Gunsan Fraud Attorney Assistance | Gunsan Fraud Attorney, Non-Referral Defense on a Fraud Charge

The account of the client, who urgently sought out the Gunsan fraud attorney and requested a consultation, is as follows.

The client had been accused of 🔗the crime of fraud through a criminal complaint even though he had not engaged in any deception in the course of a land transaction.

The claim was that the client had deceived the complainant and sold him the forest land in this case despite the land being undevelopable.

The client was placed in a bewildering situation, since at the time of the sale he had clearly stated in the contract that the object of the sale was located in a development-restricted zone.

The complainant claimed that the client had, in the manner described above, deceived him and obtained approximately seventy million won under the pretext of the purchase price.

The client, seeking to clear himself of the fraud charge by proceeding with the case together with the attorney, held a detailed consultation with the Gunsan fraud attorney.

At the time of concluding the sale contract with the complainant, the client clearly disclosed that the object of the sale was in a development-restricted zone.

Through an on-site visit, the client even directly showed the complainant the geographical location, physical condition, and surrounding development status of the forest land.

In light of these facts, the attorney emphasized that there had been no deception of the complainant by the client at the time of the contract.

In the course of concluding the contract and the on-site visit with the complainant, the client granted the complainant the decision to purchase, telling him that the land was currently in a development-restricted zone and so its market price was low, but that he could realize capital gains through future development and should consider it carefully before deciding to buy.

The attorney emphasized that, since it was ultimately the complainant who decided to make the purchase, there had been no problem whatsoever in the course of concluding the contract.

In the course of the sale contract in this case, everything the client disclosed or explained to the complainant was consistent with the truth.

The remainder of the complainant's claims arose from his misunderstanding or were distorted.

The attorney therefore emphasized that this case was a complaint about a transaction in which the ‘deception’ necessary for the crime of fraud to be established was not recognized.

The case above was an instance in which a client charged with the crime of fraud obtained a non-referral decision through the assistance of the Gunsan fraud attorney.

Because the crux of the crime of fraud lies in proving intent and improper purpose, it is advantageous to receive an attorney's assistance early in the case.

🔗A criminal attorney draws on extensive case-handling experience and know-how to form a task force of three to twenty members and establish a tailored strategy.

If you have become involved in a fraud case like the one above and are looking for a solution, it is recommended to visit the Gunsan fraud attorney for a consultation at any time.