Unpaid Receivables Lawyer | Full Grant of the Claim in a Settlement Amount Lawsuit With the Assistance of an Unpaid Receivables Lawyer

The unpaid receivables lawyer first reviewed the relevant legal principles and the facts.

Article 543 of the Civil Act, where a condition allowing termination is specified in the contract or the termination requirements prescribed by law are satisfied, termination of the contract is possible.

1) Clear Proof of the Client's Performance of the Contract

In cooperation with the internal digital forensics center, the lawyer collected the messages, email records, work logs, and shipping records exchanged between the client and the defendant.

Through the collected records, the lawyer proved that the work process matched exactly by comparing the shipping records with messages the client had sent, such as "Upon verification, the goods were properly shipped on the 00th at 00:00" and "The processing result can be confirmed in the system."

Through this, the lawyer strongly argued that the client had clearly performed the contractual obligations.

2) Argument That the Right to Claim Return of the Settlement Amount Had Arisen

Analyzing the defendant's transaction records together with the internal evidence investigation center, the lawyer discovered that the defendant's side had given notice of intent to enter into a contract with a new company about 2 months after entering into the contract with the client.

Through this, the lawyer asserted that the reason the defendant's side had engaged in so-called abusive conduct and claimed nonperformance by the client was to break the contract in question and enter into a contract with a new company.

The unpaid receivables lawyer accordingly specified the contractual clause stating that "the contract may be terminated where one intentionally damages the other party's reputation or causes harm," and emphasized that the client's legal right to claim the settlement amount had arisen.

As a result of the unpaid receivables lawyer's assistance, the court acknowledged that the defendant had intentionally defamed the client in order to break the contract, and that the client had faithfully performed the contractual obligations.

Accordingly, pursuant to Article 543 of the Civil Act, the court ruled that the defendant must pay the client the full amount of the unpaid settlement amount.

the party claiming the settlement amount (the plaintiff) must prove that it has performed its contractual obligations, it is important to secure objective materials and respond from the early stage.