Deals & Cases

Defense Against a Design Right Infringement Lawsuit
Defense Against a Design Right Infringement LawsuitWinning the case (favorable judgment)

Daeryun's Tongyeong Office Assistance | A Tongyeong Attorney Successfully Defends Against 90% of the Damages

Daeryun's Tongyeong office assisted a corporate client sued in a civil action for damages over design right infringement, and by defending against 90% of the amount claimed, obtained a favorable judgment.

1. The Client Who Came to Daeryun's Tongyeong Office

The client who came to Daeryun's Tongyeong office was a jewelry designer of necklaces, earrings, and the like, and had been sued by another jewelry designer who alleged that his design right had been infringed.

The Circumstances Examined by the Tongyeong Attorney

통영법률사무소-디자인권침해

Daeryun's Tongyeong office listened to the client's detailed account.

The client was selling rings, necklaces, earrings, and other items that she had designed herself at a jewelry shop.

She had also completed design right registration for those designs.

In the meantime, another designer claimed design right infringement, asserting that the ring she had designed and the ring the client was selling were substantially similar, and filed a lawsuit seeking damages for violation of the Copyright Act and the Design Protection Act.

In response, the client came to a specialist attorney at 🔗Daeryun's Tongyeong office to request a defense against the damages.

Design Right Infringement Explained by the Tongyeong Attorney

A design right is an important right that protects the external appearance or form of a product, and is a core element of a company's competitiveness.

If design rights are not protected, other companies may copy them without authorization and cause confusion in the market, which is why design rights are protected by law.

▣ Article 114 of the Design Protection Act (Acts Deemed Infringement)

The act of producing, transferring, leasing, exporting, or importing, as a business, any article used exclusively for producing articles relating to a registered design or a design similar thereto, or of offering, as a business, to transfer or lease such article, shall be deemed to infringe the design right or exclusive license.

The claims and punishment for design right infringement are as follows.

1. Application for a Provisional Injunction

A design right holder or an exclusive licensee may demand that the infringer suspend or cease the use of the design or other infringing acts.

2. Claim for Damages

Because design right infringement constitutes a tort, the design right holder and the exclusive licensee may claim damages on the basis of the infringer's tort.

3. Claim for Compensation of Unjust Enrichment

Where a design right holder or an exclusive licensee suffers loss due to an act constituting design right infringement, the profit causally connected to that loss is deemed "unjust enrichment," and the infringer is obligated to return it to the design right holder or exclusive licensee as unjust enrichment.

4. Criminal Punishment

Where a design right or an exclusive right of use is intentionally infringed, criminal punishment may be imposed depending on the circumstances of each case.

In addition, where the infringer is a corporation, the corporation shall be subject to a fine in addition to the punishment of the actor.

2. The Assistance of Daeryun's Tongyeong Office

After a thorough consultation with the client, Daeryun's Tongyeong office had a specialist attorney with extensive experience handling intellectual property disputes collaborate with an attorney who is a former patent attorney specializing in the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act, and argued as follows to defend the client's damages to the greatest extent possible.

Tongyeong Attorney, the Profit Obtained by the Client Was Very Small

The client had been selling the ring of that design for only a short time, and the jewelry shop where sales were currently taking place had likewise opened only recently, so the profit from ring sales was almost nonexistent.

Accordingly, under Article 115 (2) of the Design Protection Act*, it was argued that, because there was no evidence to recognize that the substantial profit claimed by the plaintiff had been obtained, the amount of damages could not be calculated.


* Article 115 (2) of the Design Protection Act

② Where a person who has infringed the right claims damages and has transferred the article by which the infringing act was committed, the sum of the amounts under the following subparagraphs may be deemed the amount of loss sustained by the design right holder or exclusive licensee.

1. The amount obtained by multiplying the quantity, among the transferred quantity of the article, not exceeding the quantity calculated by subtracting the quantity of articles actually sold from the quantity of articles the design right holder or exclusive licensee could have produced, by the per-unit profit of the articles the design right holder or exclusive licensee could have sold had there been no infringing act

2. Where there is a quantity, among the transferred quantity of the article, exceeding the quantity calculated by subtracting the quantity of articles actually sold from the quantity of articles the design right holder or exclusive licensee could have produced, or a quantity that could not have been sold for reasons other than the infringing act, the amount that could reasonably be received for the working of the registered design with respect to such quantities

3. The Result of Daeryun's Tongyeong Office Assistance, Successfully Defending Against 90% of the Damages

As a result of Daeryun's Tongyeong office actively assisting with the client's damages lawsuit, it succeeded in reducing the damages amount claimed by the plaintiff by 90%.

The client, who had feared that she would have to pay a large amount of damages while short of funds so soon after starting her business, repeatedly expressed her gratitude to Daeryun.

If You Have Been Sued for Intellectual Property Infringement

As in the above case, if you have been sued for infringement of a design right or any other intellectual property right, you will need specialized knowledge of the relevant law and legal procedures.

In order to defend and respond appropriately, it is advisable to entrust your case to a specialist attorney and proceed with a consultation.

Daeryun Law Firm (LLC) operates an 🔗Intellectual Property Group and provides assistance to protect clients' rights and interests in all disputes relating to property rights arising from intellectual activity, so if you need help, please request a legal consultation at any time.

통영법률사무소 조력 | 디자인권 침해로 손해배상 청구당한 의뢰인, 손해배상액 90% 방어에 성공

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Defense Against a Design Right Infringement Lawsuit: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Previous

Chuncheon Office Assistance Case | Daeryun Assists a Corporate Client and Achieves a ‘Declaration of Bankruptcy’

Next

Yongsan Attorney | A Yongsan Attorney Obtains a Suspension of Indictment for a Client Referred to Prosecution for Failing to Record Narcotics Use

View list
Quick Menu

Chat