Gunsan attorney recommendation | A client who came on a recommendation defended the original judgment even on appeal in a case involving 30 instances of illegal filming using a camera

🔗The crime of illegal filming using a camera means filming illegally against the will of the person being filmed.

If a person secretly films part of another person's body and possesses or distributes the footage, the person may be subject to criminal punishment.

Even a photograph taken in a public place in which the face is not exposed may be subject to punishment for the crime of illegal filming using a camera if part of the body was filmed.

For the crime of illegal filming using a camera to be established as a criminal act, the act must be ▲against the will of the person being filmed and ▲must arouse sexual desire or shame.

If the charge is established, the person may be subject to imprisonment with labor for up to seven years or to a fine of up to 50 million won.

In addition, if the person receives a guilty verdict carrying a fine or heavier, the person may also be subject to an order to register and disclose personal information as a sex offender.

The client who sought a Gunsan attorney has fully acknowledged his own wrongdoing and is deeply remorseful.

From the time of the police investigation, the client admitted all of the charges and cooperated actively with the investigation, and he did not change his position at the trial of first instance either.

Since being caught for the offense in this case, the client has been writing letters of reflection almost every day to reflect on his conduct.

He has maintained an attitude of such deep remorse that he continued to write letters of reflection even after the trial of first instance.

The Gunsan attorney argued that for such a client, a penalty heavier than that of the court below would be excessive.

The client who sought a Gunsan attorney had never been in a relationship with a woman even by now, when he is over thirty years old.

As he grew older, he gradually came to feel deep loneliness and a sense of loss, and before the offense he had symptoms of emotional instability, including depressed mood, a sense of dejection, and reduced attention.

When he visited a psychiatrist and was examined, it was found that he was suffering from conditions including an unspecified habit and impulse disorder, an adjustment disorder, and nonorganic insomnia.

The Gunsan attorney argued that the client's offense was an impulsive act committed as a result of the loneliness and mental illness described above.