Deals & Cases

Commencement of adult guardianship
Commencement of adult guardianshipDecision

Family Case | A Case Leading to a Decision to Commence Adult Guardianship Despite a Recommendation of Limited Guardianship

This is a case in which a client who visited the firm to resolve a family case, despite the court's recommendation to change to limited guardianship, ultimately obtained a decision to commence adult guardianship with the assistance of a family law attorney.

1. The Client Who Held a Family Case Consultation

The client who held a family case consultation was in a situation in which, while residing abroad, he confirmed the worsening of his father's dementia and indications of harm to his father's property, and he requested a consultation in order to put in place prompt legal protective measures.

How the Decision Was Made to Consider Applying for Commencement of Adult Guardianship

The client who visited a family law attorney to apply for commencement of adult guardianship had been residing abroad when he heard that the dementia symptoms of his father, who had been living alone, had rapidly worsened, and he urgently returned to the country.

Upon confirmation after returning, the client learned that there were indications that the caregiver hired to look after his father had exploited his father's diminished cognitive capacity to misappropriate money for private purposes.

Accordingly, the client concluded that legal measures were urgently needed to prevent further harm to his father's property and personal interests and to block the caregiver's improper access.

Ultimately, in order to apply for commencement of adult guardianship as an institutional safeguard to protect his father, the client visited a family law attorney to seek a consultation regarding the family case.

Details of the Family Case Work Example on Commencement of Adult Guardianship

2. Response Strategy for the Family Case and Scope of Assistance

While the procedure for commencement of adult guardianship in the family case was underway, the court issued a correction order directing that the purport of the claim be changed to limited guardianship, on the ground that the father's K-MMSE score was relatively high.

The family law attorney, however, noting that the father's cognitive function was rapidly declining, pursued the following strategy in this family case.

What Is the K-MMSE?

The K-MMSE is the ‘Korean Mini-Mental State Examination,’ a dementia screening tool that revises and supplements the existing MMSE to suit the linguistic and cultural characteristics of Koreans.

Argument of the Family Law Attorney ① | Proof of the Pattern of Change in Mental State

The family law attorney comprehensively analyzed the father's past medical records and the results of cognitive function tests conducted on several occasions.

Through this, the attorney emphasized that the father was not in a state of temporary decline but in a process of continuous deterioration of cognitive function due to progressive Alzheimer's disease.

In particular, the attorney confirmed that a recent additional examination had resulted in a diagnosis of moderate dementia, and organized, with objective materials, the fact that cognitive ability had progressively declined as compared with the earlier initial-stage assessment.

Accordingly, by submitting the relevant medical certificate and examination results as evidence, the family law attorney actively established that the client's father was in a state going beyond mild cognitive impairment and requiring continuous protection and legal management.

Argument of the Family Law Attorney ② | Request for an Expert Psychiatric Examination by the Court's Authority

In a situation where the court had recommended limited guardianship, the family law attorney requested that the court, by its authority, order an expert psychiatric examination in order to confirm that the client's father was currently in a state of continuously lacking the capacity to handle affairs.

In addition, the attorney guided the procedure so that the person concerned in the case could appear before the court in person and have his diminished capacity of judgment directly confirmed through an interview with the judge.

Argument of the Family Law Attorney ③ | Establishing the Risk of Harm to Property by a Third Party

The family law attorney organized and submitted as materials the records of the caregiver's repeated withdrawals of money from the father's account and the flow of funds whose use was unclear.

In addition, while establishing the circumstances indicating an attempt to register a marriage, the attorney made clear to the court that, should the caregiver acquire the status of a lawful spouse in the future, this could have a significant impact on the disposition of property or on the inheritance relationship.

The family law attorney emphasized that, although the client's father was capable of expressing his intentions in everyday matters, he was in a state in which it was difficult for him to independently judge important legal acts such as the disposition of property.

Accordingly, the attorney established, on the basis of concrete materials, that commencement of adult guardianship was necessary in order to institutionally block the intervention of a third party and to promote stable management of the property

3. Outcome of the Response to the Family Case: ‘Decision to Commence Adult Guardianship’

Outcome of the Response to the Family Case: Decision to Commence Adult Guardianship

In the early part of the adjudication on commencement of adult guardianship in the family case, the court recommended a change to limited guardianship on the basis of the cognitive function test results and other factors.

The family law attorney, however, continued to submit additional materials and to actively establish the case, arguing in concrete terms for the necessity of adult guardianship, and, after the procedures of an expert psychiatric examination by the court's authority and an examination of the person concerned, a decision to commence adult guardianship was ultimately rendered.

Differences Between Adult Guardianship and Limited Guardianship

In family cases, adult guardianship is a system that provides comprehensive protection where the capacity to handle affairs is continuously lacking, whereas limited guardianship is a system that provides limited support within a specific scope where capacity is partly deficient, and the two differ in this respect.

Category

Adult Guardianship

Limited Guardianship

Legal basis

Article 9 of the 「Civil Act」

Article 12 of the 「Civil Act」

Eligibility requirements

Where the capacity to handle affairs is continuously lacking due to illness, disability, old age, or the like

Where the capacity to handle affairs is deficient due to illness, disability, old age, or the like

Level of judgment capacity

A state in which overall decision-making capacity is almost absent or has been lost

A state in which some judgment capacity remains but there is difficulty in handling important affairs

Scope of guardianship

Comprehensive protection and representation as to property management and personal affairs as a whole

Protection and consent as to limited and specific affairs within the scope set by the court

Effect of the person's own acts

In principle, the guardian represents the person in legal acts

In principle the person acts for himself or herself, but the guardian's consent is required within the scope set by the court

When applicable

Where comprehensive protection is needed

Where partial and supplementary protection is needed

If You Need Assistance with a Family Case?

A family case is an area that directly affects all aspects of an individual's life, including family relationships, property, and personal protection, so careful review of the organization of the facts and of whether the legal requirements are met is important.

At the consultation stage, the family law attorney of Daeryun Law Firm closely ascertains the course of the case and the current situation, and then legally reviews whether the requirements for adult guardianship are met.

In addition, the attorney responds stage by stage to the procedures required in the course of the trial, such as responding to a correction order, submitting additional materials, and proceeding with the expert psychiatric examination procedure, and provides systematic assistance so that the court can fully determine the necessity.

If you need assistance with a family case in a situation such as the above, please request the help of a 🔗family law attorney who, after accurately diagnosing the characteristics of the matter and the current situation, will present a tailored response strategy.

가사사건

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Commencement of adult guardianship: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney IlSoo SHIN

IlSoo SHIN

T. 070-5117-2950

Experience as a judge in the Domestic Agreement Division of the Eastern Branch of the Busan District Court and as Chief Judge of the Seoul Central District Court

Attorney BoRa YANG

BoRa YANG

T. 070-7510-2139

Negotiated inheritance division and performed multiple judgments

Attorney SangUk OH

SangUk OH

T. 070-7510-2139

Inheritance lawyer

Attorney SungAh KIM

SungAh KIM

T. 070-5214-2362

Inheritance lawyer

Attorney MoonYong Lee

MoonYong Lee

T. 070-5221-3616

Inheritance lawyer

Key Case Studies

View more

Related Practice Areas

View more
View our Case Handling System

Consult in other languages

Popular Columns

View more

Previous

Application for Attachment of a Claim and a Collection Order | Attachment of and Collection from a Deposit Claim in a Case of an Unreturned Lease Deposit Granted

Next

Criminal Deposit | Using the Criminal Deposit System to Obtain a Minor Fine in an Indecent Act by Compulsion Case Facing the Risk of an Actual Sentence

View list
Quick Menu

Chat