Practice Areas

International Arbitration

International arbitration is a procedure in which the disputing parties appoint an arbitrator to have the case decided. International arbitration saves time and cost in its procedure, and the arbitral decision has legal binding force.

1. International Arbitration | Understanding the System and Strategies for Use

Daeryun explanation of the concept of international arbitration

International arbitration is a system that can be used when a method of resolving cross-border disputes is needed as global transactions increase.

Where the contracting counterparty is a foreign company, it is difficult to expect sufficient legal protection through domestic civil litigation alone.

What can be used in this situation is the international arbitration procedure.

International arbitration is a method of resolving a dispute according to procedures and an institution agreed upon in advance by the parties, in place of a court trial, and many companies prefer it because it offers the following advantages in particular.

Comparison of Major Arbitration Institutions

Institution

Headquarters

Advantages

ICC

Paris, France

Global credibility, suitable for complex cases

SIAC

Singapore

A neutral country, procedural efficiency

KCAB

Seoul, Korea

Low cost, Korean available, suitable for small and medium-sized enterprises

HKIAC

Hong Kong

Specialized in international finance cases

ICDR/AAA

United States

Favorable for enforcement within the United States

2. International Arbitration | Legal Concept and Effect

Explanation of binding-force issues in international arbitration by Daeryun LLC

International arbitration is a procedure in which the parties agree in advance to resolve a dispute, when it arises, through a third-party arbitrator rather than a court, and the arbitral tribunal constituted accordingly applies the governing law and renders a legally binding determination (an arbitral award).

In addition, under the New York Convention, an arbitral award rendered abroad is guaranteed to be recognized and enforced in each country.

Scope and Requirements of Arbitral Awards

Where the recognition and enforcement of a foreign arbitral award is needed, the New York Convention applies, and arbitral awards include both awards rendered by a permanent arbitral institution and those rendered by an individual arbitrator.

In addition, an arbitration agreement must be made in writing, and an arbitration clause included in a contract or a separate written arbitration agreement falls within this.

The Convention applies regardless of whether the legal relationship is contractual in nature.

Checklist for Drafting Arbitration Clauses

When inserting clause items related to international arbitration, the following items must be clearly set.

Item

Main content

Arbitration institution

Designation of an arbitration institution such as ICC, KCAB, SIAC, or HKIAC

Seat of arbitration

Affects the choice of arbitration procedure and governing law (the seat of arbitration is the physical location where the arbitration hearing proceeds)

Language of arbitration

The language to be used for handling the dispute (English, Korean, etc.)

Number of arbitrators and method of selection

Usually 1 to 3. Agreement of the parties or appointment by the institution

Governing law

The substantive law to be applied to contract interpretation and dispute resolution

Because international arbitration can be commenced once an arbitration agreement exists in writing, securing the validity of the arbitration agreement is more important than anything else.

3. International Arbitration | Selection of Arbitration Institutions and Arbitration Methods

When a company experiences international arbitration for the first time, choosing institutional arbitration rather than the ad hoc arbitration method is more stable.

Category

Institutional arbitration

Ad hoc arbitration

Definition

Conducted under the rules and administrative supervision of an arbitral institution

Conducted without the involvement of an arbitral institution

Examples

ICC, KCAB, SIAC, HKIAC, and the like

Based on the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules

Advantages

Procedural stability, expertise, and enforceability

Flexible procedure, with possible cost savings

Disadvantages

Costs such as institutional fees arise, and the procedure is complex

Concern about inefficient procedural progress in the event of conflict between the parties

Flow of International Arbitration Proceedings

1. Commencement of arbitration

  • Arbitration commences when the claimant submits a request for arbitration or an application for arbitration
  • In the case of institutional arbitration, the institution serves the documents or oversees the conduct of the procedure
  • An overview of the dispute, the requested relief, and a copy of the arbitration agreement and the like must be submitted

2. Appointment of arbitrators

  • Generally, a panel of 3 arbitrators is constituted
  • Each party nominates 1 arbitrator, and the third arbitrator is selected by agreement
  • Where selection is difficult, the arbitral institution designates them (because neutrality is important, nationality, interests, and field of expertise are considered)

3. Preparation of the procedure

  • Document exchange, the schedule for submitting written pleadings, the document production procedure and the like are agreed in advance
  • SIAC and others actively use online meetings to improve procedural efficiency

4. Document production and submission of evidence

  • A party may request the other party to submit materials, and upon refusal, grounds such as lack of relevance or materiality are required
  • Even protected documents may be submitted under a confidentiality undertaking
  • The facts may be proven through documents, witnesses, expert statements, and the like

5. Hearing

  • The parties begin with opening statements
  • Arguments are developed through examination of witnesses, cross-examination, expert testimony, and the like
  • It may proceed for up to 2 weeks, and where necessary, it may be replaced by a documentary hearing

4. International Arbitration | Awards and Enforcement

International arbitration awards and enforcement

An award rendered through international arbitration has the same effect as a court judgment.

Once the written award is sent in writing, the parties must perform the award without delay.

It should be noted that international arbitration is, in principle, a single-instance system in which appeal is not possible.

Enforcement of Arbitral Awards

Grounds for Setting Aside an Arbitral Award

However, an objection to an arbitral award can be pursued by filing an action with a court to set aside the arbitral award.

The criteria for judgment are whether procedural legitimacy and legality and public order have been impaired.

A party seeking to set aside an arbitral award may file within 3 months from the date of receiving an authenticated copy of the arbitral award, and after the court’s recognition and enforcement decision has become final, even filing an action to set it aside is prohibited.

A court may set aside an arbitral award when the following grounds exist.

  • The arbitration agreement is invalid or was concluded by a person without capacity
  • The respondent did not receive proper notice of the arbitral proceedings or was deprived of the opportunity to defend
  • The content of the award goes beyond the scope of the arbitration agreement
  • The composition of the arbitrators or the procedure violates the parties’ agreement or the law of the relevant country
  • The award has not yet become final, or has been set aside or suspended
  • The nature of the dispute is a matter that cannot be resolved by arbitration under local law, or enforcement is contrary to public order

5. International Arbitration | Pre-Arbitration Checklist for Companies

Checklist Item

Considerations Before International Arbitration

1. Suitability of the dispute for arbitration

-Whether there is an arbitration clause in the contract

-Suitability for arbitration by nature (criminal and urgent provisional injunction matters are not suitable)

2. Whether other means such as negotiation or mediation have been attempted in addition to arbitration

Assessment of whether time and cost savings are possible

3. Whether contractual preliminary procedures (such as consultation) have been performed

A claim may be dismissed if the conditions for commencing arbitration are not met

4. Securing sufficient evidence and documents

Likelihood of supporting evidence such as contracts, notices, emails, and work logs

5. Reasonableness of the expected return relative to cost

Proceeding with arbitration after including attorney fees, arbitrator and institutional costs, expert fees, and similar expenses

6. The other party's ability to pay

Review of whether asset tracing is necessary

7. Enforceability of the award in the country where the other party's assets are located

Review of whether the country is a party to the New York Convention, the public policy exception, and similar matters

8. Whether the statute of limitations or the claim period has expired

Attention to the limitation periods of each country

9. Consideration of political and economic circumstances

Consideration of risks such as elections, exchange rates, and sanctions

10. Consultation with an expert specializing in arbitration

-Attorneys in general litigation and attorneys specializing in arbitration perform their work in different ways

-Room for negotiation, whether to strategically delay, and similar strategies can be formulated

International arbitration is not merely an alternative to litigation but a safeguard that should be strategically designed from the contract conclusion stage.

The presence of an arbitration clause, the clarity of its content, the choice of the seat of arbitration, and even the language and institution can all affect gains or losses ranging from hundreds of millions to tens of billions of won.

Depending on the prior formulation of strategy, document management, and use of arbitral institutions, international arbitration provides enforceability for the protection of a company's rights.

It is advisable to consult an attorney who understands the governing law of each country and has experience with international arbitration cases, and to begin by obtaining an assessment of the practical merits of international arbitration.

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney MoonKyoo JANG

MoonKyoo JANG

T. 070-7510-2139

Advised numerous German member companies of the Korean-German Chamber of Commerce and Industry

Attorney InTae BANG

InTae BANG

T. 070-7510-1822

International transaction lawyer

Mia KIM

Mia KIM

T. 070-7510-1044

Qualified as a general/foreign language translation administrator and licensed as a lawyer in Washington D.C.

Related Practice Areas

View more
View our Case Handling System

Consult in other languages

Popular Columns

View more
Quick Menu

Chat