Deals & Cases

Possession of sexual exploitation material, etc.
Possession of sexual exploitation material, etc.Non-referral

Non-referral in a Sex Crime Case | Sex Crime Attorney Who Assisted a University Student and Secured a Non-referral Decision on a Charge of Violating the Act on the Protection of Children and Youth against Sexual Abuse

In this non-referral case, the client learned that an account created through identity theft had been used in connection with a sex crime.

With the assistance of a specialist attorney, the client was able to obtain a non-referral decision.

1. Non-referral in a Sex Crime Case | The Course of Events in Which a University Student Client Became Implicated in a Crime

non-referral violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Youth against Sexual Abuse child sexual exploitation material possession of sexual exploitation material punishment under the Act on the Protection of Children and Youth against Sexual Abuse


The client who requested a consultation in order to obtain a non-referral decision was a university student in his early twenties enrolled at a university in the Seoul metropolitan area.

The client frequently used online communities and secondhand trading platforms, and one day received a request from the police to appear in connection with an account held in the client's name.

The investigative agency explained that possession of child and youth sexual exploitation material had been confirmed in an online account opened in the client's name.

The account at issue, however, was not one that the client had personally used, and the client had not even been aware of the existence of that account.

Yet from the investigative agency's standpoint, once the account holder had been confirmed to be the client, it had no choice but to examine the client's connection to the case.

The client was preparing for employment, with graduation approaching.

Accordingly, the client felt a great burden at the prospect that a criminal record for a sex crime might place him at a disadvantage in his future career.

The sex crime attorney therefore assisted the client and, focusing on the circumstances under which the account had been opened, the actual access records, and whether any device had been used, concentrated on securing materials that could distinguish the account holder from the actual user, and devised a strategy aimed at a non-referral decision.

2. Non-referral in a Sex Crime Case | The Sex Crime Attorney's Actual Response Strategy

In order to obtain a non-referral decision, the sex crime attorney organized in detail, through consultation, the times of access to the account at issue, the devices used, and the client's daily movements.

The attorney then systematically organized the points that the investigative agency needed to confirm and devised a strategy aimed at a non-referral decision.

Analyzing the Digital Access Records

The sex crime attorney confirmed, through an analysis of the digital materials, the environment in which the account at issue had actually been used.

In this process, after confirming the matter in cooperation with the 🔗Digital Forensics Center, the attorney was able to establish that the access IP of the account at issue differed considerably from the client's place of residence and area of daily life.

In addition, no traces of downloading or storing the material at issue were found on the client's mobile phone or personal laptop.

sex crime attorney submitted a written opinion organizing the above facts and intensively demonstrated that it was difficult to identify the actual user.

Arguing the Need to Distinguish the Account Holder from the Actual User

The investigative agency brought the charge against the client on the basis that the account was held in the client's name.

The sex crime attorney, however, intensively explained that the account holder and the actual user could not be regarded as one and the same.

In particular, the attorney emphasized that crimes exploiting leaked personal information have recently been occurring in various forms, and that cases of unauthorized use of another person's information in the course of signing up for online platforms are also frequent.

The sex crime attorney also pointed out that there was no direct material establishing that the client had viewed or stored the video at issue, and argued that there was insufficient objective evidence to prove the charge.

Organizing the Direction of the Statement for the Police Investigation

Because the statement given during the police investigation is also an important factor in obtaining a non-referral decision, the sex crime attorney organized the anticipated questions in advance and reviewed the direction of the answers in concrete terms.

The attorney also accompanied the client to the investigation and provided direct assistance so that the client could clearly explain the facts during the questioning.

3. Non-referral in a Sex Crime Case | Result: A Non-referral Decision

The investigative agency comprehensively reviewed the fact that the IP access location did not match the client's actual area of daily life and the fact that no traces of the relevant files were found on the devices used.

As a result, it determined that there was insufficient material to conclude that the client had personally used the account at issue.

It was also taken into account that no direct evidence of downloading or viewing the file at issue had been confirmed.

In the end, the client's case was concluded with a non-referral decision, and the client was able to relieve the concern over criminal punishment and return to his studies and daily life.

4. Non-referral in a Sex Crime Case | Legal Information on Violations of the Act on the Protection of Children and Youth against Sexual Abuse

In the course of responding with a view to a non-referral decision, the procedure of accurately confirming the substance of the charge is important.

In particular, because the Act on the Protection of Children and Youth against Sexual Abuse provides for strict punishment of digital sex crimes, having a clear understanding of the relevant law is key.

Summary of the Main Sentencing Levels

Offense

Criminal Punishment

Production, import, or export of child and youth sexual exploitation material

Life imprisonment or imprisonment for not less than five years

Distribution, provision, advertisement, introduction, exhibition, or screening for profit, and possession or transport for such purposes

Imprisonment for a definite term of not less than five years

Distribution, provision, advertisement, introduction, exhibition, or screening

Imprisonment for a definite term of not less than three years

Arranging production

Threats using child and youth sexual exploitation material

Purchasing, possessing, or viewing child and youth sexual exploitation material

Imprisonment for a definite term of not less than one year


Crimes using digital storage media or online accounts may lead, in addition to criminal punishment, to further disadvantages such as registration of personal information and employment restrictions, so setting the approach to the response at the early stage of the investigation is very important.

Points to Confirm at the Initial Response Stage

The course of a non-referral case can change depending on whether digital materials are secured.

Therefore, rather than offering forced explanations or giving statements emotionally at the early stage of a case, it is important to objectively organize the access records and the device usage history and to set the approach to the response.

If, like the client in this case, the key issue is whether the actual user can be identified, we encourage you to respond by systematically reviewing the relevant materials through a 🔗legal consultation appointment.

Daeryun, Korea's ninth-largest law firm (based on 2025 value-added tax filings with the National Tax Service), helps resolve cases through the systematic strategies of legal specialists across multiple practice areas.

• Reviewing the direction of the statement and the response strategy from the early investigation stage

• Organizing the facts through digital forensics and analysis of evidentiary materials

• Accompanying the client through the police investigation and trial proceedings to support the procedural response

• Comprehensively reviewing the course of the case and the evidentiary relationships to build a defense argument

성범죄불송치 | 아청법위반 혐의 대학생 조력해 불송치 이끈 성범죄변호사

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Possession of sexual exploitation material, etc.: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney InWon KIM

InWon KIM

T. 070-7510-1044

Experience as Chief Prosecutor of Seoul Central District Prosecutors’ Office and Chief Prosecutor of Daejeon Hongseong Branch

Attorney JaeBong JEONG

JaeBong JEONG

T. 070-7510-1820

Experience as chief prosecutor at Uijeongbu District Prosecutors’ Office and chief prosecutor at Busan District Prosecutors’ Office

Attorney Sung Dong PARK

Sung Dong PARK

T. 070-7510-2018

Experience as a senior prosecutor at the Seoul High Prosecutors' Office and a police officer at the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency

Attorney SungKook HEO

SungKook HEO

T. 070-5221-2805

Sex crime lawyer

Attorney MyoungChul KIM

MyoungChul KIM

T. 070-7510-1118

Sex crime lawyer

Key Case Studies

View more

Related Practice Areas

View more
View our Case Handling System

Consult in other languages

Popular Columns

View more

Previous

Case of Assistance with a Violation of the Act on Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes | Non-referral for a Client Charged with a Violation of the Act on Aggravated Punishment of Specific Crimes and Multiple Criminal Charges

Next

Fee for Retaining a Fraud Attorney | The Attorney Who Helped a Client Charged with Fraud and the Like Obtain an Acquittal

View list
Quick Menu

Chat