[Rape Attorney Success Case] Client Unfairly Accused of Rape, Acquittal

The client who came to the rape attorney was an ordinary office worker who had recently been hired and was attending work diligently.

He grew close to a female employee from another department at work, and they came to like each other, and as the relationship developed, they went on several dates.

During that time, after having drinks together, the client and the female employee had sexual relations.

The client believed it was a sexual relationship based on the mutual attraction of an adult man and woman, but the female employee accused the client of rape.

The client therefore came to Daeryun's rape attorney to establish his innocence.

■ Level of Punishment for Rape Under the Criminal Act

▶ Rape and Attempted Rape ("Criminal Act" Article 297 and Article 300)

Imprisonment for a definite term of at least 3 years, and punishment of attempts

▶ Imitative Rape and Attempted Imitative Rape ("Criminal Act" Article 297-2 and Article 300)

Imprisonment for a definite term of at least 2 years, and punishment of attempts

▶ Indecent Act by Compulsion and the Attempt ("Criminal Act" Article 298 and Article 300)

Imprisonment of up to 10 years or a fine of up to 15 million won, and punishment of attempts

▶ Quasi-rape, Quasi-indecent Act by Compulsion, and the Attempt ("Criminal Act" Article 299 and Article 300)

"Criminal Act" Article 297, Article 297-2 and Article 298 shall apply to the punishment, and attempts shall also be punished

The rape attorney proved, through a digital forensics investigation, that the client had sexual relations with the female employee by consent.

By analyzing the content of the text messages, he submitted, as a basis supporting innocence, conversations in which the two used affectionate nicknames for each other after the sexual relations with the female employee.

He analyzed and proved the content of the text conversations on the date and time stated in the indictment, when the female employee claimed she had been raped, and argued that the crime of rape was not established against the client.

The rape attorney argued that the female employee's claim that the client had raped her lacked consistency.

The female employee made the strained claim that, although she liked the client and had met him several times, she had never consented to sexual relations and had therefore been raped.

Daeryun's rape attorney argued that, in light of the evidence revealed by the results of the digital forensics investigation and other materials, the client and the female employee had a relationship no different from that of any other couple.

The rape attorney found and analyzed data related to the female employee through a digital forensics investigation.

He submitted as evidence the names saved in each other's cell phones, the content of thousands of messages, and call records between the female employee and the client.

Through the evidence, the rape attorney proved the relationship between the female employee and the client and argued that the crime of rape was not established.

The client in this case, who came to the rape attorney, was in a situation in which he had been unfairly accused of rape after having sexual relations with a female employee at the company with whom he shared a mutual attraction.

He came to the rape attorney to obtain assistance for a litigation defense, and the attorney did his utmost to establish the client's innocence through a digital forensics investigation.

As a result, the court accepted the arguments of Daeryun's rape attorney and found the client not guilty.

If you have a concern in a situation similar to the case above, you may come to Daeryun Law Firm's rape attorney at any time.