Changwon School Violence Attorney Case | “No Measures” for a School Violence Matter Through a Changwon School Violence Attorney's Assistance

The client who requested assistance from a Changwon school violence attorney is a middle school student attending a school in Changwon.

On the day of the incident, the client played a game of dodgeball with classmates during physical education class.

During the dodgeball game, an accident reportedly occurred in which the alleged victim was hit by the ball and fell.

In response, the client pointed at the alleged victim with his hand and whispered that it would be a good idea to go to the nurse's office.

However, the alleged victim reported the client for school violence, claiming that the client had pointed at him accusingly and made sarcastic remarks.

Because the client was not on familiar terms with the alleged victim, he was quite taken aback upon hearing of the school violence report.

The client requested assistance from a Changwon school violence attorney at Daeryun Law Firm.

▶ Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against Violence in Schools, Article 1 (Purpose)

The purpose of this Act is to protect the human rights of students and to foster them as sound members of society by prescribing the matters necessary for the prevention of and countermeasures against school violence, thereby protecting victimized students, guiding and educating perpetrating students, and resolving disputes between victimized and perpetrating students.

▶ Act on the Prevention of and Countermeasures against Violence in Schools, Article 2 (Definitions)

The definitions of the terms used in this Act are as follows.

“School violence” means an act that causes physical, mental, or property damage to students, occurring inside or outside school and directed at students, by means of bodily injury, assault, confinement, intimidation, abduction or inducement, defamation or insult, extortion, coercion or compelled errands, sexual violence, bullying, cyberbullying, and the like.

▶ Seoul Administrative Court, 2014 Judgment

In light of the language of the purpose and definition provisions of the School Violence Act, school violence is not limited to the assault, defamation, insult, bullying, and other acts enumerated above, but is to be understood as including all acts similar or equivalent thereto that entail physical, mental, or property damage to students.

The client did not at all commit the act of school violence alleged by the complaining party.

The Changwon school violence attorney emphasized that, although the client had been unjustly reported for school violence, he had not made any criticism or reproach of the other student at all, but was rather a thoughtful student who considered and comforted the other student's position

The complaining party and the complaining party's parents made the school violence report on the basis of the complaining party's statements alone, without any objective evidence.

The attorney emphasized that, because it was unclear which part constituted school violence, if the alleged harm existed, the complaining party would have to submit objective evidence and materials.

The case above involved a client who was reported for school violence but obtained a “No Measures” decision with the assistance of a Changwon school violence attorney.

As this case shows, if you have been unjustly implicated in a school violence matter, it is advisable to receive the assistance of an experienced attorney.

Daeryun Law Firm's school violence group draws on years of case experience and data in the field of school violence to develop thorough advocacy strategies and to reach sound outcomes.

If you need to defend against a 🔗School Violence Committee disposition in a situation like the case above, you are welcome to request a consultation with a Changwon school violence attorney at Daeryun Law Firm at any time.