Namyangju Divorce Litigation Attorney | A Namyangju Attorney Who Filed a Lawsuit Against the Adulterous Partner and Recovered 20 Million Won

The defendant in the case of the Namyangju divorce litigation attorney made the following arguments.

The defendant acknowledged that she had developed a deeper relationship with the client's husband, but said that the period of their involvement was very short, about one month, and that she ended the relationship immediately after the client learned of the relationship between the defendant and the husband.

The defendant also said that, although she had drunk with the client's husband a few times, they had not drunk alone, and that the client had misunderstood gatherings held together with other trainers and members.

The fishing outing, too, was an occasion attended together with other trainers and members, so she had gone along without any hesitation, and she said that if the defendant and the client's husband had been in a special relationship, there would have been no reason to go together with other people.

As for staying at the hotel, she said that there was a business that she operated together with other trainers and members near the hotel, so she had merely parked there, and that the claim that she had stayed at the hotel together with him was a baseless conjecture.

On these grounds, the defendant argued that the amount of damages should be reduced, citing that the period of her involvement with the client's husband had been very short, that she had ended the relationship immediately once the client learned of it, that she had admitted from the outset that there had been a time when her relationship with the client's husband deepened, and that the client's husband had already paid a settlement sum.

In this Namyangju divorce litigation matter, the defendant clearly knew that the client and the client's husband were in a common-law marriage, yet she actively approached the client's husband and formed an improper relationship with him.

According to the statement of a fellow trainer who worked with the client's husband, the defendant did not return home even after lessons had ended and actively approached the client's husband.

The defendant even continued other unreasonable behavior, such as leaving notes that suggested she was the romantic partner of the client's husband, as if intending for the client to see them.

The Namyangju divorce litigation attorney's client suffered severe emotional harm because of the infidelity between the defendant and the client's husband.

For the client, the defendant's conduct, lacking any moral consideration despite the defendant also having a spouse, was a shocking matter that she could not comprehend.

In this Namyangju divorce litigation matter, the defendant argued that the damages should be reduced because the client had already received a settlement from her husband, but that money was nothing more than a division of marital property, which settled living expenses and similar matters.

Even if it had truly been a settlement, it pertained to the harm the husband caused the client, and it does not reduce the defendant's liability for damages.