.
In such a situation, based on the service structure, the review should center on how the flow of funds is designed and whether the user's funds are handled directly.
Accordingly, it is possible to determine whether it is subject to registration as an electronic financial business or, if necessary, to consider a plan to adjust the structure through a partnership arrangement with a registered business operator.
Taking all of this into account, a simple payment service may be classified as an electronic financial business depending on the operating method, so operating it without a license or authorization may lead to a violation of fintech regulation, and a prior review of the service structure is necessary.
Daeryun's Key Strengths

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology
More than 240 key members
1,200+ cases handled per month
* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)
more strengths
Book a legal
consultation with an attorney
All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.
Phone consultation
1800-7905
Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year


Online consultation
We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation
KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys
Related Members
View more
SeukPil LIM
T. 070-7510-2014
Experience as Chief Prosecutor, Seoul Eastern District Prosecutors' Office · Attorney specializing in Sex Crimes, Drugs, Drunk-Driving/Traffic, and Criminal Law

Cheol Kim
T. 070-5117-3709
Chief Prosecutor at the Busan District Prosecutors' Office Experience as Chief Prosecutor at the Gwangju District Prosecutors' Office

HanSik CHOI
T. 070-5221-2387
Attorney with experience as a corporate executive · Attorney specializing in fair trade law
Key Case Studies
View more- Corporate legal advisory
Advice Regarding Disciplinary and Other Measures for Workplace Harassment and Sexual Harassment
![[Labor Attorney Advisory Case] Advice Regarding Disciplinary and Other Measures for Workplace Harassment and Sexual Harassment link](/_next/image?url=%2Fimages%2Fseo_v2%2Fcircle_arrow.webp&w=48&q=75)
- Response to the investigation
Responding to an Ad Hoc FSS Examination of an Asset Management Company

- Non-referral (police)
Daeryun's Ulsan Criminal Attorney Obtained a Non-Referral Decision for a Client Charged With Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act

Related Practice Areas
View moreConsult in other languages
Popular Columns
View moreKey Points of the 2026 Amendment and Assessment of Legal Risks

Between Fintech Innovation and Regulation: Criteria for Determining Financial Business and Risk Response

Examining the Method of Applying for Designation as an Innovative Financial Service and the Points to Note Regarding Financial Services

Electronic Financial Regulations and Legal Issues to Confirm When Proceeding With Financial IT Advisory

Requirements and Review Procedure for Authorization of an Internet-Only Bank

Do you have more questions?












