Daejeon Fraud Attorney | Daejeon Fraud Attorney Who Successfully Defended a Fraud Lawsuit and Concluded the Case with a Suspended Sentence

The client who came to the Daejeon fraud attorney had agreed to take over a fruit store on the introduction of an acquaintance.

The client requested that the rights to the store be transferred first, before paying the transfer price, and promised to pay the transfer price with help from family members and a business loan.

However, the client was in a situation in which financial support from family could not be obtained, and the client even had substantial personal debts.

Although the rights had been transferred, the fruit store owner came to charge the client with fraud because the client was not paying the transfer price.

The client therefore came to Daeryun's Daejeon fraud attorney for the defense in the fraud lawsuit.

■ Relevant Statutes Explained by the Daejeon Fraud Attorney

◎ Criminal Act

▶ Article 347 (Fraud)

(1) A person who obtains the delivery of property or acquires a pecuniary advantage by deceiving another shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 10 years or by a fine not exceeding 20 million won.

(2) The same penalty as in the preceding paragraph shall apply where a person causes a third party to obtain the delivery of property or to acquire a pecuniary advantage by the method described in the preceding paragraph.

The Daejeon fraud attorney emphasized that the client was a first-time offender with no record of punishment for crimes of the same type or any other type.

Through the investigation and trial in this case, the client keenly realized how serious a wrong had been committed and resolved never to harm another person again.

Daeryun's Daejeon fraud attorney pleaded that the client was a healthy member of society who had lived life diligently.

The Daejeon fraud attorney argued that there was almost no possibility that the client would commit fraud again.

The client had been working diligently as a fixed-term employee at a small or medium-sized enterprise for several months and was doing his best for an upcoming evaluation for conversion to a permanent position.

Daeryun's Daejeon fraud attorney pleaded that the client was striving for conversion to a permanent position and that the likelihood of the foolish act of committing a crime again was markedly low.

The Daejeon fraud attorney argued that the victim did not want the client to be punished and that an amicable settlement had been reached.

The client sincerely apologized and sought forgiveness, delivering the amount of settlement money the victim wanted.

The victim accepted the client's apology and even prepared a settlement agreement stating that the victim did not want the client to be punished.

Daeryun's Daejeon fraud attorney submitted the settlement agreement containing the above as supporting material.

The client who came to the Daejeon fraud attorney was in a situation requiring a defense in a fraud lawsuit, and visited Daeryun to obtain the assistance of a Daejeon attorney.

Daeryun's Daejeon fraud attorney accordingly formed a team of Daejeon attorneys with extensive experience in fraud litigation, and assisted with the overall procedure of the lawsuit while conducting detailed consultation with the client.

As a result, the court accepted the Daejeon fraud attorney's arguments and pronounced a suspended sentence for the client.

If you are facing concerns over a fraud lawsuit like the case above, you may wish to consult with the Daejeon fraud attorney at Daeryun Law Firm.