Ulsan Drunk Driving Attorney | Client With Three Drunk Driving Offenses, Prosecutor's Appeal Seeking Imprisonment Dismissed and a Suspended Sentence Obtained

This is the account of the client who came to an Ulsan drunk driving attorney.

The client of the Ulsan drunk driving attorney stated that he had previously received fines on two occasions for drunk driving.

In this case, the client drove a passenger car for about 200m while intoxicated, with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.095%.

This case arose because he again committed drunk driving within 10 years from the date on which a sentence of a fine or heavier for drunk driving became final.

The client of the Ulsan drunk driving attorney faced the risk of imprisonment as a result of this case.

Article 44 of the Road Traffic Act (Prohibition of Driving While Intoxicated) ① No person shall drive a motor vehicle, etc., a tram, or a bicycle while intoxicated.

The client of the Ulsan drunk driving attorney drove a passenger car while intoxicated. Under the Road Traffic Act, driving a motor vehicle, etc., while intoxicated is prohibited.

④ The standard for the intoxicated state in which driving is prohibited under paragraph (1) shall be a driver's blood alcohol concentration of 0.03 percent or higher.

The standard for the intoxicated state is a blood alcohol concentration of 0.03% or higher. Because the client's blood alcohol concentration at the time of the incident was 0.095%, he could face the following punishment.

2. A person whose blood alcohol concentration is 0.08 percent or higher but less than 0.2 percent shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than 1 year but not more than 2 years or by a fine of not less than 5 million won but not more than 10 million won

The Ulsan drunk driving attorney mounted the following defense for the client.

The first-instance court, having heard the Ulsan drunk driving attorney, imposed a suspended sentence on the client.

However, the first-instance prosecutor appealed against the client, claiming that the sentence was too lenient,

and the Ulsan drunk driving attorney mounted a defense for the client.

The court, having heard the Ulsan drunk driving attorney, issued a judgment dismissing the prosecutor's appeal.

The client faced the risk of severe punishment after being caught for drunk driving for the third time, but with the assistance of the Ulsan drunk driving attorney, he was able to avoid that punishment and obtain a suspended sentence.

If you are in a situation facing the risk of 🔗drunk driving punishment like the client in this case, please seek the assistance of a drunk driving attorney.