Labor Attorney Assistance | A Client in a Confirmation of Nullity of Dismissal Case Wins with the Assistance of a Labor Attorney

The client in this case had been performing duties at the workplace for approximately three years.

One day, the client suddenly received notice of dismissal from the workplace on the grounds of wrongful receipt of a bonus, acts exceeding authority, and interference with duties.

Unjustly implicated in the allegations described above, the client requested an audit from the relevant authority in order to prove innocence.

As a result of the audit, it was found that the grounds for dismissal asserted by the defendant did not exist, and the client also received an acquittal on the charges of embezzlement and others.

The client felt deeply aggrieved at having been dismissed despite having learned and performed the defendant's duties independently and having never committed any unlawful act.

With the assistance of a specialized attorney, the client sought a labor attorney in order to establish that the defendant's act constituted 🔗unfair dismissaland to file a suit for confirmation of nullity of dismissal.

It was established in the audit and the trial that the facts asserted by the defendant as grounds for the client's dismissal involved no wrongdoing.

The attorney emphasized that the client had learned and performed the defendant's duties independently and in good faith, that there could have been trial and error in that process, but that the client had never committed any unlawful act.

The acts exceeding authority and interference with duties on the part of the client, as asserted by the defendant, arose from conflicts in the course of work.

At the time, many other employees also held considerable dissatisfaction with the defendant's unilateral decision-making.

The attorney emphasized that the client had merely performed duties amid the situation of conflict with the defendant at the time, and had not exercised any act exceeding authority or interfered with duties.

When a conflict with the client arose, the defendant dismissed the client without any legitimate grounds for dismissal and without following the proper procedure.

The attorney emphasized that, even though it had been established through the audit and the trial that there was no reason for the client's dismissal, the defendant was asserting the client's wrongdoing and thereby rationalizing the unfair dismissal.

Unlike other types of cases, labor cases have the characteristic of being somewhat distinctive and complex.

Daeryun LLC, on the basis of diverse experience in handling matters and its expertise, devises strategies suited to its clients and responds to cases accordingly.

If you find yourself in a situation similar to this case and require the assistance of a specialized attorney, please feel free to contact Daeryun LLC at any time.