Yongsan Legal Consultation Assistance | Yongsan Attorney Reaches a Settlement in a Supply Contract Dispute Through Legal Consultation

Through the Yongsan legal consultation, the attorney was able to review the facts of the case in detail.

The client, the representative of a company that supplies portable credit card payment terminals, had entered into a contract to supply the terminals on the premise of telecommunications activation.

The main content of the contract was 'to deliver the terminals after telecommunications activation,' and the client promised to supply them to the other party on that condition.

However, the other party demanded delivery of the terminals even though it had not received the documents necessary for activation from the final buyer.

The client therefore filed a suit for confirmation of non-existence of debt, but the other party filed a counterclaim seeking delivery, and the conflict escalated.

In the end, the client, finding it difficult to handle all the legal proceedings alone, came to the Yongsan attorney and requested legal consultation.

A suit for confirmation of non-existence of debt is a procedure for legally confirming that a particular debt does not in fact exist between the parties to a contract.

That is, it is a suit filed in order to prove that a debt does not legally exist when one has received a demand from the other party to perform the debt.

The main purpose of this suit is to determine whether the debt exists and thus prevent future legal disputes.

The most important point in a suit for confirmation of non-existence of debt is securing clear evidence that can prove what one is asserting.

One must be able to confirm the content of the contract through the contract document, emails, texts, or messages, and to prove the non-performance of the debt or that the debt does not exist.

The Yongsan attorney carefully reviewed the contract document and related materials the client had submitted, and secured grounds to prove that the 'telecommunications activation' condition was included as an important item in the contract.

The attorney also secured additional evidence to prove this, and argued that the defendant, who had not submitted the documents necessary for telecommunications activation, had failed to perform its obligation.

The client had taken out guarantee insurance on two occasions in connection with this case.

Aware of this, the other party claimed the insurance proceeds, asserting that the client had not performed its debt.

The Yongsan attorney therefore proved, through related materials, that the client's non-performance of the debt was caused by the other party's breach of contract, and argued that the guarantee insurance claim filed by the other party was improper.

In this case, the client filed a lawsuit for confirmation of non-existence of debt on the ground that the other party to the contract had failed to perform its obligations, and after being subjected to a delivery claim lawsuit by the other party, sought legal assistance from a 🔗Yongsan attorney.

At Daeryun Law Firm, considering the client's situation and the scale of the case, a team of 3 to 20 professionals is formed to establish a strategy for resolving the matter.

If you are looking for a place to receive a Yongsan legal consultation as described above, please feel free to use the 🔗legal consultation booking service at any time.