Deals & Cases
Legal advice on the crime of destruction of evidence | Legal advice on whether the crime of destruction of evidence is established
The crime of destruction of evidence is a crime that is established by the act of destroying evidence relating to a case. Although its elements appear simple, there was a client who came to seek legal advice on whether it was established.
1. Legal advice on the establishment of the crime of destruction of evidence
This is the story of a client who, after searching the internet and various legal resources regarding the establishment of the crime of destruction of evidence and its elements, ultimately came to Daeryun Law Firm out of frustration.
The situation of the client who sought legal advice on destruction of evidence
🔗the crime of destruction of evidence The client visited Daeryun Law Firm to obtain advice on the precise question of whether this crime was established and on their own situation.
The client received word that their mother had died of asphyxiation while eating in a single room at a nursing facility.
The client held the funeral right away and did not separately report the matter by calling 112. They thought it was a sudden and tragic event caused by old age.
However, they learned that the care worker had been away for a long time, and realized that their mother had died of asphyxiation while left alone.
The client requested the CCTV footage, but the nursing facility did not provide the material, so they ultimately filed an application for preservation of evidence with the court and obtained a written decision.
However, in response to the court's request to submit opinions, the nursing facility stated that no footage existed.
Believing that the nursing facility had concealed the footage, the client sought legal advice on whether the crime of destruction of evidence was established and whether representation in filing a complaint was possible.
Whether the crime of destruction of evidence is established and its elements
The crime of destruction of evidence is provided for in the Criminal Act.
A person who, ① in relation to a criminal or disciplinary case of another, ② destroys, ③ conceals, forges, or alters evidence, or who uses forged or altered evidence, shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 5 years or a fine not exceeding 7 million won.
In other words, there must be an act of destroying or concealing evidence in another person's criminal case. Reinterpreting the statute, if one destroys evidence in one's own criminal case, there is no room for the crime of destruction of evidence to be established.
2. Provision of advice on the establishment of the crime of destruction of evidence
We reviewed whether there was room to contest the establishment of the crime of destruction of evidence and provided legal advice on whether there would be any practical benefit in filing a criminal complaint against the nursing facility for the crime of destruction of evidence.
Daeryun Law Firm reviewed the situation the client was in and the nursing facility's response, and provided the following legal advice.
Establishment of destruction of evidence, first: another person's criminal case
The first element of destruction of evidence is that it must concern another person's criminal case.
In the client's situation, the care worker had been the subject of a criminal complaint filed by the client for occupational negligence causing death.
This is a criminal case concerning the care worker, and because the person against whom the destruction-of-evidence complaint is directed is the nursing facility, the requirement of ‘another person's criminal case’ is satisfied.
Establishment of destruction of evidence, second: evidence
The second element of destruction of evidence is evidence.
All materials recognized as relevant to an investigative agency's or court's determination of whether the State's right to punish exists in another person's criminal case are regarded as evidence for purposes of destruction of evidence.
Therefore, any material related to the case can be regarded as evidence.
Establishment of destruction of evidence, third: destruction
The third element of destruction of evidence is the act of destruction.
The client filed an application for preservation of evidence with the court and obtained a written decision, believing they had secured the footage.
However, the nursing facility merely returned a written answer stating that no footage existed.
In response to the client's request, the facility did not answer that there was no material or that it was difficult to provide, but instead answered that it would provide it as soon as approval from headquarters was obtained.
From this, it can be inferred that an act of destruction occurred.
3. Result of the advice on the crime of destruction of evidence: engagement for assistance in filing a complaint
Having received clear legal advice on whether the crime of destruction of evidence was established, the client trusted in the ample expertise of Daeryun Law Firm's 🔗criminal law specialist attorneys and proceeded with an engagement for representation in filing a complaint for the crime of destruction of evidence.
Help with everything from the establishment of the crime of destruction of evidence to filing a complaint
The client who received legal advice on the establishment of the crime of destruction of evidence was satisfied.
At Daeryun Law Firm, criminal law specialist attorneys with abundant practical experience and expertise in criminal cases provide consultations and legal advice based on an accurate grasp of the facts.
In the course of representing the client in filing a complaint, if additional evidence is needed, we will lead a solid argument proving the charges through a collaborative request for independent evidence investigation by experts affiliated with the Daeryun Law Firm Criminal Group.
If you feel lost in your own case, from the stage of determining whether a crime is established to the work of gathering evidence, Daeryun Law Firm can resolve everything at once.

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.
Legal advice on the crime of destruction of evidence: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?
Consult aspecialized attorney
Related Information
Explore legal information related to this case.
Methods of Responding to Charges of Perjury Intended to Harm Another and Destruction of Evidence
Statute of Limitations for the Crime of Perjury: How to Assess the Period and Standards of Punishment
Statute of Limitations for Forgery of an Official Document, the Level of Punishment, and Standards for Responding
Daeryun's Key Strengths

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology
More than 240 key members
1,200+ cases handled per month
* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)
more strengths
Book a legal
consultation with an attorney
All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.
Phone consultation
1800-7905
Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year


Online consultation
We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation
KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys
Related Members
View moreRelated Practice Areas
View moreConsult in other languages
Popular Columns
View moreThe Meaning of Non-Referral, and Are There Differences Among the Types of Decisions?

Establishment of the Crime of Fraud: Determining the Requirements, Case Analysis, and Sentencing Guidelines

Criminal Record Inquiry and Expungement: How to Avoid Disadvantages

The Police Investigation Process, Methods of Response, and Tips for Giving Statements

Criminal Cases: Litigation Procedure, Types of Dispositions, and How to Respond

Previous
Changwon attorney | defends client charged with a violation of the Copyright Act and successfully avoids imprisonment
Next
Jinju drug attorney | Administering a narcotic several times, a Daeryun Jinju drug attorney avoided an immediate custodial sentence
View listDo you have more questions?














