Mokpo Divorce Consultation | Property Division Reduced by Judgment After Consultation With a Mokpo Divorce Attorney

The client who received the Mokpo divorce consultation had been in a marriage with the spouse for 30 years.

In the meantime, the spouse left home on the pretext of caring for a granddaughter and then suddenly sent a divorce complaint. Its main content was a claim for consolation money and a claim for division of marital property.

The spouse argued that the grounds for divorce were that the client had committed assault, used abusive language and verbal abuse, and shown disregard and insult toward the spouse,

and that the client had failed to provide living expenses without justifiable reason, thereby shifting responsibility for the breakdown of the marriage onto the client.

The plaintiff claimed a property division ratio of 70% for the plaintiff and 30% for the client,

and because the plaintiff sought registration of transfer of ownership for several pieces of real estate owned by the client, the client received a Mokpo divorce consultation in order to rebut this and then visited the divorce group of Daeryun Law Firm to seek help.

• See Supreme Court, 1999 ruling, among others

• See Supreme Court, 2000 decision, among others

• See Supreme Court, 2013 ruling, among others

Daeryun Law Firm, experienced in Mokpo divorce consultations, set out to point out the fact that the plaintiff claimed the client was the spouse at fault for the divorce and sought consolation money, and that the plaintiff included the client's separate property within the scope of property division and thereby expanded that scope,

as well as the fact that the plaintiff excessively inflated the degree of contribution to the household and the conflicting claims regarding the point in time at which the marriage broke down.

Because there was a sharp conflict of interest with the client regarding the overall content of the plaintiff's complaint and written submissions, a careful review by the responsible team was necessary.

● The client did not wish to divorce the plaintiff.

● The client did not subject the plaintiff to grossly unfair treatment and had never committed assault.

● Most of the real estate that the plaintiff included as subject to property division was the defendant's separate property held before the marriage.

● The plaintiff was a person so indifferent to the household that neighborhood residents wrote statements of fact to attest to it.

● The plaintiff made no effort to engage in any economic activity and did not contribute to the household.

● The plaintiff had never contributed to the farming work that the client had been doing, and the claim of a 70% contribution cannot be accepted.

This is the story of a client who, after receiving a Mokpo divorce consultation at Daeryun Law Firm, was recognized with a property contribution increased more than twofold, from 30% to 60%.

With the help of the divorce group of Daeryun Law Firm, the client was able to safely protect the real estate gifted to the children from the opposing spouse and to have a considerably high property contribution recognized.

If, in a situation like the client's, you are in a legal dispute with an opposing spouse over a property division matter, you may visit the Mokpo office of Daeryun Law Firm through a Mokpo divorce consultation to receive advice and help.