Deals & Cases

Damages (Intellectual Property)
Damages (Intellectual Property)Successful Mediation

Entertainer Attorney Litigation Case | An Entertainer Attorney Concludes a Right of Publicity Lawsuit Through Successful Mediation

The client had been served with a right of publicity lawsuit, and through the assistance of a Daeryun entertainer attorney with extensive case experience, was able to conclude the case through successful mediation.

1. The Client's Situation

The client had been served with a right of publicity lawsuit by a currently active YouTuber, and needed the assistance of a Daeryun entertainer attorney to defend the case.

The Entertainer Attorney Holds a Consultation to Accurately Understand the Case

The entertainer attorney held a consultation to accurately understand the case of the client who visited Daeryun.

The client was the head of a company running a beauty brand, and a well-known YouTuber who had served as a model for the client's brand had filed a lawsuit against the client, claiming that the YouTuber's right of publicity had been infringed.

Two years earlier, right after launching the brand, the client had concluded an advertising model contract with the well-known YouTuber, Mr. B, to promote the products.

Even after the contract ended, the company continued to sell promotional brochures featuring Mr. B's face, and photographs of the well-known YouTuber continued to be used on the website posters.

For the reasons above, Mr. B's side filed a damages lawsuit against the client, claiming infringement of the right of publicity.

The client therefore came to a Daeryun entertainer attorney with extensive case experience to defend the lawsuit.

The Right of Publicity Explained by the Entertainer Attorney

■ The Right of Publicity Explained by the Entertainer Attorney

▶ What Is the Right of Publicity?

The "right of publicity" refers to the right to commercially use the likeness of a public figure, and means an economic right concerning a person's overall impression, including their character, name, and likeness.

In Korea, the right of publicity is not yet an established concept under the law, and the courts address even the property-related aspects of the issue through the right of personality.

In the United States, the right of publicity protects the likeness of a public figure not only from the standpoint of personal rights but also from the standpoint of property rights.

Recently in Korea as well, right of publicity lawsuits by public figures such as film actors, television personalities, singers, and athletes have become increasingly frequent.

Statutes Related to the Case Explained by the Entertainer Attorney

■ Statutes Related to the Case Explained by the Entertainer Attorney

Article 750 of the Civil Act (Contents of Tort)

A person who causes loss to another by an unlawful act, intentionally or negligently, shall be liable to compensate for such loss.

Article 1 of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act (Purpose)
The purpose of this Act is to maintain a sound order of trade by preventing acts of unfair competition, such as the wrongful use of another person's trademark or trade name widely known in Korea, and acts that infringe another person's trade secret.

Article 2 of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act (Definitions)

1. "Act of unfair competition" means an act falling under any of the following items.
An act that infringes another person's economic interests by using, without authorization and for one's own business, a mark capable of identifying another person, such as that person's name, likeness, voice, or signature, which is widely recognized in Korea and has economic value, in a manner contrary to fair commercial practices or competition order

2. The Entertainer Attorney's Assistance for the Lawsuit

The entertainer attorney carefully analyzed the case through continuous discussion and research, and assembled a team of entertainer attorneys with extensive experience in right of publicity lawsuits to assist with the overall proceedings.

The Entertainer Attorney's Assistance

The entertainer attorney made the following arguments in order to defend the damages lawsuit filed by YouTuber Mr. B, who claimed that his right of publicity had been infringed.

▶ Argument that the online advertising was carried out by another advertising company that had purchased the promotional brochures

▶ Argument that the promotional brochures containing YouTuber Mr. B's face were produced during the advertising contract period

▶ Argument that not deleting the poster from the website was not for the purpose of product advertising

Daeryun's entertainer attorney rebutted the arguments of YouTuber Mr. B's side, who had filed the right of publicity lawsuit, emphasizing that the brochures had been prepared during the advertising contract period and that uploading a poster to a website is a common practice.

3. The Entertainer Attorney Concludes the Case Through Successful Mediation

The entertainer attorney assembled a team to assist with the case in order to defend the damages lawsuit filed by YouTuber Mr. B, who claimed infringement of his right of publicity, and as a result was able to conclude the case through successful mediation.

Successful Mediation Through the Entertainer Attorney's Assistance

The entertainer attorney assisted with all stages of the lawsuit through continuous discussion and research into the case for the client, who needed to defend a right of publicity damages lawsuit.

As a result, the court accepted the arguments of the Daeryun entertainer attorney, and mediation was established under which only 7.5 million won of YouTuber Mr. B's original claim of 100 million won was to be paid.

The client was satisfied with the successful mediation and repeatedly expressed gratitude to the Daeryun entertainer attorney, who had done their best to resolve the case.

If, like the client above, you wish to defend a right of publicity lawsuit, we recommend consulting a Daeryun Law Firm entertainer attorney.

연예인변호사 소송사례 | 연예인변호사, 퍼블리시티권 소송 조정성립으로 마무리

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Damages (Intellectual Property): Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Previous

Jinju Law Firm Assistance | Assault Case Client, Securing a Fine Through Jinju Law Firm Assistance

Next

Busan Attorney Consultation Case | Successful Reduction of Sentence After a Busan Attorney Consultation in the Face of an Actual Prison Sentence

View list
Quick Menu

Chat