Deals & Cases

Violation of the Act on Punishment of Crime of Stalking
Violation of the Act on Punishment of Crime of StalkingNon-Prosecution

Ansan Criminal Attorney | A Client Accused of Stalking Who Received a Non-Prosecution Decision With the Assistance of an Ansan Attorney

The Ansan criminal attorney defended a client who came seeking a criminal attorney after being accused of stalking. With the help of the Ansan attorney, the client received a non-prosecution decision.

1. The Client Who Sought an Ansan Criminal Attorney

This is the account of the client who sought an Ansan criminal attorney.

The client explained that he had been accused of stalking and that, after a police investigation, the case had been referred to the prosecutors' office. The client requested assistance, saying that his conduct did not appear to amount to stalking.

The details of the client's case as grasped by the Ansan criminal attorney were as follows.

Ansan Criminal Attorney Client

The complainant in the client's case accused him of stalking, alleging that the client sent text messages at all hours and repeatedly sent messages that caused anxiety.

However, the client explained that he had merely sent messages to protest after learning that the complainant had spoken disparagingly of him to his acquaintances.

The client pleaded that it was unfair, asking whether protesting after being insulted also amounted to stalking.

2. Stalking Conduct Explained by the Ansan Criminal Attorney

The Ansan criminal attorney's client was charged with stalking. Under the 🔗Act on Punishment of Crime of Stalking, stalking is defined as conduct that causes another person fear and anxiety against that person's will.

Causing objects, writings, or images to reach another person through an information and communications network so as to cause fear and anxiety, or approaching or watching another person without justifiable reason, is included among acts of stalking.

A single act of stalking does not result in punishment. If a stalking act is carried out continuously and repeatedly, it amounts to the crime of stalking and is punishable.

Article 2 (Definitions) of the Act on Punishment of Crime of Stalking. The terms used in this Act are defined as follows.

1. “Stalking act” means causing anxiety or fear in the other party by engaging, against the other party's will and without justifiable reason, in any of the acts in the following items against the other party, a person living with the other party, or a family member.

The Level of Punishment for the Crime of Stalking Explained by the Ansan Criminal Attorney

The Ansan criminal attorney's client was at risk of being punished for the crime of stalking because he had repeatedly engaged in the stalking act of sending messages.

Article 18 (Crime of Stalking) of the Act on Punishment of Crime of Stalking. ① A person who commits the crime of stalking shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 3 years or by a fine not exceeding KRW 30 million.

② A person who commits the crime of stalking while carrying or using a deadly weapon or other dangerous object shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than 5 years or by a fine not exceeding KRW 50 million.

3. The Ansan Criminal Attorney Takes On the Client's Indictment Defense

The Ansan criminal attorney set out to defend against indictment in order to conclude the client's case at the prosecution stage.

Ansan Criminal Attorney, “The Client Had No Intent to Stalk”

The Ansan criminal attorney emphasized that the client had no intent to stalk the complainant.

The client and the complainant had maintained a good relationship, but one day the client learned that the complainant had made disparaging remarks about the client to acquaintances.

The client sent a message to object to this, and because the complainant did not respond, the client simply continued to send messages requesting an apology.

The Ansan attorney argued that the client's conduct could not be regarded as stalking and that there had been no intent to stalk at all.

Ansan Criminal Attorney, “The Complainant Felt No Fear or Anxiety”

The Ansan criminal attorney emphasized that the complainant who filed the complaint against the client had felt no fear or anxiety.

For a charge of stalking to apply, the conduct must cause fear or anxiety in the other party,

but far from feeling any fear or anxiety from the client's conduct, the complainant in this case even shared the messages with acquaintances and mocked them.

The Ansan attorney argued that, because the complainant felt no fear or anxiety, the offense of stalking was not constituted.

4. Ansan Criminal Attorney Successfully Defends Against Indictment

Ansan Criminal Attorney
Clicking the image above takes you to the Daeryun Law Firm consultation booking page.

After hearing the Ansan criminal attorney's submissions, the prosecution issued a non-prosecution decision for the client.

This result was achieved because it was established that the offense of stalking did not apply to the client.

If, like the client in this case, you are unfairly suspected of a charge, you should respond immediately and establish that there is no basis for the charge.

As this can be difficult to do on your own, please seek the assistance of an 🔗Ansan attorney at any time.

안산검사출신변호사 | 스토킹으로 고소 당한 의뢰인, 전문변호사 조력으로 불기소 결정

This content is based on actual cases handled by Daeryun Law LLC and has been partially adapted. All copyrights belong to Daeryun Law LLC.
Unauthorized reproduction, copying or distribution may result in legal action under applicable laws.

Violation of the Act on Punishment of Crime of Stalking: Want a faster, more detailed consultation?

Consult a
specialized attorney

Related Information

Explore legal information related to this case.

Explore more legal information

Daeryun's Key Strengths

Daeryun's key strengths background
Litigation strategy using
Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

Litigation strategy using Daeryun's own AI & IT technology

More than 240
key members

More than 240 key members

*experience_cnt*+ cases handled
per month

1,200+ cases handled per month

* 2025년 월평균 기준
Complies with Korean Bar Association Advertising Regulations Article 4 (1)

Explore
more strengths
Explore more strengths arrow

Book a legal
consultation with an attorney

All consultations are reviewed by a specialized attorney first,
so they are conducted by appointment only.

Phone consultation

1800-7905

Available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year

Phone consultation
Online consultation

Online consultation

We provide tailored
legal services for our clients.

Chat consultation

Chat consultation

KakaoTalk channel
Daeryun Law LLC Attorneys

Request a consultation

Related Members

View more
Attorney DongIl PARK

DongIl PARK

T. 070-5221-3616

criminal lawyer

Attorney GeunSu KIM

GeunSu KIM

T. 070-5221-2805

Experience as chief prosecutor of Seoul Eastern Branch and chief prosecutor of Busan District Prosecutors' Office

Attorney SeungChan LEE

SeungChan LEE

T. 070-7510-1755

criminal lawyer

Key Case Studies

View more

Related Practice Areas

View more
View our Case Handling System

Consult in other languages

Popular Columns

View more

Previous

Case of an Action for Denial of Paternity | Defending Against an Action for Denial of Paternity Brought by the Father

Next

Anyang Attorney Referral | An Anyang Loan Attorney Who Claimed the Full KRW 400 Million Loan and the Litigation Costs

View list
Quick Menu

Chat