[Jeonse Deposit Return Lawsuit] If You Wish to Pursue a Jeonse Deposit Return Lawsuit, Daeryun Law Firm

The client, who was preparing a jeonse deposit return lawsuit, had a dispute with the lessor over the jeonse deposit.

Even though the jeonse contract period had expired, a situation had arisen in which the client could not recover the jeonse deposit.

As the number of lessees unable to recover their jeonse deposits has recently increased, the client's anxiety grew,

and the client understood that the lessor was currently involved in another lawsuit over a housing matter.

With the possibility of not recovering the jeonse deposit increasing, the client came to Daeryun Law Firm to receive a consultation about a jeonse deposit return lawsuit.

The laws relevant to a jeonse deposit return lawsuit are set out in the Civil Act and the Housing Lease Protection Act.

Where a lessee does not have the deposit returned after the lease terminates, the lessee obtains the authority to apply for an order of registration of the lease right,

and once the registration of the lease right is completed pursuant to the order of registration of the lease, the lessee can acquire or maintain the opposing power and the right to preferential reimbursement.

Various methods are available to the client against the lessor before a jeonse deposit return lawsuit.

■ Application for an order of registration of the lease right

■ Sending the lessor certified mail stating the demand for return of the jeonse deposit

■ Application for a payment order for the jeonse deposit

→ All of these may be attempted.

If the dispute over conflicting interests with the other party intensifies, we recommend bringing a jeonse deposit return lawsuit right away.

By filing the complaint for the jeonse deposit return lawsuit, the team demanded that the lessor return the jeonse deposit.

Daeryun Law Firm's civil litigation team organized the contents of the complaint in a coherent manner based on the materials received from the client.

In the answer filed during the jeonse deposit return lawsuit, the other party stated that his building was currently in litigation,

and pleaded that it was at risk of being subjected to a provisional attachment.

He pleaded his financial difficulties and similar circumstances,

and in response, Daeryun Law Firm's civil litigation team countered that asserting one's own litigation circumstances did not affect the client, who was a good-faith third party.

As a result of the above pleadings and rebuttals in the jeonse deposit return lawsuit,

Daeryun Law Firm's civil litigation team succeeded in obtaining a judgment of complete victory from the court, sent the judgment to the client,

and held a second meeting to help with the execution procedures, providing the documents needed for execution.