Deals & Cases

Illegal filming using a camera
Illegal filming using a cameraType 1 and Type 2 protective dispositions

[Daegu School Violence Attorney Assistance Case] With the Assistance of a Daegu School Violence Attorney, the Juvenile Trial Concluded With Type 1 and Type 2 Protective Dispositions

The client who came to the Daegu school violence attorney was a middle school student facing a juvenile trial on a sex crime charge, and with the assistance of the Daegu school violence attorney, the juvenile trial resulted in Type 1 and Type 2 protective dispositions.

1. The Client Who Came to the Daegu School Violence Attorney

The client who came to the Daegu school violence attorney was a middle school student facing a juvenile trial on a sex crime charge, and he sought to defend against the trial with the assistance of a Daeryun Daegu school violence attorney.

The Circumstances of the Case as Determined by the Daegu School Violence Attorney

The client who came to the Daegu school violence attorney was a male middle school student facing a juvenile trial for having committed sex crimes.

The client had, without consent, used his cell phone camera to photograph the underwear and thigh area visible beneath the school uniform skirt of a female student at the same school, and he had saved the photographs.

In addition, the client had secretly used his own cell phone camera to photograph and keep nude images of a classmate's girlfriend that the classmate had stored on his phone with the girlfriend's consent.

Facing a juvenile trial for the offenses described above, the client came to the Daeryun Daegu school violence attorney in order to obtain a lighter protective disposition.

Case-Related Statutes Explained by the Daegu School Violence Attorney

■ Case-Related Statutes Explained by the Daegu School Violence Attorney

◎ Juvenile Act

▶ Article 1 (Purpose)

The purpose of this Act is to help juveniles grow soundly by taking necessary measures, such as protective dispositions for adjusting the environment and correcting the conduct of antisocial juveniles, and by taking special measures concerning criminal disposition.


▶ Article 2 (Juveniles and Guardians)

In this Act, a “juvenile” means a person under 19 years of age, and a “guardian” means a person who has a legal duty to provide custodial education or a person who currently has custody.

▶ Article 32 (Decision on Protective Dispositions)

① If, as a result of the hearing, a juvenile court judge finds it necessary to impose a protective disposition, the judge shall, by decision, impose one of the dispositions falling under any of the following subparagraphs:

1. Entrustment of custody to a guardian or a person who can protect the juvenile in place of a guardian

2. An order to attend lectures

3. A community service order

4. Short-term probation by a probation officer

5. Long-term probation by a probation officer

6. Entrustment of custody to a child welfare facility under the Child Welfare Act or another juvenile protection facility

7. Entrustment to a hospital, a sanatorium, or a medical rehabilitation juvenile reformatory under the Act on the Treatment of Protected Juveniles and Others

8. Referral to a juvenile reformatory for up to 1 month

9. Short-term referral to a juvenile reformatory

10. Long-term referral to a juvenile reformatory

2. The Daegu School Violence Attorney's Assistance in Defending the Trial

To defend the client's juvenile trial, the Daegu school violence attorney assembled a working team of Daegu attorneys with extensive experience in school violence cases and assisted with the overall proceedings.

Daegu School Violence Attorney Argued That the Client Did Not Distribute the Filmed Material

The Daegu school violence attorney argued that the client did not distribute the filmed material and had no intention of doing so whatsoever.

The client committed the offenses in this case out of a momentary, misguided curiosity, but he deleted all of the filmed material and had never distributed it externally.

The attorney also emphasized that the client had never committed any other delinquent acts or received any criminal punishment.

The Daeryun Daegu school violence attorney urged that the client was sincerely remorseful, that he was humbly accepting the criticism of his schoolmates, and that he was seeking forgiveness for his wrongdoing.

Daegu School Violence Attorney Argued That an Amicable Settlement Had Been Reached With the Victims

The Daegu school violence attorney argued that the client had personally visited each of the victims to seek forgiveness and had reached an amicable settlement with them.

The client deeply repented of his offenses, visited the victims, knelt down, and apologized, and the victims forgave the client and prepared statements expressing that they did not wish to see him punished.

Even after the settlement, the client continued to make efforts toward each victim's recovery.

The Daeryun Daegu school violence attorney submitted the victims' statements declining to seek punishment as evidence and urged leniency for the client.

3. Daegu School Violence Attorney Concluded the Case With Type 1 and Type 2 Protective Dispositions

The Daegu school violence attorney assembled a working team to defend the client's juvenile trial and provided assistance to the fullest, and the trial concluded with Type 1 and Type 2 protective dispositions.

Juvenile Trial Defense Succeeded With the Assistance of the Daegu School Violence Attorney

The client who came to the Daegu school violence attorney was a middle school student who had committed sex crimes, and he sought the assistance of a Daegu school violence attorney to defend his juvenile trial.

In response, the Daeryun Daegu school violence attorney assembled a working team of Daegu attorneys with extensive experience in juvenile trials and assisted to the fullest.

As a result of the trial, the court imposed Type 1 and Type 2 protective dispositions on the client, namely entrustment of custody to a guardian and an order to attend a sexual violence treatment course.

If you are facing concerns in a situation similar to the client's above, you may consult with a Daeryun Law Firm Daegu school violence attorney.

[대구학폭변호사 조력사례] 대구학폭변호사의 조력으로 소년재판 1·2호 보호처분으로 종결

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Illegal filming using a camera: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Previous

Busan Defamation Attorney | With a Defamation Attorney's Assistance, a Non-Referral Decision Was Reached on a Defamation Charge

Next

Seosan Civil Litigation Attorney Defendant Assistance | Civil Litigation Attorney Defends Against a Payment of 250 Million Won by Having the Plaintiff's Claim for Return of a Deposit Dismissed

View list
Quick Menu

Chat