Legal Intellectual

Tired of unprofessional or promotional legal answers?
Daeryun specialist lawyers will answer your questions.

Q

Under fintech regulation, is it a problem to operate a simple payment service without a separate license or authorization?

Legal IntellectualViews4,905

I am developing a simple payment system in order to add a payment function to our own platform. I am reviewing a structure that processes the payment flow internally without using an external payment gateway company, and I am in a situation where I am not certain whether this method is subject to a separate license or authorization. Because some functions have already been implemented, I also need to confirm whether it could become a problem if it leads to operation. In this case, I would like to know what the criteria are for determining whether it is subject to fintech regulation.

fintech regulation

A

Answer to Related Inquiry

Depending on its structure, a simple payment service may constitute an electronic financial business, and if it is operated without a license or authorization, it may be subject to punishment for a violation of fintech regulation.

In particular, if it takes a form that intervenes in the flow of the user's funds, the possibility that the relevant statutes apply is high.

The Electronic Financial Transactions Act defines the case of receiving the user's funds to process payments, or issuing and managing a means of payment, as an electronic financial business.

In this case, it may constitute a payment gateway business (PG business) or a business of issuing and managing prepaid electronic payment means, and registration with the Financial Services Commission is required.

If the service is operated without going through this, as unregistered business, imprisonment for not more than 3 years or a fine of not more than 20 million won may be imposed.

In addition, if a violation of fintech regulation is recognized, administrative measures, such as an order to suspend the service and a suspension of business, may accompany criminal punishment, which may affect the business operation itself.

In particular, in cases where funds are held for a certain period during the payment process or the settlement structure is designed directly, there are many instances where whether the regulation applies becomes an issue.

In such a situation, based on the service structure, the review should center on how the flow of funds is designed and whether the user's funds are handled directly.

Accordingly, it is possible to determine whether it is subject to registration as an electronic financial business or, if necessary, to consider a plan to adjust the structure through a partnership arrangement with a registered business operator.

Taking all of this into account, a simple payment service may be classified as an electronic financial business depending on the operating method, so operating it without a license or authorization may lead to a violation of fintech regulation, and a prior review of the service structure is necessary.

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney SeukPil LIM

SeukPil LIM

T. 070-7510-2014

Experience as Chief Prosecutor, Seoul Eastern District Prosecutors' Office · Attorney specializing in Sex Crimes, Drugs, Drunk-Driving/Traffic, and Criminal Law

Attorney Cheol Kim

Cheol Kim

T. 070-5117-3709

Chief Prosecutor at the Busan District Prosecutors' Office Experience as Chief Prosecutor at the Gwangju District Prosecutors' Office

Attorney HanSik CHOI

HanSik CHOI

T. 070-5221-2387

Attorney with experience as a corporate executive · Attorney specializing in fair trade law

Attorney SangKwan Nam

SangKwan Nam

T. 070-5221-0865

Experience as Chief Prosecutor [Economic Crime] at the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office · Attorney Specializing in Corporate Legal Affairs/Drunk-driving Traffic Accidents

Attorney DaeSu KIM

DaeSu KIM

T. 070-5221-2387

Legal advisory for administrative agencies such as Busan City · Attorney Specializing in Administrative/Accounting Supervision/Finance/Corporate Law

Key Case Studies

View more

Related Practice Areas

View more

Consult in other languages

Popular Columns

View more
Quick Menu

Chat