Daegu school violence attorney | A case of proving that there was no school violence and having the plaintiff's claim dismissed

The client who requested the assistance of the Daegu school violence attorney was a high school student.

The client's classmate, Ms. A (hereinafter the plaintiff), claimed that she had been continuously harassed by the client.

Decisively, she reported school violence, claiming that at a bus stop the client had deliberately pushed past her, and that as a result she not only nearly fell but also dropped her phone and nearly suffered a serious accident.

The School Violence Countermeasures Deliberation Committee thus convened resolved that the client's alleged school violence did not constitute school violence.

In response, the plaintiff contested that disposition and filed a lawsuit to revoke the school violence disposition, claiming that the client had forcefully pushed her shoulder from behind.

Accordingly, the client came to Daeryun seeking to have the plaintiff's claim dismissed and requested the assistance of an attorney specializing in school violence.

After a student who has suffered school violence makes a report, if any one of the conditions for convening a meeting is met, the 🔗School Violence Countermeasures Deliberation Committee (hereinafter the school violence committee) is convened.

The school violence committee's deliberation is conducted on a points-assigned basis, assigning points by considering basic and additional assessment factors, and imposing a measure on the offender according to the total score.

As a result of the deliberation, the following school violence punishment measures may be imposed on the offending student.

The plaintiff submitted CCTV footage as evidence and claimed that the client had forcefully struck her with his shoulder.

However, at the time of the incident the area was crowded with students waiting for the bus, and numerous students were surging forward all at once to board the bus.

It was argued that the client, too, while running to board the bus, happened to brush against the plaintiff's shoulder by chance, and that he had not intentionally sought to collide with the plaintiff.

According to the statements of the students who were present with the client and the plaintiff at the time of the incident, no student witnessed the two colliding or coming into contact at the bus stop. In particular, the very students whom the plaintiff directly named gave the same statements.

If, as the plaintiff claimed, the client had struck the plaintiff so forcefully as to knock her down, someone nearby would have witnessed and remembered it. However, the attorney strongly emphasized that no student had witnessed any such thing.

The Daeryun Law Firm 🔗School Violence Response Group has attorneys specializing in school violence, equipped with expert knowledge, exclusively handling the review and management of matters referred to the School Violence Countermeasures Deliberation Committee.

If you are facing a deliberation over school violence, please visit the Daeryun Law Firm 🔗Daegu office and request our help.