Deals & Cases

Special (aggravated) intimidation
Special (aggravated) intimidationNon-referral (police)

Intimidation Complaint | A Case That Resulted in a Non-Referral Despite the Risk of a Fine for Intimidation After Being Reported for a Threatening Text Message

The client, who received an intimidation complaint, was in a situation where he faced charges after sending a threatening text message during a conflict.

The criminal attorney secured a non-referral (police) decision, defending against the risk of a fine for intimidation.

1. Intimidation Complaint | How the Repeat Exam-Candidate Client Came to Be Investigated

The client who received an intimidation complaint was a repeat college entrance exam candidate in his twenties.

The client had maintained a friendship with fellow students with whom he studied at a comprehensive exam-preparation academy, and he came to hear that one of these friends had not been repaid money he had lent to another student.

The friend lamented his frustration, saying that he had requested repayment several times but the other party was avoiding contact.

The client, having heard this, contacted the other party on the friend's behalf.

In the course of demanding repayment of the debt by text message, the client used expressions such as “if you keep avoiding me, I will come find you in person” and “I will not let this pass.”

Afterward, the other party who received these messages claimed to have felt threatened and submitted an intimidation complaint, and the client, charged with intimidation, became a suspect in a criminal case and underwent a police investigation.

In a situation where he was preparing to retake the college entrance exam, the client, feeling anxious that he might receive a fine for intimidation and be left with a record of criminal punishment, requested the assistance of a criminal attorney.

2. Intimidation Complaint | The Main Issues the Criminal Attorney Reviewed

intimidation complaint fine for intimidation requirements for the establishment of intimidation criminal litigation criminal case procedure


The criminal attorney who reviewed the intimidation complaint case conducted a consultation with the client.

Then, the attorney established a strategy for responding to the fine for intimidation, centered on whether intimidation was actually established and on the context before and after the messages.

Strategy for Responding to the Police Investigation

The criminal attorney conducted interviews with the client, who had received the intimidation complaint, on several occasions, organizing in detail the circumstances of the text message's sending and the situation at the time.

In particular, the attorney systematically organized the process by which the client came to make contact at the friend's request, the relationship with the other party, and the actual content of the conversation, so that unnecessary misunderstandings would not arise during the investigation.

In addition, the criminal attorney advised on the matters to be stated during the police investigation and the points requiring caution, examining in advance the direction of response to the investigation and to the fine for intimidation.

Rebuttal of the Requirements for the Establishment of Intimidation

Supreme Court Decision 2022Do9187, decided December 15, 2022

For intimidation to be established, the content of the harm announced must, when comprehensively considered in light of the various circumstances before and after the act, such as the dispositions of the actor and the victim, the surrounding circumstances at the time of the announcement, and the degree of familiarity and status and other mutual relationship between the actor and the victim, be sufficient to generally cause a person to feel fear.


The most important issue in the intimidation complaint case was whether the messages in question amounted to an announcement of harm sufficient to cause fear in an ordinary person.

The criminal attorney, in collaboration with the 🔗Digital Forensics Center, secured the entire conversation history between the client and the other party and analyzed the context of the statements.

The review confirmed that, even immediately after receiving the text messages, the other party continued an ordinary conversation with the client and even used expressions mixed with jokes.

In addition, the client had not in fact taken any action to inflict harm on the other party.

The criminal attorney emphasized that, in light of the criteria for the establishment of intimidation required by Supreme Court precedent, it was difficult to regard the messages in question as an announcement of harm to the degree of objectively causing fear.

Statement of Opinion and Demonstration of Mitigating Circumstances

The criminal attorney explained that the client had merely contacted the other party on a one-time basis at the request of a friend who asked him to help resolve a money problem, and that he had no intention of actually inflicting harm on the other party.

The attorney also actively argued the need for leniency, emphasizing that the client was a first-time offender with no record of criminal punishment and was an exam candidate diligently engaged in study in order to enter university.

3. Criminal Threat Complaint | Result with Criminal Attorney Assistance, Non-referral

The investigative authority reviewing the criminal threat complaint comprehensively examined the submitted statement of opinion and the message records.

As a result, it determined that the content of the client's text messages alone made it difficult to find that intimidation was established, and that the actual intent to harm or the degree to which fear was induced was not sufficiently recognized.

Accordingly, as the intimidation charge was not recognized against the client, a decision of non-referral was issued.

From the early stage of the investigation after receiving the criminal threat complaint, the client organized the facts and systematically examined the legal issues, and as a result was able to resolve the risk of criminal punishment such as a fine for intimidation.

4. Criminal Threat Complaint | Legal Information to Be Aware Of

If you have received a criminal threat complaint, in addition to the content of the text messages, it is necessary to comprehensively examine the context of the statements, the relationship with the other party, and the circumstances before and after the incident.

In other words, it is important to examine the overall context of the conversation at issue and the legal elements of the offense.

Requirements for Establishing Intimidation and the Level of Punishment

For intimidation to be established, a harm must be communicated to the other party, and its content must be such as to objectively induce fear.

These requirements for establishing a criminal threat complaint can be briefly summarized as follows.

Category

Content

Communication of harm

Notifying the other party of content that would inflict harm

Possibility of inducing fear

Must be to a degree that an ordinary person would feel threatened

Intent

There must be an intention to communicate the harm


If such an intimidation charge is established, under Article 283, Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Act, the offense is punishable by imprisonment of up to 3 years or a fine of up to 5 million won.

Why Criminal Attorney Assistance Is Needed

A criminal threat complaint case is not determined by only one or two text messages; the examination of the overall context of the conversation and the legal elements of the offense is important.

A criminal attorney systematically explains the client's position through analysis of message records, organization of the facts, preparation of statements of opinion, and response to police questioning.

In particular, when securing evidentiary materials is necessary, objective materials are reviewed and a response strategy is established through collaboration with the Evidence Investigation Center and the Digital Forensics Center.

If you are in a situation where an investigation has begun after receiving a criminal threat complaint, the facts and legal issues can be examined from the early stage of the case through the 🔗legal consultation page.

Daeryun, the ninth-largest law firm in Korea (based on 2025 National Tax Service value-added tax filings), assists with responding to a fine for intimidation through the systematic strategy of legal professionals across multiple fields.

 협박죄고소장 | 협박문자로 고소, 협박죄벌금 위기에서 불송치 이끈 사례

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Special (aggravated) intimidation: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney YoungKon CHO

YoungKon CHO

T. 070-7510-2014

Experience as Chief of Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office and Chief of Daegu District Prosecutors' Office

Attorney SangSu JO

SangSu JO

T. 070-5117-3709

Experience as Chief Prosecutor of the 5th Criminal Division of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office and Deputy Chief Prosecutor of the Suncheon Branch of the Gwangju Prosecutors' Office

Attorney IlSoo SHIN

IlSoo SHIN

T. 070-5117-2950

Experience as Chief Judge of Seoul Central District Court and Chief Judge of Ansan Branch of Suwon District Court

Attorney Sung Dong PARK

Sung Dong PARK

T. 070-7510-2018

Experience as a senior prosecutor at the Seoul High Prosecutors' Office and a police officer at the Seoul Metropolitan Police Agency

Attorney MinSoo SHIN

MinSoo SHIN

T. 070-7510-1118

Experience as Chief Judge of Ulsan District Court and Judge of Incheon District Court

Attorney BongHa SEO

BongHa SEO

T. 070-7510-1755

Experience as chief prosecutor at Uijeongbu District Prosecutors’ Office and chief prosecutor at Busan West Branch

Key Case Studies

View more

Related Practice Areas

View more
View our Case Handling System

Consult in other languages

Popular Columns

View more

Related Case Analysis / Legal Updates

View more

Previous

Corporate Rehabilitation Proceedings | Corporate Rehabilitation Attorney Assists a Medical Device Distribution Company, Leading to a Decision Approving Simplified Rehabilitation

Next

Advisory Case on the Guardianship System | Decision to Commence Limited Guardianship for an Adult Child With an Intellectual Disability

View list
Quick Menu

Chat