Daegu Fraud Attorney | Daegu Fraud Attorney Assists the Client and Obtains a Suspended Sentence for the Fraud Defendant

The client who sought the Daegu fraud attorney was an employee who had worked part-time at the victim's restaurant.

The client told the victim that, if the victim first transferred the rights to the restaurant's premises, the client would pay the transfer price later.

The client said that part of the transfer price would be provided by the client's family, part would come from money loaned to acquaintances being repaid, part would be provided by the family, and the remainder would be raised by obtaining a business loan related to operating the premises.

In reality, however, the Daegu fraud attorney's client had personal debts borrowed from banks and others at the time, the client's financial situation was poor and the client's credit was deteriorating, there was no money to be repaid by acquaintances or money raised by the defendant's family in connection with acquiring the premises, and even if the client obtained a loan related to operating the premises, the client intended to use it not for the transfer price but for repaying existing debts, operating funds, and living expenses, so the client had neither the intention nor the ability to pay the transfer price to the victim.

The Daegu fraud attorney's client was charged on the basis that the client deceived the victim as described above, took over the premises from the deceived victim, and yet acquired pecuniary benefit by not paying the transfer price.

The Daegu fraud attorney's client never said that the client would repay loans made to acquaintances in order to pay the transfer price, but rather said that the client would raise the transfer price for the shop in this case with the help of the client's parents and through a loan, and the victim, while well aware that (1) the client's parents opposed the acquisition of the shop in this case and (2) the client was covering living expenses by drawing salary advances, among other circumstances, accepted the client's proposal to pay the transfer price through a loan and then entered into the transfer agreement for the shop in this case with the client.

Taking these circumstances together, the defendant denies the facts charged in this case in their entirety, on the grounds that the defendant did not deceive the complainant with respect to repayment ability and had no intent to defraud.

The Daegu fraud attorney denied the facts charged against the client and presented the following defense.

The Daegu fraud attorney demonstrated that the client had no intent to commit fraud and, citing the evidence, showed that there had been no deception, thereby obtaining a suspended sentence.

Fraud is a serious crime that may be punishable by imprisonment for not more than 10 years or a fine of not more than 20 million won, and it can be difficult to avoid an actual term of imprisonment.

If you are in an unfair situation like the client's, you may consult the Daegu fraud attorney about your case.