Deals & Cases
Violation of the Military Service Act | Defending a Client Who Failed to Report for Enlistment Despite Receiving a Conscription Notice and Achieving a Reduced Sentence
This is the story of a client who came to Daeryun for a violation of the Military Service Act. Daeryun defended a client who had been sentenced to 10 months' imprisonment for a violation of the Military Service Act and succeeded in having the sentence reduced to 4 months' imprisonment.
1. The Facts of the Offense Committed by the Client in the Military Service Act Violation
This is the story of a client who was sentenced to imprisonment for a violation of the Military Service Act and requested Daeryun's assistance.
The previous year, the client had received a suspended sentence for a violation of the Military Service Act, and then again violated the Military Service Act by failing, without justifiable grounds, to comply with a notice of active-duty enlistment.
The client came to be punished for a violation of the Military Service Act because he did not report for enlistment within the deadline despite having received an enlistment notice.
The client requested help from an attorney, stating that there were circumstances that left him with no choice but to violate the Military Service Act.
2. Level of Punishment for Violation of the Military Service Act
In view of the importance of fulfilling the military service obligation imposed on citizens of the Republic of Korea, the Military Service Act provides for punishment by imprisonment only, without any fine.
The client explained that, because he had not reported for enlistment despite receiving an enlistment notice, he had been sentenced to 10 months' imprisonment under the following provision.
■Military Service Act Article 88 (Evasion of Enlistment, etc.)
① A person who has received a notice of active-duty enlistment or call-up (including an enlistment notice based on recruitment) and, without justifiable grounds, fails to report for enlistment or to comply with the call-up even after the following periods have elapsed from the date of enlistment or call-up shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 3 years. However, where a person who has received an inspection notice in preparation for a wartime labor call-up under Article 53 (2) fails, without justifiable grounds, to attend the inspection at the designated date and time, the person shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 6 months, a fine not exceeding 5 million won, or detention.
1. Active-duty enlistment: 3 days
2. Call-up of social service personnel or alternative service personnel: 3 days
3. Call-up for military education: 3 days
4. Call-up for mobilization of troops and wartime labor call-up: 2 days
🔗Violation of the Military Service Act The client requested help so that he could receive a reduced sentence.
3. Defense of the Client in the Military Service Act Violation
For the client in the Military Service Act violation, the attorney mounted the following defense.
The Circumstances of the Offense by the Client in the Military Service Act Violation
The client in the Military Service Act violation married at a young age and has a 2-year-old child.
The client evaded military service for the sake of a household that he supports solely on his own earnings.
The client evaded military service simply out of the thought that his young child could be placed in danger if he were to be enlisted.
The Client's Sincere Remorse in the Military Service Act Violation
The client in the Military Service Act violation spent time in sincere remorse over the fact that he had again evaded military service despite having a prior conviction for the same type of offense.
The client had planned to enlist after saving up enough money for his child and wife to live on while he served in the military, but
the client came to realize that his economic situation and his enlistment in the military were separate matters, and decided to enlist.
However, because the criminal trial in this case had not been finalized, he was unable to apply for enlistment, and he prepared a written pledge of enlistment as an expression of his remorse.
The client is well aware that he had previously received a suspended sentence for a violation of the Military Service Act, and that, having committed the offense in this case during the period of that suspended sentence, an actual custodial sentence is unavoidable.
The client sincerely wishes to enlist even now and faithfully complete his military service.
The attorney examined the client's circumstances and requested that leniency be granted by way of a reduced sentence.
4. Judgment for the Client in the Military Service Act Violation

Having heard the arguments of the 🔗attorney who defended the client in the Military Service Act violation, the court issued the following judgment.
The original judgment is reversed. The defendant is sentenced to 4 months' imprisonment.
With the attorney's assistance, the client was able to have the sentence reduced from 10 months' to 4 months' imprisonment.
The client, having received a suspended sentence for the same type of crime and then committed the offense again within that period, could have faced a heavier punishment, but this result was obtained because of the attorney's assistance.
The Military Service Act is a law that sets out citizens' military service obligations, and violations of it are punished severely.
If you are in a situation similar to that of the client in this case, please seek Daeryun's assistance right away.

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.
Violation of the Military Service Act: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?
Consult aspecialized attorney
Related Information
Explore legal information related to this case.
Punishment for Violation of the Military Service Act | Requirements for Establishing Offenses Such as Evasion and Bodily Self-Injury and an Active Response Strategy
Standards for Punishment of Military Service Evaders and How to Respond
The Standards for Punishment of Draft Evasion and a Legal Guide to Responding to Punishment for Violations of the Military Service Act
Daeryun's Key Strengths

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology
More than 240 key members
1,200+ cases handled per month
* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)
more strengths
Book a legal
consultation with an attorney
All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.
Phone consultation
1800-7905
Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year


Online consultation
We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation
KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys
Related Members
View moreKey Case Studies
View moreRelated Practice Areas
View moreConsult in other languages
Popular Columns
View morePunishment Standards and Response Methods for Violations of Sexual Discipline in the Military

How to Respond to Military Assault, the Reporting Procedure, and Punishment of the Offender

The Procedure in Military Criminal Cases, Response Strategies, and the Need to Retain an Attorney

Punishment Criteria and Directions for Response According to the Types of Draft Evasion under the Military Service Act

What Are the Method of Reporting Cruel Treatment in the Military and the Punishment Standards?

Previous
Bundang Criminal Attorney Assistance | Bundang Attorney, Defending the Original Judgment in a Military Assault Case on Appeal
Next
Gwangju Attorney Recommendation | In a Fraud Case Involving Hundreds of Millions of Won, the First-Instance Judgment Was Upheld Despite the Prosecutor's Appeal on the Fraud Charge
View listDo you have more questions?













