Deals & Cases

Violation of the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud
Violation of the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance FraudNon-referral (police)

Jeju Attorney Consultation | Assisting a Client Charged With Insurance Fraud, Leading to a No-Referral Decision

The client who requested a consultation with our Jeju attorney had been reported by an insurance company on a charge of insurance fraud.

Through a thorough consultation with our Jeju attorney, the client received a finding of no suspicion of crime.

1. The Client Who Requested a Consultation With Our Jeju Attorney

Jeju Attorney Consultation
See more of Daeryun's successful attorney consultation cases (click)

The client who sought help through a consultation with our Jeju attorney had been reported by an insurance company on a charge of insurance fraud arising from frequent traffic accidents.

As a victim of the traffic accidents, the client decided to seek a consultation in order to respond to the insurance company's unfair report, and so he came to Daeryun's 🔗Jeju office.

Our Jeju Attorney Explains the Level of Punishment for Insurance Fraud

Our Jeju attorney will explain the definition of and punishment for insurance fraud.

Insurance fraud : refers to conduct intended to wrongfully obtain insurance proceeds. It is carried out by methods such as stating false facts or claiming an accident that did not actually occur.

■Major Types of Insurance Fraud

-False claim: claiming insurance proceeds for a nonexistent accident or loss

-Excessive claim: claiming an amount greater than the loss that actually occurred

-Inducement of unlawful accidents: intentionally causing an accident to receive insurance proceeds

-Intentional injury: claiming insurance proceeds after sustaining an injury in an abnormal manner

-Multiple insurance fraud: claiming insurance proceeds from several insurers for the same accident

■Punishment for Insurance Fraud

Criminal Act Article 347 (Fraud)

① A person who deceives another and thereby takes property or obtains a pecuniary advantage shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 10 years or by a fine not exceeding 20 million won.

② The preceding paragraph shall also apply where a person, by the method described in the preceding paragraph, causes a third party to take property or to obtain a pecuniary advantage.

Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud Article 8 (Insurance Fraud)

① A person who falls under any of the following shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 10 years or by a fine not exceeding 50 million won.

1. A person who, through an act of insurance fraud, takes insurance proceeds or causes a third party to take insurance proceeds

2. A person who, in violation of Article 5-2, arranges, induces, solicits, or advertises an act of insurance fraud

② In the case of paragraph (1), subparagraph 1, imprisonment and a fine may be imposed concurrently.

2. A Defense Strategy Presented Through the Jeju Attorney Consultation

Through a thorough consultation, our Jeju attorney collected and presented evidence for the client's defense.

Jeju Attorney Consultation: Dashcam Footage and a Recorded Call Submitted as Evidence

The insurance company reported the client for insurance fraud on the ground that the client had recently suffered a series of similar traffic accidents and had received insurance proceeds for them.

Through the Jeju attorney consultation, the client submitted the dashcam footage and recorded call from the day of the incident as evidence.

The dashcam footage showed the client spotting the car ahead changing lanes without signaling and sounding the horn several times.

In addition, the client was on the phone with an acquaintance at the time of the accident, and through matters such as the client's flustered manner at the time of the accident captured in that recorded call, the client wholly denied the alleged fact that he had intentionally caused an accident to commit insurance fraud.

Jeju Attorney Consultation: Arguing the Absence of Evidence of Taking Insurance Proceeds

Our Jeju attorney pointed out that the insurance company had simply filed the report on the sole ground of ‘a series of recent traffic accidents of a similar type.’

There was no evidence whatsoever that the client had intentionally caused an accident in order to take insurance proceeds.

Daeryun's Jeju attorney emphasized that the client was, unfortunately, a victim who had recently suffered a series of traffic accidents.

3. Result of the Jeju Attorney Consultation: a No-Referral Decision for Insufficient Evidence

As a result of the assistance of Daeryun's Jeju attorney, the client was able to receive a no-referral decision on the charge of violating the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud, on the ground of insufficient evidence.

If You Need an Attorney Consultation Regarding Insurance Fraud

In the case of insurance fraud, the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud applies separately from the crime of fraud under the Criminal Act, and so a heavier punishment may be imposed.

As with the client in the case above, if you are in an unjust situation, you should present legal evidence through a consultation with an experienced attorney in order to establish your innocence.

Daeryun Law Firm offers consultations throughout the year, and it operates offices in many locations so that it can provide assistance close to where clients are.

If you need an attorney consultation in a situation such as the above, please visit the office of our Jeju attorney at Daeryun Law Firm.

제주변호사상담 | 보험사기 위반 혐의 의뢰인 도와 불송치

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Violation of the Special Act on Prevention of Insurance Fraud: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney ChanWoo JEONG

ChanWoo JEONG

T. 070-5221-2387

civil lawyer

Attorney EunYoung Kim

EunYoung Kim

T. 070-5117-2950

Prosecutor experience at Seoul Southern District Prosecutors’ Office and Uijeongbu District Prosecutors’ Office

Attorney HyoJoon KIM

HyoJoon KIM

T. 070-7510-1044

civil lawyer

Attorney Park Han Jin

Park Han Jin

T. 070-5221-2805

civil lawyer

Attorney HaNeul LEE

HaNeul LEE

T. 070-7510-1118

civil lawyer

Attorney InJun LEE

InJun LEE

T. 070-5214-2362

civil lawyer

Key Case Studies

View more

Related Practice Areas

View more
View our Case Handling System

Consult in other languages

Popular Columns

View more

Previous

Seoul Sex Crimes Attorney Case Study | A Prostitution Case Concluded With a Suspended Sentence Through the Assistance of Our Seoul Sex Crimes Attorney

Next

Assistance From a Changwon Criminal Attorney | A Childcare Teacher Accused of Child Abuse, Defended With a Suspended Sentence

View list
Quick Menu

Chat